Lobectomy With Artery Reconstruction and Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Weighting Study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is based, when suitable, on surgical resection. Pneumonectomy has been considered the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced lung cancers but it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery, associated with parenchyma-sparing techniques, is meant to be an alternative to pneumonectomy. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study is based on a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the clinical and oncologic data of patients treated between 2004 and 2016 through pneumonectomy or lobectomy with reconstruction of the pulmonary artery. A propensity score weighting approach, based on the preoperative characteristics of two groups of 124 patients each was performed. The subsequent statistical analysis evaluated long-term and short-term clinical outcomes together with risk factors analysis. RESULTS: The comparison between pneumonectomy and pulmonary artery reconstructions showed a higher 30-day (P = .02) and 90-day (P = .03) mortality rate in the pneumonectomy group, together with a higher incidence of major complications (P = .004). Long-term results have shown comparable outcomes, both in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (52.2% for pneumonectomy vs 46% for pulmonary artery reconstructions, P = .57) and overall 5-year survival (41.9% vs 35.6%, respectively; P = .57). Risk factors analysis showed that cancer-specific survival was related to lymph node status (P < .01) and absence of adjuvant therapy (P = .04). Lymph node status also influenced the risk of recurrence (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Lobectomy with reconstruction of the pulmonary artery is a valuable and oncologically safe alternative to pneumonectomy, with lower short-term mortality and morbidity, without affecting long-term oncologic results.

Robotic-assisted thymectomy: current perspectives.

Thymectomy is the cornerstone in the treatment of thymic tumors and an accepted option for the management of myasthenia gravis. Different surgical approaches have been described, but the gold standard is represented by median sternotomy. In the last two decades, the development of minimally invasive surgery has led to an increased acceptance of thymectomy, especially for benign diseases. Robotic thymectomy seems a further step in the development and evolution of minimally invasive approaches. Since its introduction, different authors described their experience with robotic thymectomy, both for nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis and for thymic tumors. Available data show that robotic thymectomy may be considered a safe and feasible operation. In patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia, robotic thymectomy is effective and the long-term results are encouraging. The role of robotic thymectomy in patients affected by thymoma is still under evaluation, but the intermediate results seem promising both in terms of surgical and oncologic outcomes.

Prognostic factors and clinical outcome in patients with surgically resected peripheral N0 adenocarcinoma <3 cm.

BACKGROUND: Many reports emphasize the role of sub-lobar resections in the treatment of small peripheral lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate a range of prognostic factors, including the extension of resection, which may affect the prognosis in a homogeneous group of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 279 patients affected by N0 small peripheral adenocarcinoma (ADK) <3 cm that underwent surgery between 2000 and 2010. Eleven patients were excluded due to non-tumour-related death. RESULTS: There were 176 (66%) males and 92 (34%) females with a median age of 74 years (range 47-93). In the series, 229 (85%) patients received a lobar resection and only 39 (15%) a sub-lobar resection. One hundred ninety-five patients (72%) resulted stage IA while 73 (28%) stage IB. No differences in 5-year survival were observed according to: age (P=0.32), sex (P=0.42), T1a vs. T1b (P=0.31), stage IA vs. IB (P=0.51) and type of resection (P=0.29). Patients affected by ADK with a predominant lepidic growth showed a better 5-year survival (91.3% vs. 81.5%; P=0.044). The multivariate analysis confirmed the growth pattern as an independent risk factor (P=0.048). In patients with visceral pleura infiltration, the sub-lobar resection was associated with a significantly lower 5-year survival compared to lobectomy (63% vs. 90%; P=0.033). The visceral pleural infiltration was independent from ADK growth pattern, predominant lepidic vs. non-lepidic (P=0.51), but it was significantly more frequent in the ADK>2 cm (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Small peripheral (<3 cm) N0 lung ADK can be easily resected by wedge or anatomical segmentectomy. The lepidic growth pattern is the main prognostic factor independently from the extension of resection however, in case of visceral pleural involvement, lobectomy reduces significantly the risk of recurrence.