RESUMO
Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria have been increasingly reported. Simple and sensitive methods for carbapenemase detection are still needed. In this study, a gold nanoparticle (AuNP) solution was modified by the addition of zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) for improving the conventional GoldNano Carb (cGoldC) test, and the modified GoldC (mGoldC) test was then evaluated for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates. ZnSO4 was added to give final concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mM. The performance of the mGoldC test was evaluated in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from six hospitals in different regions using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a gold standard. The AuNP solution with 0.25 mM ZnSO4 was used for the mGoldC test. Evaluation of the mGoldC test in 495 Enterobacterales, 212 Acinetobacter spp., and 125 P. aeruginosa isolates (including 444 carbapenemase producers and 388 non-carbapenemase producers) revealed sensitivity, specificity, a positive likelihood ratio, and a negative likelihood ratio of 98.6%, 98.2%, 54.7, and 0.01, respectively. This test is fast, easy to perform, cost-effective (~0.25 USD per test), and highly sensitive and specific for routine carbapenemase detection, thus leading to effective antimicrobial therapy and infection control measures.
RESUMO
We modified rapid polymyxin Nordmann-Poirel (RPNP) test, called rapid colistin disk elution (RCDE) test, for detecting colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacilli and evaluated its performance compared with colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The RCDE test was performed by using a 10-µg colistin disk in 2.7 mL volume (final colistin concentration of 3.7 µg/mL) of either cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth or phenol red broth base media with bacterial inoculum of 1-µL loop, and 1-4 and 16-20 hr incubation for Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, respectively. Both tests were evaluated in 236 Enterobacteriaceae and 49 A. baumannii isolates using broth microdilution as reference method. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, categorical agreement and very major error (VME or false intermediate susceptibility) rate were 98.3% and 5.4%, respectively, for the RCDE test, compared with 97.9% and 7.1%, respectively, for the CBDE test. Both tests had major error (ME or false resistance) rate of 0.6%. For the A. baumannii isolates, the RCDE and CBDE tests gave high VME rates of 8.3% and 16.7%, respectively. The RCDE test showed good performance comparable with the CBDE test but is cheaper and more rapid (3 hr) and convenient, thus suggesting as an alternative for detecting colistin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in low-income countries.