Treat-to-target in real-life psoriatic arthritis patients: achieving minimal disease activity with bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and potential barriers.

OBJECTIVE: (1) to describe the frequency of minimal disease activity (MDA) in a real-life psoriatic arthritis (PsA) cohort, (2) to longitudinally explore predictors of MDA; (3) to examine frequency and predictors of low disease activity (LDA) in patients with axial involvement (axPsA). METHODS: consecutive PsA patients in stable biological/targeted-synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs/tDMARDs) who attended our center were enrolled. Disease activity indices, including MDA and ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score-LDA (ASDAS-LDA) for axPsA, were evaluated at baseline and every 6 months, up to 36 months or bDMARDs/tsDMARDs discontinuation. Patients' history, BMI, comorbidities - including osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia - were collected. Variables were compared between patients who achieved sustained MDA and those who did not. Multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were built to identify predictors of MDA and ASDAS-LDA over time. Data were expressed as beta coefficient (95%CI). RESULTS: 104 patients were enrolled, 54% males, mean age 55.7 years; 52% had axPsA. Across all evaluations, 52-61% reached MDA, and 17-24% achieved ASDAS-LDA. AxPsA, fibromyalgia, OA and BMI≥35 were less frequently observed in patients with sustained MDA. The GEE model confirmed the following factors were significantly and independently associated with MDA: age (Beta=-0.05), bDMARDs/tsDMARDs duration (Beta=+0.31), axPsA (Beta=-1.07), fibromyalgia (Beta=-3.35), OA (Beta=-1.87), BMI≥35 (Beta=-2.53). Age (Beta=-0.01), fibromyalgia (Beta=-2.03) and OA (Beta=-1.30) were also independently associated with ASDAS-LDA. CONCLUSIONS: MDA is an attainable target in real-life. AxPsA represents a difficult-to-treat subset. Sustained MDA depends on disease features (axPsA) as well as patients' characteristics (e.g. age, bDMARDs/tDMARDs duration, comorbidities).

The impact of diet on disease activity in spondyloarthritis: A systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to systematically review the evidence about the effect of diet or dietary supplements on spondyloarthritis (SpA) disease activity. METHODS: a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCOPUS according to the "PEO" format (Population, Exposure, Outcome). The population was SpA (axial or peripheral, axSpA/pSpA, including Psoriatic Arthritis-PsA); the intervention any kind of diet/dietary supplement; the outcome disease activity. Inclusion criteria were: adult patients, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and longitudinal studies (so that a pre-and post-intervention assessment were available), papers in English. Risk of bias (RoB) was conducted with different tools according to the design of the study. RESULTS: Literature search yielded 1390 publications, of which 15 were finally inlcuded: 12 interventional and 3 observational studies. Among those with the lower RoB: a) 2 RCTs, one at unclear and one at low RoB, failed to show benefit of probiotics in SpA b) Two RCTs at unclear RoB provided evidence that weight loss, but not hypocaloric diet, was associated to MDA achievement in PsA. The remaining interventional studies were at high RoB. Among the observational studies, one study on Mediterranean diet demonstrated an association between diet adherence and a ≥ 20% decrease of ASDAS in axSpA. The other two observational studies were judged of poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: weight loss seem to be able to impact disease activity in PsA, while probiotics do not seem useful in SpA; evidence for dietary behaviors is scarce and heterogeneous.

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination on inflammatory arthritis: a cohort study.

Objectives: To investigate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as short- (within 48 hours) and long-term (within 30 days) adverse events (AEs) of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including arthritis flares in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: A retrospective cohort study comprising 362 patients: 94 (26%) rheumatoid arthritis, 158 (43.6%) psoriatic arthritis and 110 (30.4%) ankylosing spondylitis; and 165 healthy controls (HC) to ascertain the prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IA, the rate of AEs associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and disease flares within a month of the vaccination. All patients provided informed consent and data about SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination status. Results: One-hundred-seventeen (32.3%) patients and 39 (23.6%) HC were affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Forty (34.2%) patients experienced an IA flare within one month of infection, of whom 3 (7.5%) needed to switch therapy. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease severity, and hospitalization rate were not significantly different. At least one shot of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was administered in 331 (91.4%) patients and 147 (89.1%) HC. Within 48 hours, 102 (30.8%) patients developed vaccine-related AEs; 52 (15.7%) patients with >1 vaccine dose experienced an IA flare-up, of whom 12 (23.1%) needed to switch therapy. Conclusions: A significantly higher rate of IA flare was observed among patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. those without infection. Patients with IA experienced flares after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, though it was not statistically significant.

Upadacitinib effectiveness and factors associated with minimal disease activity achievement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: preliminary data of a real-life multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this post-approval study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UPA over 24 weeks and identify clinical predictors of response, in a multicentric cohort of patients affected by PsA. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients with PsA treated with UPA were enrolled in 10 Italian centres. UPA effectiveness outcomes, such as the proportion of patients with MDA status, DAPSA remission, and low disease activity, ASDAS-CRP inactive and low disease activity, and change from baseline in DAPSA and ASDAS-CRP scores, were evaluated every 12 weeks until week 24. The proportion of DAPSA minor, moderate, and major improvement, and ASDAS clinically important improvement (CII) and major improvement (MI) were considered as well. All treatment-related adverse events were collected during the observation period. Clinical predictors of MDA response at week 24 were evaluated through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 124/126 (98%) and 54/126 (43%) patients showed peripheral and axial involvement, respectively; 110 (87%) patients were intolerant or resistant to biologic DMARDs.  At 24 weeks, MDA status, DAPSA remission, and ASDAS-CRP inactive disease were achieved in 47%, 23%, and 48% of patients, respectively. Minor, moderate, and major DAPSA improvement was observed in 67%, 39%, and 23%, respectively; while 65% and 35% achieved ASDAS-CRP CII and MI, respectively. The mean change from baseline was 15.9 ± 13.5 (p < 0.001) for DAPSA and 1.21 ± 0.97 (p < 0.001) for ASDAS-CRP. Thirteen patients (10%) discontinued UPA due to a lack of efficacy or non-serious adverse events. No serious adverse events were observed. Male gender (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.03-6.25 p = 0.043), being naïve to biological DMARDs (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.34-12.71, p = 0.013) and elevated baseline CRP (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.02-6.12, p = 0.046) were associated with MDA response at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first real-life studies supporting the effectiveness of UPA and its safety profile in PsA patients. Furthermore, the study identifies predictors of MDA response to UPA treatment at 6 months.