A call to action for outpatient antibiotic stewardship.

OBJECTIVES: To address the public health threat of antibiotic resistance, there has been an enhanced call for antibiotic stewardship programs throughout the health care continuum. SUMMARY: While antibiotic stewardship programs have been well described in the inpatient setting, data on effectiveness and guidance on implementing outpatient programs is scarce. Establishing stewardship practices in the outpatient setting is necessary because more than 60% of human antibiotic use occurs in this setting. CONCLUSION: In this article, we highlight the importance and need for stewardship in the outpatient setting, discuss strategies for the development of stewardship teams, and discuss potential metrics that can be used to assess effectiveness of antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Outpatient antibiotic stewardship: Interventions and opportunities.

Improving the use of antibiotics across the continuum of care is a national priority. Data outlining the misuse of antibiotics in the outpatient setting justify the expansion of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) into this health care setting; however, best practices for outpatient antibiotic stewardship (AS) are not yet defined. In a companion article, we focused on recommendations to overcome challenges related to the implementation of an outpatient ASP (e.g., building the AS team and defining program metrics). In this document, we outline AS interventions that have demonstrated success and highlight opportunities to enhance AS in the outpatient arena. This article summarizes examples of point-of-care testing, policies and interventions, and education strategies to improve antibiotic use that can be used in the outpatient setting.

Use of an Anti-Infective Medication Review Process at Hospital Discharge to Identify Medication Errors and Optimize Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation is a major patient safety concern, and the impact of a structured process to evaluate anti-infective agents at hospital discharge warrants further review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to (1) describe a structured, multidisciplinary approach to review anti-infectives at discharge and (2) measure the impact of a stewardship-initiated antimicrobial review process in identifying and preventing anti-infective-related medication errors (MEs) at discharge. METHODS: A prospective study to evaluate adult patients discharged on anti-infectives was conducted from October 2013 to May 2014. The antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) classified interventions on anti-infective regimens into predefined ME categories. RESULTS: Forty-five patients who were discharged on 59 anti-infective prescriptions were included in the study. The most common indications for anti-infective regimens at discharge were pneumonia (22%, n = 10), bacteremia (18%, n = 8), and skin and soft tissue infections (16%, n = 7). An ME was identified in 42% (n = 19/45) of anti-infective regimens. Seventy percentage of ASP team recommendations were accepted which resulted in an avoidance of MEs in 68% (n = 13/19) of patients with an ME prior to discharge. CONCLUSION: This study describes the outcomes of a stewardship-initiated review process in preventing MEs at discharge. Developing a systematic process for a multidisciplinary ASP team to review all anti-infectives can be a valuable tool in preventing MEs at hospital discharge.

Significant Publications on Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy in 2017.

PURPOSE: The most significant peer-reviewed articles pertaining to infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy, as selected by panels of ID pharmacists, are summarized. SUMMARY: Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) were asked to nominate peer-reviewed articles that they believed most contributed to the practice of ID pharmacotherapy in 2017, including the areas of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). A list of 33 articles related to general ID pharmacotherapy and 4 articles related to HIV/AIDS was compiled. A survey was distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) for the purpose of selecting 10 articles believed to have made the most significant impact on general ID pharmacotherapy and the single significant publication related to HIV/AIDS. Of 524 SIDP members who responded, 221 (42%) and 95 (18%) members voted for general pharmacotherapy- and HIV/AIDS-related articles, respectively. The highest ranked articles are summarized below. CONCLUSION: Remaining informed on the most significant ID-related publications is a challenge when considering the large number of ID-related articles published annually. This review of significant publications in 2017 may aid in that effort.