Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ear Hear ; 41(4): 693-696, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427744

RESUMO

As states begin issuing progressive deconfinement guidelines, hospitals and institutions are starting to reopen for elective procedures and consultations. Vestibular clinicians are opening their practices to evaluate, test, or treat patients with dizziness and balance problems. The following document, requested by the American Balance Society, collates the current information about the virus, including transmission from asymptomatic carriers, decontamination, and other safety protocols, and provides a return to work guidance for clinicians caring for this population of patients, promoting provider, patient, and staff safety.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Doenças Vestibulares/diagnóstico , Doenças Vestibulares/reabilitação , Testes de Função Vestibular/instrumentação , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Desinfecção/métodos , Teste do Impulso da Cabeça , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Retorno ao Trabalho , SARS-CoV-2 , Potenciais Evocados Miogênicos Vestibulares
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 43(8): e810-e813, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35900913

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report a novel occurrence of unaided hearing recovery after cochlear implantation in a patient with Menière's disease. PATIENTS: A 49-year-old woman with bilateral Menière's disease and vestibular migraine. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative unaided and aided pure tone thresholds and speech recognition measures. RESULTS: Six-month postoperative unaided hearing in the implanted ear was in the moderate sensorineural hearing loss range with a speech reception threshold of 45 dB and word recognition score of 95%, representing a significant improvement from preoperative hearing, which was in the profound sensorineural hearing loss range with an unaided speech awareness threshold of 75 dB and inability to perform speech recognition testing. Aided testing also demonstrated an expected postoperative improvement after 6 months with a CNC word and AzBio in quiet score of 96% and 93%, respectively, from 0% and 9% preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Unaided hearing improvement after cochlear implantation in a patient with Menière's disease is unexpected, but possible and might lend insight into the poorly understood underlying mechanisms of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with Menière's disease.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Doença de Meniere , Percepção da Fala , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Audição , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/cirurgia , Humanos , Doença de Meniere/complicações , Doença de Meniere/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(6): 828-835, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32271263

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the usefulness of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in the diagnosis of Menière's disease (MD) and vestibular migraine (VM). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Multidisciplinary neurotology clinic. PATIENTS: Definite MD and definite VM patients between January, 2015 and May, 2017, as well as healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Cervical and ocular VEMP (cVEMP and oVEMP) testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VEMP response, amplitude, and latency. RESULTS: Twenty five definite MD, 34 definite VM, and 13 control subjects were analyzed. MD affected ears had significantly lower cVEMP (p = 0.007) and oVEMP (p < 0.001) amplitudes than control ears. VM ears had significantly lower oVEMP (p = 0.001), but not cVEMP (p = 0.198) amplitudes than control ears. MD affected ears, but not VM ears, had significantly more absent cVEMP (25.9% versus 0%, p = 0.005) and oVEMP responses (40.7% versus 0%, p < 0.001) than control ears. oVEMP latency was significantly shorter for both MD affected (p < 0.001) and VM ears (p < 0.001) than control ears. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using a neurotology clinic MD prevalence of 7.9% in dizzy patients. A present cVEMP or oVEMP both have more than 93% chance of ruling MD out in the tested ear, while a cVEMP amplitude more than 54.9 µV or oVEMP amplitude more than 5.1 µV both have more than 94% of ruling out MD in the tested ear. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some overlap in VEMP results between MD and VM, when the diagnosis is uncertain between the two disorders due to symptomatic overlap and nonspecific audiometric data, VEMPs can be helpful in guiding treatment toward one disease entity or the other until more evidence points to a definitive diagnosis.


Assuntos
Doença de Meniere , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Potenciais Evocados Miogênicos Vestibulares , Humanos , Doença de Meniere/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vertigem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA