Surgical management of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: Is appendectomy sufficient?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Due to the rarity of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs), there are few established treatment guidelines. The clinical course varies from incidental detection to progressive spread with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). This study investigated the extent of resection on the prognosis and outcomes of AMNs. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients with AMN who underwent surgery between 4/2006 to 9/2017. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Secondary endpoints included PMP incidence and treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). RESULTS: Of the 138 patients with AMN, 70 patients (54%) underwent appendectomy, 26 (19%) cecectomy, and 37 (27%) right hemicolectomy. The median age was 59.7 years and 57 patients (41%) were male. Males were less likely to undergo cecectomy (P = .03). Rupture rates, tumor characteristics, and incidence of PMP were similar across surgery groups. Median follow-up was 61.3 months. Five-year OS and DSS for the total cohort were 94.9% and 98.6%, respectively, and remained similar across all surgery groups. CRS patients were more likely to undergo right hemicolectomy with no difference in survival by surgery type (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AMN have a good overall prognosis and there may be minimal benefit to performing extended surgical resection in these patients.

Pasireotide is not effective in reducing the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

BACKGROUND: In a single trial, perioperative pasireotide demonstrated reduction in postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatectomy, yet recent studies question the efficacy of this drug. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2014 and August 2017 at a single institution were prospectively followed. Starting in February 2016, pasireotide was administered to all pancreatectomies. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients were additionally risk-stratified using a validated clinical risk score. The primary endpoint was the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), and was compared between patients who received pasireotide and controls. RESULTS: Of 116 patients, 87 patients (75%) underwent PD, and 43 patients (37.1%) received pasireotide. CR-POPF occurred in 28.4% patients. The use of pasireotide was not associated with reduced CR-POPF among the total cohort (25.6% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.599), distal pancreatectomy patients (P = 0.339), PD (P = 0.274), or PD patients with elevated risk scores (P = 0.073). Pasireotide did not decrease hospital length of stay, use of parenteral nutrition, delayed gastric emptying, surgical site wound infection, or readmission rate. CONCLUSION: Use of pasireotide after pancreatic resection does not decrease CR-POPF, nor is it associated with reduced length of stay or postoperative complications. A multi-center randomized trial is warranted to study its true effect on outcomes after pancreatectomy.