Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 39(5): 392-404, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36379456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different types of nerve conduits are used to bridge peripheral nerve gaps when a tension-free repair is unattainable. To best support nerve regeneration, naturally occurring conduits have been tested. Since allografts offer an unlimited source of epineurium, we have developed human epineural conduit (hEC) as a novel technology to bridge nerve gaps. Considering acellular properties, and lack of immunogenic response, epineurium-derived conduits represent an attractive material, when compared with nerve allografts that require systemic immunosuppression. In this study, we introduce the hEC as a novel naturally occurring material applied for repair of nerve gaps after trauma. METHODS: We tested the application of hEC created from human sciatic nerve in the restoration of 20 mm sciatic nerve defects in the nude rat model. Four experimental groups were studied: group 1: no repair control (n = 6), group 2: autograft control (n = 6), group 3: matched diameter hEC (n = 6), and group 4: large diameter hEC (n = 6). Functional tests of toe-spread and pin prick were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 weeks after repair. At 12 weeks, nerve samples were collected for immunostaining of Laminin B, S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), nerve growth factor (NGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), von Willebrand factor, and histomorphometric analysis of myelin thickness, axonal density, fiber diameter, and percentage of the myelinated nerve fibers. Muscle samples were gathered for gastrocnemius muscle index (GMI) and muscle fiber area ratio measurements. RESULTS: Best functional recovery, as well as GMI, was revealed for the autograft group, and was comparable to the matched hEC group. Significant differences were revealed between matched and large hEC groups in expression of S100 (p = 0.0423), NGF (p = 0.269), VEGF (p = 0.0003) as well as in percentage of myelinated fibers (p < 0.001) and axonal density (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: We established the feasibility of hEC creation. The innovative method introduces an alternative technique to autograft repair of nerve defects.


Assuntos
Fator de Crescimento Neural , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Ratos , Animais , Humanos , Nervo Isquiático/lesões , Transplante Homólogo/métodos , Regeneração Nervosa/fisiologia
2.
Stem Cell Rev Rep ; 18(2): 642-659, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34787795

RESUMO

Various therapeutic methods have been suggested to enhance nerve regeneration. In this study, we propose a novel approach for enhancement of nerve gap regeneration by applying human epineural conduit (hEC) supported with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC), as an alternative to autograft repair. Restoration of 20 mm sciatic nerve defect with hEC created from human sciatic nerve supported with hMSC was tested in 4 experimental groups (n = 6 each) in the athymic nude rat model (Crl:NIH-Foxn1rnu): 1 - No repair control, 2 - Autograft control, 3 - Matched diameter hEC filled with 1 mL saline, 4 - Matched diameter hEC supported with 3 × 106 hMSC. Assessments included: functional tests: toe-spread and pinprick, regeneration assessment by immunofluorescence staining: HLA-1, HLA-DR, NGF, GFAP, Laminin B, S-100, VEGF, vWF and PKH26 labeling; histomorphometric analysis of myelin thickness, axonal density, fiber diameter and myelinated nerve fibers percentage; Gastrocnemius Muscle Index (GMI) and muscle fiber area ratio. Best sensory and motor function recovery, as well as GMI and muscle fiber area ratio, were observed in the autograft group, and were comparable to the hEC with hMSC group (p = 0.038). Significant improvements of myelin thickness (p = 0.003), fiber diameter (p = 0.0296), and percentage of myelinated fibers (p < 0.0001) were detected in hEC group supported with hMSC compared to hEC with saline controls. At 12-weeks after nerve gap repair, hEC combined with hMSC revealed increased expression of neurotrophic and proangiogenic factors, which corresponded with improvement of function comparable with the autograft control. Application of our novel hEC supported with hMSC provides a potential alternative to the autograft nerve repair.


Assuntos
Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Regeneração Nervosa , Animais , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético , Regeneração Nervosa/fisiologia , Ratos , Nervo Isquiático/transplante , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA