Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 125(6): 827-835, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965694

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term oncological, functional and toxicity outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in relation to risk factors and radiation dose in a prospective multicentre cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of patients from 12 Swiss centres undergoing LDR-BT from September 2004 to March 2018 were prospectively collected. Patients with a follow-up of ≥3 months were analysed. Functional and oncological outcomes were assessed at ~6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after implantation and annually thereafter. LDR-BT was performed with 125 I seeds. Dosimetry was done 6 weeks after implantation based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise above the PSA nadir + 2 was defined as biochemical failure. Functional outcomes were assessed by urodynamic measurement parameters and questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 1580 patients in the database, 1291 (81.7%) were evaluable for therapy outcome. The median (range) follow-up was 37.1 (3.0-141.6) months. Better BRFS was found for Gleason score ≤3+4 (P = 0.03, log-rank test) and initial PSA level of <10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). D'Amico Risk groups were significantly associated with BRFS (P < 0.001), with a hazard ratio of 2.38 for intermediate- and high-risk patients vs low-risk patients. The radiation dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D90) after 6 weeks was significantly lower in patients with recurrence. Functional outcomes returned close to baseline levels after 2-3 years. A major limitation of these findings is a substantial loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results are in line with other studies showing that LDR-BT is associated with good oncological outcomes together with good functional results.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Suíça
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 191(10): 787-91, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26100965

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) with iodine 125 is an established curative treatment for localized prostate cancer. After treatment, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics may show a transient rise (PSA bounce). Our aim was to investigate the association of PSA bounce with biochemical control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with BT in Switzerland were registered in a prospective database. Only patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years were included in our analysis. Clinical follow-up and PSA measurements were assessed after 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. If PSA increased, additional follow-up visits were scheduled. Cases of PSA bounce were defined as a rise of at least 0.2 ng/ml above the initial PSA nadir with a subsequent decline to or below the initial nadir without treatment. Biochemical failure was defined as a rise to nadir + 2 ng/ml. RESULTS: Between March 2001 and November 2010, 713 patients with prostate cancer undergoing BT with at least 2 years of follow-up were registered. Median follow-up time was 41 months. Biochemical failure occurred in 28 patients (3.9 %). PSA bounce occurred in 173 (24.3 %) patients; only three (1.7 %) patients with PSA bounce developed biochemical failure, in contrast to 25 (4.6 %) patients without previous bounce (p < 0.05). The median time to bounce was 12 months, the median time to biochemical failure was 30 months. The median bounce increase was 0.78 ng/ml. Twenty-eight patients with bounce (16.5 %) had a transient PSA rise of + 2 ng/ml above the nadir. CONCLUSION: In most cases, an early increase in PSA after BT indicates PSA bounce and is associated with a lower risk of biochemical failure.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Braquiterapia , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Suíça
3.
BJU Int ; 111(6): 963-9, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23356829

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The occurence of lymphoceles in patients after radical prostatectomy is well known (2-10%). It appears that patients undergoing open extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy develop more lymphoceles than patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with transperitoneal access. The present study investigates in a prospective randomized manner whether the time of drainage (1 vs 7 days) makes a difference or whether drainage is even necessary. The study data, collected in the same institution, are compared with the incidence of lymphocele in patients treated by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether routine drainage is advisable after open extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) by measuring the incidence of lymphoceles and comparing these results with those of a series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and ePLND. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 331 consecutive patients underwent ePLND and RRP or RARP. The first 132 patients underwent open ePLND and RRP and received two pelvic drains; these patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 66), in which the drains were shortened on postoperative (PO) days 3 and 5 and removed on PO day 7, and group 2 (n = 66), in which the drains were removed on PO day 1. The next 199 patients were assigned to two consecutive groups not receiving drainage: group 3 (n = 73) undergoing open ePLND and RRP, followed by group 4 (n = 126) treated by transperitoneal robot-assisted ePLND and RARP. All patients had ultrasonographic controls 5 and 10 days and 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Lymphoceles were detected in 6.6% of all patients, 3.3% of whom were asymptomatic and 3.3% of whom were symptomatic. Symptomatic lymphoceles were detected in 0% of group 1, 8% of group 2, 7% of group 3 and 1% of group 4, with groups 2 and 3 differing significantly from group 4 (P < 0.05). In total, 5% of all patients undergoing open RRP (groups 1-3) had symptomatic lymphoceles vs 1% of patients undergoing RARP (group 4) (P = 0.06). Nodal-positive patients had significantly more symptomatic lymphoceles than nodal-negative patients (10% vs 2%) (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic lymphoceles occur less frequently after open RRP and pelvic drainage over 7 days than after open RRP and pelvic drainage over 1 day or without drainage. Patients undergoing RARP without drainage had significantly fewer lymphoceles than patients receiving open RRP without drainage.


Assuntos
Drenagem , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfocele/prevenção & controle , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Drenagem/métodos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfocele/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia
4.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 15(11): E582-E587, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999810

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is a complex surgical procedure, associated with substantial perioperative complications. Previous studies suggested reserving it to high-volume centers in order to improve oncological and perioperative outcomes. However, only limited data exist regarding low-volume centers with highly experienced surgeons. We aimed to assess oncological and perioperative outcomes after RC performed by experienced surgeons in the low-volume center of Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, CH. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 158 patients who underwent RC and PLND performed between 2009 and 2019 at a single low-volume center by three experienced surgeons, each having performed at least 50 RCs. Complications were graded according to the 2004 modified Clavien-Dindo grading system. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (70%) received an incontinent urinary diversion (ileal conduit or ureterocutaneostomy) and 48 patients (30%) received a continent urinary diversion (ileal orthotopic neobladder, ureterosigmoidostomy, or Mitrofanoff pouch). Median operating time was 419 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 346-461). Overall, at RC specimen, 71.5% of patients had urothelial carcinoma, 12.6% squamous, 3.1% sarcomatoid, 1.2% glandular, and 0.6% small cell carcinoma. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 23 (IQR 16-29.5). Positive margins were found in eight patients (5.1%). Overall five-year survival rate was 52.4%. The complication rate was 56.3%: 143 complications were found in 89 patients, 36 (22.8%) with Clavien ≥3. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: RC could be safely performed in a low-volume center by experienced surgeons with comparable outcomes to high-volume centers.

5.
Arab J Urol ; 18(3): 142-147, 2020 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33029423

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) ultrasound (US)-guided fusion biopsy (FB) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) under active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 47 patients under AS who consecutively underwent both FB and standard biopsy (SB), from May 2015 until November 2017. We defined FB as a transrectal US-guided biopsy based on mpMRI. The primary endpoint was to assess the rate of concordance between FB and SB in terms of diagnostic yield, as well as the rate of Gleason Score upgrading/downgrading between the two techniques. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was applied to test the concordance between FB and SB. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 20 (13-37) months. The median (IQR) number of cores taken was 13 (12-14) at SB and 4 (4-6) at FB. Overall, FB missed 12/47 (26%) PCa diagnoses compared to SB. There was concordance between SB and FB in 64% of the patients. The κ showed a perfect agreement between SB and FB for the detection of PCa with Gleason Score 4 + 4 and a weak concordance for negative biopsies ( κ : 0.46) and for PCa with a Gleason Score 4 + 3 ( κ : 0.54). There was Gleason Score upgrading at FB in two of 47 (4%) patients, whereas there was downgrading in three of 47 (6%) patients. CONCLUSION: In our present study, FB showed no superiority over SB for the detection of PCa. On the contrary, FB had a high rate of missed PCa compared to SB. Further studies are required to ascertain the role of FB in AS. ABBREVIATIONS: AS: active surveillance; FB: fusion biopsy; IL: index lesion; IQR: interquartile range; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (cs)PCa: (clinically significant) prostate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; PRIAS: Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance; ROI: region of interest; SB: standard biopsy.

6.
J Endourol ; 33(6): 455-462, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834782

RESUMO

Objective: To determine whether transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is safe and effective in patients under ongoing therapeutic oral anticoagulation (OAC) or antiplatelet drug (APD) therapy. Patients and Methods: We analyzed data on 276 consecutive TURP patients under ongoing APD therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (n = 130) or clopidogrel (n = 16) or ongoing OAC with phenprocoumon (n = 57), without stopping or bridging the medication, compared to 73 TURP patients without APD/OAC. Results: Outcomes of patients under acetylsalicylic acid were comparable to the controls. Under ongoing OAC therapy TURP patients tended to need slightly longer bladder irrigation (median 24 hours vs 22 hours, p = 0.06), needed longer transurethral catheterization (median 42 hours vs 24 hours, p = 0.031), were threefold more likely to have postoperative urinary retention (18% vs 6%, p = 0.04), had slightly longer hospital stays (median 4 days vs 3 days, p = 0.008), and tended to need more blood transfusions (9% vs 1%, p = 0.09), compared to controls. TURP patients under ongoing APD therapy with clopidogrel needed slightly longer bladder irrigation (median 24 hours vs 22 hours, p = 0.006), received more blood transfusions (19% vs 1%, p = 0.017), and had more rehospitalizations (19% vs 3%, p = 0.039). The significant functional improvement 1, 3, and 12 months after TURP was similar in all groups. Conclusions: Ongoing APD therapy with acetylsalicylic acid does not significantly impact TURP outcomes in terms of bleeding complications. Patients under ongoing therapeutic OAC with phenprocoumon or APD with clopidogrel can safely undergo TURP with an increased risk of bleeding complications, blood transfusions, and longer hospitalization.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Cumarínicos/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Femprocumona/uso terapêutico , Período Pré-Operatório , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Eur Urol ; 59(1): 1-6, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21035248

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) is performed worldwide, even in institutions with limited caseloads. However, although the results of large RALP series are available, oncologic and functional outcomes as well as complications from low-caseload centres are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes from two consecutive series of patients with localised prostate cancer treated by retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or recently established RALP in our hospital, which has a limited caseload. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients were enrolled. Their data and outcomes were collected and extensively evaluated. INTERVENTION: Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent RRP, and 75 consecutive patients underwent RALP, including all patients of the learning curve. MEASUREMENTS: Patient baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and complications were evaluated. End points were oncologic data (positive margins, prostate-specific antigen [PSA]), perioperative complications, urinary continence, and erectile function at 3- and 12-mo follow-up. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The preoperative parameters from the two groups were comparable. The positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were 32% for RRP and 16% for RALP (p=0.002). For RRP and RALP, the PSA value was <0.2 ng/ml in 91% and 88% of patients 3 mo postoperatively (p=0.708) and in 87% and 89% of patients 12 mo postoperatively (p=0.36), respectively. Continence rates for RRP and RALP were 83% and 95% at 3-mo follow-up (p=0.003) and 80% and 89% after 12-mo follow-up (p=0.092), respectively. Among patients who were potent without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) before RRP and RALP, recovery of erectile function with and without PDE5-Is was achieved in 25% (12 of 49 patients) and 68% (25 of 37 patients) 3 mo postoperatively (p=0.009) and in 26% (12 of 47 patients) and 55% (12 of 22 patients) 12 mo postoperatively (p=0.009), respectively. Minimal follow-up for RRP was 12 mo; median follow-up for the RALP group was 12 mo (range: 3-12). According to the modified Clavien system, major complication rates for RRP and RALP were 28% and 7% (p=0.025), respectively; minor complication rates were 24% and 35% (p=0.744), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a limited caseload and including the learning curve, RALP offers slightly better results than RRP in terms of PSM, major complications, urinary continence, and erectile function.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Curva de Aprendizado , Excisão de Linfonodo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/efeitos adversos , Suíça , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Carga de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA