National Kidney Foundation Laboratory Engagement Working Group Recommendations for Implementing the CKD-EPI 2021 Race-Free Equations for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate: Practical Guidance for Clinical Laboratories.

Recognizing that race is a social and not a biological construct, healthcare professionals and the public have called for removal of race in clinical algorithms. In response, the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology created the Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Diseases to examine the issue and provide recommendations. The final report from the Task Force recommends calculating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) without a race coefficient using the recently published CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine (cr) and creatinine-cystatin C (cr-cys) equations. The Task Force recommends immediately replacing older eGFRcr equations (MDRD Study and CKD-EPI 2009) with the new CKD-EPI 2021 equation. In a 2019 survey by the College of American Pathologists, 23% of 6200 laboratories reporting eGFRcr used an incorrect equation that is not suitable for use with standardized creatinine measurements, 34% used the CKD-EPI 2009 equation and 43% used the MDRD Study 2006 equation re-expressed for standardized creatinine measurement. Rapid transition to using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation is an opportunity for laboratories to standardize to a single equation to eliminate differences in eGFRcr due to different equations used by different laboratories, and to report eGFR without use of race. We provide guidance to laboratories for implementing the CKD-EPI 2021 equations for both eGFRcr and eGFRcr-cys.

An Intact ACTH LC-MS/MS Assay as an Arbiter of Clinically Discordant Immunoassay Results.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is key in the differential diagnosis of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal disorders. Two-site sandwich immunoassays dominate clinical testing of ACTH in North America; however, discordant results between manufacturers have been repeatedly reported. To resolve the discrepancy, we developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the intended measurand, biologically active intact ACTH (iACTH). METHODS: The multiple reaction monitoring LC-MS/MS assay was designed to selectively measure full-length iACTH, as well as ACTH analogs and fragments (i.e., ACTH1-24 and ACTH18-39). Epitope assignment of the Roche Elecsys antibodies was performed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. A method comparison between Roche Elecsys and Siemens Immulite ACTH immunoassays was performed and clinically concordant/discordant results identified. In a subset of these samples, the iACTH concentration was determined using the LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: The lower limit of the measuring interval of the iACTH LC-MS/MS assay was 9 pg/mL (2 pmol/L). The assay was linear from 9 to 1938 pg/mL (2 to 427 pmol/L). Epitope mapping revealed that the Roche capture and detection antibodies bound residues 9-12 and 36-39 of ACTH, respectively. The iACTH LC-MS/MS analysis demonstrated that for discordant results between 2 immunoassays studied, only the Roche results were highly positively correlated with the iACTH concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Immunoprecipitation of biologically active ACTH molecules followed by LC-MS/MS analysis enabled selective detection of iACTH and relevant biologically active fragments in plasma. Applied to the investigation of clinically discrepant results, this method can act as an arbiter of the concentration of iACTH present.

LC-MS/MS Measurement of Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide.

INTRODUCTION: Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) is involved in activating pathways, allowing tumor cells to form bone metastases. Measurement of PTHrP is used for the diagnosis and clinical management of patients suspected of hypercalcemia of malignancy. We developed an LC-MS/MS method for measuring PTHrP, established sex-specific reference intervals, and assessed the method's performance. METHODS: PTHrP was enriched from plasma samples with rabbit polyclonal anti-PTHrP antibody conjugated to magnetic beads. Enriched PTHrP was digested with trypsin, and PTHrP-specific tryptic peptide was analyzed with 2-dimensional LC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring mode. RESULTS: The lower limit of quantification was 0.6 pmol/L, and the upper limit of linearity was 600 pmol/L. Total imprecision was <10%. Very poor agreement was observed with the RIA (n = 207; Deming regression RIA = 0.059 × LC-MS/MS - 1.8, r = 0.483; Sy|x = 3.9). Evaluation of the clinical performance of the assay using samples from patients with and without hypercalcemia (n = 199) resulted in an area under the ROC curve of 0.874. In sets of consecutively analyzed routine samples of patients assessed for hypercalcemia, the PTHrP positivity rate by RIA (n = 1376) was 1.9%, and 26.6% by LC-MS/MS (n = 1705). Concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification in 95.6% of the samples by RIA and 2.0% by LC-MS/MS. CONCLUSIONS: PTHrP is a normal constituent in circulating blood and its concentrations are substantially underestimated by commercial RIAs, causing false-negative results in samples from patients suspected of hypercalcemia. Our observations suggest a link between increased concentrations of PTHrP in postmenopausal women with low body mass index and increased incidence of osteoporosis.

Performance characteristics of the ARCHITECT Active-B12 (Holotranscobalamin) assay.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) is a necessary cofactor in methionine and succinyl-CoA metabolism. Studies estimate the deficiency prevalence as high as 30% in the elderly population. Ten to thirty percent of circulating cobalamin is bound to transcobalamin (holotranscobalamin, holoTC) which can readily enter cells and is therefore considered the bioactive form. The objective of our study was to evaluate the analytical performance of a high-throughput, automated holoTC assay (ARCHITECT i2000(SR) Active-B12 (Holotranscobalamin)) and compare it to other available methods. METHODS: Manufacturer-specified limits of blank (LoB), detection (LoD), and quantitation (LoQ), imprecision, interference, and linearity were evaluated for the ARCHITECT HoloTC assay. Residual de-identified serum samples were used to compare the ARCHITECT HoloTC assay with the automated AxSYM Active-B12 (Holotranscobalamin) assay (Abbott Diagnostics) and the manual Active-B12 (Holotranscobalamin) Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Axis-Shield Diagnostics, Dundee, Scotland, UK). RESULTS: Manufacturer's claims of LoB, LoD, LoQ, imprecision, interference, and linearity to the highest point tested (113.4 pmol/L) were verified for the ARCHITECT HoloTC assay. Method comparison of the ARCHITECT HoloTC to the AxSYM HoloTC produced the following Deming regression statistics: (ARCHITECT(HoloTc)) = 0.941 (AxSYM(HoloTC)) + 1.2 pmol/L, S(y/x) = 6.4, r = 0.947 (n = 98). Comparison to the Active-B12 EIA produced: (ARCHITECT(HoloTC)) = 1.105 (EIA(Active-B12)) - 6.8 pmol/L, S(y/x) = 11.0, r = 0.950 (n = 221). CONCLUSIONS: This assay performed acceptably for LoB, LoD, LoQ, imprecision, interference, linearity and method comparison to the predicate device (AxSYM). An additional comparison to a manual Active-B12 EIA method performed similarly, with minor exceptions. This study determined that the ARCHITECT HoloTC assay is suitable for routine clinical use, which provides a high-throughput alternative for automated testing of this emerging marker of cobalamin deficiency.

Clinical Impact of New Reference Intervals for the Roche Prolactin II Immunoassay.

Context: The Roche prolactin immunoassay is used throughout the world. It reports higher values than the Siemens immunoassay but the manufacturer-defined reference intervals are similar. Patient results are often above the Roche upper limit but within the Siemens interval, causing diagnostic confusion. Objective: Establish new reference intervals for the Roche and Siemens prolactin immunoassays. Methods: We established new reference intervals for the Roche and Siemens immunoassays using 374 specimens from healthy outpatients. We performed chart review for unnecessary testing and treatment for 298 patients in a 6-month period with at least 1 Roche prolactin value above the manufacturer-defined upper limit and below our new upper limit. Results: The new upper limit for the Roche assay was 37.8 ng/mL (females) and 22.8 ng/mL (males). The manufacturer-defined limits were 23.3 ng/mL and 15.2 ng/mL, respectively. New intervals for the Siemens assay matched the manufacturer. No cases of clinically significant pathophysiologic prolactin excess were identified in patients with values between the manufacturer-defined upper reference limit and our new Roche upper limit. Unnecessary further evaluation in these patients included 459 repeat prolactin measurements, 57 macroprolactin measurements, 39 magnetic resonance imaging studies, and 28 endocrine referrals. Eleven patients received dopamine agonists. The minimum cost of excess care using Medicare reimbursement rates was $34 134, with substantially higher amounts billed to patients and their insurance providers. Conclusion: Adoption of new upper reference limits for the Roche prolactin assay of 37.8 ng/mL (females) and 22.8 ng/mL (males) would not delay diagnosis or necessary intervention in patients with clinically significant pituitary tumors but would reduce unnecessary evaluation in patients without pathophysiologic prolactin excess.

Mistaken Identity: The Role of Autoantibodies in Endocrine Disease.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune endocrine diseases can be thought of as a case of mistaken identity. The immune system mistakenly attacks one's own cells, as if they were foreign, which typically results in endocrine gland hypofunction and inadequate hormone production. Type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune thyroid disorders (Hashimoto and Graves diseases) are the most common autoimmune endocrine disorders, while conditions such as Addison disease are encountered less frequently. Autoantibody production can precede clinical presentation, and their measurement may aid verification of an autoimmune process and guide appropriate treatment modalities. CONTENT: In this review, we discuss type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and Addison disease, emphasizing their associated autoantibodies and methods for clinical detection. We will also discuss efforts to standardize measurement of autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune endocrine disease progression may take months to years and detection of associated autoantibodies may precede clinical onset of disease. Although detection of autoantibodies is not necessary for diagnosis, they may be useful to verify an autoimmune process.

StrataGraft skin substitute is well-tolerated and is not acutely immunogenic in patients with traumatic wounds: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled dose escalation trial.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the immunogenicity and antigenicity of StrataGraft skin tissue in a randomized phase I/II clinical trial for the temporary management of full-thickness skin loss. BACKGROUND: StrataGraft skin tissue consists of a dermal equivalent containing human dermal fibroblasts and a fully stratified, biologically active epidermis derived from Near-diploid Immortalized Keratinocyte S (NIKS) cells, a pathogen-free, long-lived, consistent, human keratinocyte progenitor. METHODS: Traumatic skin wounds often require temporary allograft coverage to stabilize the wound bed until autografting is possible. StrataGraft and cadaveric allograft were placed side by side on 15 patients with full-thickness skin defects for 1 week before autografting. Allografts were removed from the wound bed and examined for allogeneic immune responses. Immunohistochemistry and indirect immunofluorescence were used to assess tissue structure and cellular composition of allografts. In vitro lymphocyte proliferation assays, chromium-release assays, and development of antibodies were used to examine allogeneic responses. RESULTS: One week after patient exposure to allografts, there were no differences in the numbers of T or B lymphocytes or Langerhans cells present in StrataGraft skin substitute compared to cadaver allograft, the standard of care. Importantly, exposure to StrataGraft skin substitute did not induce the proliferation of patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells to NIKS keratinocytes or enhance cell-mediated lysis of NIKS keratinocytes in vitro. Similarly, no evidence of antibody generation targeted to the NIKS keratinocytes was seen. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that StrataGraft tissue is well-tolerated and not acutely immunogenic in patients with traumatic skin wounds. Notably, exposure to StrataGraft did not increase patient sensitivity toward or elicit immune responses against the NIKS keratinocytes. We envision that this novel skin tissue technology will be widely used to facilitate the healing of traumatic cutaneous wounds.This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00618839).

Investigating interferences of a whole-blood point-of-care creatinine analyzer: comparison to plasma enzymatic and definitive creatinine methods in an acute-care setting.

BACKGROUND: Although measurement of whole-blood creatinine at the point of care offers rapid assessment of renal function, agreement of point-of-care (POC) results with central laboratory methods continues to be a concern. We assessed the influence of several potential interferents on POC whole-blood creatinine measurements. METHODS: We compared POC creatinine (Nova StatSensor) measurements with plasma enzymatic (Roche Modular) and isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) assays in 119 hospital inpatients. We assessed assay interference by hematocrit, pH, pO(2), total and direct bilirubin, creatine, prescribed drugs, diagnosis, red blood cell water fraction, and plasma water fraction. RESULTS: CVs for POC creatinine were 1.5- to 6-fold greater than those for plasma methods, in part due to meter-to-meter variation. Regressioncomparison of POC creatinine to IDMS results gave a standard error (S(y|x)) of 0.61 mg/dL (54 µmol/L), whereas regression of plasma enzymatic creatinine to IDMS was S(y|x) 0.16 mg/dL (14 µmol/L). By univariate analysis, bilirubin, creatine, drugs, pO(2), pH,plasma water fraction, and hematocrit were not found to contribute to method differences. However, multivariate analysis revealed that IDMS creatinine, red blood cell and plasma water fractions, and hematocrit explained 91.8% of variance in POC creatinine results. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that whole-blood POC creatinine measurements should be used with caution. Negative interferences observed with these measurements could erroneously suggest adequate renal function near the decision threshold, particularly if estimated glomerular filtration rate is determined. Disparity between whole-blood and plasma matrices partially explains the discordance between whole-blood and plasma creatinine methods.