Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 17: E31, 2020 04 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298229

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Delta Regional Authority (DRA) consists of 252 counties and parishes in 8 states in the US Mississippi Delta region. DRA areas have high rates of disease, including cancers related to the human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccination coverage in the DRA region has not been documented. METHODS: We analyzed data for 63,299 adolescents aged 13 to 17 years in the National Immunization Survey-Teen, 2015-2017. We compared HPV vaccination initiation coverage estimates (≥1 dose) in the DRA region with coverage estimates in areas in the 8 Delta states outside the DRA region and non-Delta states. We examined correlates of HPV vaccination coverage initiation and reasons parents did not intend to vaccinate adolescents. RESULTS: Vaccination rates in the DRA region (n = 2,317; 54.3%) and in Delta areas outside the DRA region (n = 6,028; 56.2%) were similar, but these rates were significantly lower than rates in non-Delta states (n = 54,954; 61.4%). Inside the DRA region, reasons for parents' vaccine hesitancy or refusal were similar to those expressed by parents in the Delta areas outside the DRA region. Some parents believed that the vaccine was not necessary or had concerns about vaccine safety. CONCLUSION: HPV vaccination coverage in the DRA region is similar to coverage in other Delta counties and parishes, but it is significantly lower than in non-Delta states. Activities to address parental concerns and improve provider recommendations for the vaccine in the DRA region are needed to increase HPV vaccination rates.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Áreas de Pobreza , Sudeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
2.
N Engl J Med ; 358(15): 1580-9, 2008 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18403766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of a second dose of mumps vaccine among U.S. schoolchildren beginning in 1990 was followed by historically low reports of mumps cases. A 2010 elimination goal was established, but in 2006 the largest mumps outbreak in two decades occurred in the United States. METHODS: We examined national data on mumps cases reported during 2006, detailed case data from the most highly affected states, and vaccination-coverage data from three nationwide surveys. RESULTS: A total of 6584 cases of mumps were reported in 2006, with 76% occurring between March and May. There were 85 hospitalizations, but no deaths were reported; 85% of patients lived in eight contiguous midwestern states. The national incidence of mumps was 2.2 per 100,000, with the highest incidence among persons 18 to 24 years of age (an incidence 3.7 times that of all other age groups combined). In a subgroup analysis, 83% of these patients reported current college attendance. Among patients in eight highly affected states with known vaccination status, 63% overall and 84% between the ages of 18 and 24 years had received two doses of mumps vaccine. For the 12 years preceding the outbreak, national coverage of one-dose mumps vaccination among preschoolers was 89% or more nationwide and 86% or more in highly affected states. In 2006, the national two-dose coverage among adolescents was 87%, the highest in U.S. history. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high coverage rate with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine, a large mumps outbreak occurred, characterized by two-dose vaccine failure, particularly among midwestern college-age adults who probably received the second dose as schoolchildren. A more effective mumps vaccine or changes in vaccine policy may be needed to avert future outbreaks and achieve the elimination of mumps.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Caxumba , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacina contra Caxumba/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Caxumba/genética , Vírus da Caxumba/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Falha de Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Pediatrics ; 145(3)2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32086388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) provides vaccines for children who may not otherwise be vaccinated because of financial barriers. Pediatrician participation is crucial to the VFC's ongoing success. Our objectives were to assess, among a national sample of pediatricians, (1) VFC program participation, (2) perceived burden versus benefit of participation, and (3) knowledge and perception of a time-limited increased payment for VFC vaccine administration under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. METHODS: An electronic and mail survey was conducted from June 2017 to September 2017. RESULTS: Response rate was 79% (372 of 471); 86% of pediatricians reported currently participating in the VFC; among those, 85% reported never having considered stopping, 10% considered it but not seriously, and 5% seriously considered it. Among those who had considered no longer participating (n = 47), the most commonly reported reasons included difficulty meeting VFC record-keeping requirements (74%), concern about action by the VFC for noncompliance (61%), and unpredictable VFC vaccine supplies (59%). Participating pediatricians rated, on a scale from -5 (high burden) to +5 (high benefit), their overall perception of the VFC: 63% reported +4 or +5, 23% reported +1 to +3, 5% reported 0, and 9% reported -1 to -5. Of pediatricians, 39% reported awareness of temporary increased payment for VFC vaccine administration. Among those, 10% reported that their practice increased the proportion of Medicaid and/or VFC-eligible patients served on the basis of this change. CONCLUSIONS: For most pediatricians, perceived benefits of VFC participation far outweigh perceived burdens. To ensure the program's ongoing success, it will be important to monitor factors influencing provider participation.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Programas de Imunização , Pediatria , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 34(6): 463-470, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18471581

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Official recommendations for the routine vaccination of U.S. children, made by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), specify the vaccines for administration, the number of doses that should be given, the age ranges for administration, the minimum ages at which doses are considered valid, the minimum intervals between doses within a series, and several additional vaccine-specific adjustments and exceptions. Federally reported estimates of vaccination coverage measure only compliance with the required number of doses; other recommendations are not routinely evaluated. METHODS: Analysis of vaccination histories for 17,563 U.S. children aged 19-35 months from the 2005 National Immunization Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with, and incremental impact of, each vaccination recommendation. RESULTS: Estimated coverage was 72% for the standard vaccination series accounting for all recommendations, 9 percentage points lower than coverage based solely on counting doses. Overall, 19% of children were missing one or more doses, while 8% had received an invalid dose, and 9% were affected by other recommendations. The proportion of noncompliance due to missed doses versus other recommendations varied by state and by antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 28% of children were not in compliance with the official vaccination recommendations. Missed doses accounted for approximately two thirds of noncompliance, with the remainder due to mis-timed doses and other requirements. Measuring compliance with all ACIP recommendations provides a valuable tool to assess and improve the quality of healthcare delivery and ensure that children and communities are optimally protected from vaccine-preventable diseases.


Assuntos
Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estados Unidos
5.
Am J Prev Med ; 40(5): 548-55, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of increased parental vaccine safety concerns on physicians' vaccine communication attitudes and practices. PURPOSE: To assess among pediatricians and family medicine (FM) physicians: (1) prevalence of parental requests to deviate from recommended vaccine schedules; (2) responses to such requests; and (3) attitudes about the burden and success of vaccine communications with parents. METHODS: Survey of nationally representative samples of pediatricians and FM physicians (N=696) conducted during February to May 2009 with analysis in 2010. RESULTS: Response rates were 88% for pediatricians and 78% for FM physicians. Overall, 8% of physicians reported that ≥10% of parents refused a vaccine and 20% reported that ≥10% of parents requested to spread out vaccines in a typical month. More pediatricians than FM physicians reported always/often requiring parents to sign a form if they refused vaccination (53% vs 31%, p<0.0001); 64% of all physicians would agree to spread out vaccines in the primary series at least sometimes. When talking with parents with substantial concerns, 53% of physicians reported spending 10-19 minutes and 8% spending ≥20 minutes. Pediatricians were more likely than FM physicians to report their job less satisfying because of parental vaccine concerns (46% vs 21%, p<0.0001). Messages most commonly reported as "very effective" were personal statements such as what they would do for their own children. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of communicating with parents about vaccines is high, especially among pediatricians. Physicians report the greatest success convincing skeptical parents using messages that rely on their personal choices and experiences.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais/psicologia , Pediatria , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores de Tempo
6.
J Adolesc Health ; 42(2): 137-45, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18207091

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Health Plan Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) provides comparative information across health plans to measure the quality of care and preventive services for health plan beneficiaries. We examined recent trends in adolescent immunizations recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) measured through HEDIS and reported to the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). METHODS: The study was based on a longitudinal regression analysis of commercial managed care organizations' HEDIS measures from 1999-2002. HEDIS performance measures and plan characteristics include a sample of approximately 100-400 enrollees per plan each year. The outcome measures were the proportions of enrollees aged 13 years sampled in the plan who received measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR), hepatitis B vaccine, and varicella vaccine. RESULTS: The immunization rates for all three antigens increased significantly from 1999 to 2002 (MMR: 57-68%; hepatitis B: 28-51%; and varicella: 21-38%). Factors in the final multivariable models that were found to be significantly associated with increased proportions immunized with MMR vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, and varicella vaccine include year of report, presence of school entry laws, years in business up to 25 years, and operating in the northeastern U.S. region; the only factor associated with decreasing immunization rates for all antigens was the number of providers per 100 commercial enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous reports, adolescent immunization rates are improving yet remain suboptimal. Strategies to increase immunization rates, as well as to improve documentation of immunization status, among commercial health insurance plans need to be developed and implemented.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente/organização & administração , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação das Necessidades , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA