The efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency ablation combined with Lenvatinib plus Sintilimab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). However, the overall prognosis remains suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable HCC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were included and divided into two cohorts: RFA combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab (R-L-S group) and lenvatinib plus sintilimab (L-S group). The primary efficacy endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Adverse events were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods for the entire cohort were 14.0 months. The R-L-S group (n = 60) had a significantly higher ORR than those with L-S alone (n = 62) (40.0% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.022). Moreover, patients in the R-L-S group had improved median PFS (12 vs. 8 months; p = 0.013) and median overall survival (24 vs. 18 months; p = 0.037), as compared with lenvatinib and sintilimab alone. No significant difference in treatment related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade between the two groups. The most common TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 were fatigue 10.0% (6/60) and hand-foot skin reaction 10.0% (6/60) in the R-L-S group and hand-foot skin reaction 11.3% (7/62) in the L-S group. CONCLUSION: In unresectable HCC patients, the incorporation of RFA to lenvatinib plus sintilimab demonstrated improved efficacy without compromising safety compared with lenvatinib plus sintilimab alone.

Regorafenib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in the second-line setting for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice.

Background: Most advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases administered molecular targeted agents and/or anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have no response or develop resistance. Moreover, second-line therapies still cannot provide beneficial clinical outcomes. A pilot study assessing combined regorafenib and PD-1 inhibitor as second-line treatment of advanced HCC reported promising effectiveness. Methods: The current single-center, retrospective, real-world study was carried out between January 2019 and July 2021. Advanced HCC cases were administered second-line regorafenib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor or regorafenib alone were assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were determined. Results: Totally 46 HCC cases were analyzed, most of whom underwent previous systemic treatment comprising targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated in 25 and 21 individuals in the regorafenib + PD-1 inhibitor and regorafenib monotherapy groups, respectively: ORRs were 21.7% and 8.7%, and DCRs were 47.8% and 32.6%, respectively. Median PFS was markedly longer in the regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitor group (11.5 months) compared with the regorafenib monotherapy group (5.1 months, P=0.049). Conclusions: This study suggested regorafenib and a PD-1 inhibitor in combination may provide significant clinical benefits in HCC cases showing progression following first-line treatment. Further analysis in real-world studies with large cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.

Open Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Splenectomy and Pericardial Devascularization vs. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Hypertension and Hypersplenism: A Case-Matched Comparative Study.

AIM: To compare the short- and long-term treatment outcomes of open radiofrequency ablation combined with splenectomy and pericardial devascularization versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism. METHODS: During the study period, the treatment outcomes of consecutive HCC patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism who underwent open radiofrequency ablation, splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (the study group) were compared with the treatment outcomes of a case-matched control group of HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 32 patients, and the control group comprised 32 patients selected from 155 patients who were case-matched by tumor size, age, gender, MELD sore, tumor location, TNM classification, degree of splenomegaly and Child-Pugh staging. Baseline data on preoperative laboratory tests and tumor characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 43.2 ± 5.3 months and 44.9 ± 5.8 months for the study and control groups, respectively. Although the disease-free survival rates of the control group were better than those of the study group (P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in the cumulative overall survival time or the incidence of portal vein thrombosis between the two groups (P = 0.670, 0.083). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, and lower incidences of postoperative pleural effusion and pneumonia (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Open radiofrequency ablation, splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for small HCCs with portal hypertension and hypersplenism can be an alternative therapy for a subset of carefully selected patients under the shortage of liver donors.

Genomic profiling, prognosis, and potential interventional targets in young and old patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Molecular mechanisms behind potentially inferior prognosis of old cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients are unclear. Prevalence of interventional targets and the difference between young and old CCA patients are valuable for promising precision medicine. A total of 188 CCA patients with baseline tumor tissue samples were subgrouped into the young (≤45 years) and old (>45 years) sub-cohorts. Somatic and germline mutation profiles, differentially enriched genetic alterations, and actionable genetic alterations were compared. An external dataset was used for the validation of molecular features and the comparison of overall survival (OS). Compared to young patients, KRAS alterations were more common in old patients (P = .04), while FGFR2 fusions were less frequent (P = .05). TERT promoter mutations were exclusively detected in old patients. The external dataset (N = 392) revealed no significant difference in OS between young and old patients; however, old patient-enriched KRAS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.80) and TERT alterations (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.22-3.38) were associated with inferior OS. Approximately 38.3% of patients were identified of actionable oncogenic mutations indicative of a potential response to targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Actionable FGFR2 fusions (P = .01) and BRAFV600E (P = .04) mutations were more frequent in young females than old patients. The enrichment of KRAS/TERT alterations in CCA patients over 45 years resulted in inferior OS. Approximately one-third of CCA patients were eligible for targeted therapy or immunotherapy given the actionable mutations carried, especially young females.

Safety of Low-calcium Dialysate and its Effects on Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.

To determine the safety of low-calcium-dialysate in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and its effects on coronary artery calcification (CAC) and analyze clinical risk factors for CAC. A total of 174 MHD patients were recruited and randomly divided into two groups: high-calcium dialysate (HCD, 1.5 mmol/L Ca2+) and low-calcium dialysate (LCD, 1.25 mmol/L Ca2+). Changes in CAC score (CACS) and cardiac function were evaluated using spiral computed tomography and echocardiography, respectively. Clinical and laboratory parameters were measured. Intra-dialysis adverse reactions were recorded and compared between the two groups. CACS was significantly lower in the LCD group than in the HCD group by the end of the study. Cardiac E/Amax was significantly higher in the LCD group than in the HCD group by the end of the study. There was no significant difference in the frequency of any intra-dialysis adverse reactions between the two groups during the study. LCD is helpful in maintaining cardiac diastolic function and postponing CAC progression. LCD does not increase intra-dialysis adverse reactions. Age may be the most important factor impacting CAC in MHD patients.