Use of 3-D digital subtraction rotational angiography during cardiac catheterization of infants and adults with congenital heart diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality, radiation and contrast doses required to obtain 3D-Digital subtraction rotational angiography (3D-DSRA) with 3D-Digital rotational angiography (3D-DRA) in infants (children ≤ 2 years of age) and adults with congenital heart diseases (ACHD). BACKGROUND: 3D-DRA can be performed with radiation doses comparable to bi-plane cine-angiography. However, 3D-DRA in infants requires a large contrast volume. The resolution of 3D-DRA performed in ACHD patients is limited by their soft tissue density. We hypothesized that the use of 3D-DSRA could help alleviate these concerns. METHODS: Radiation (DAP) and contrast doses required to obtain 3D-DSRA was compared with 3D-DRA in 15 age-, size-, and intervention-matched infants and 15 ACHD patients. The diagnostic quality and utility of these two modalities were scored by 4 qualified independent observers. RESULTS: Both in infants and adults, the median contrast volume for 3D-DSRA was lower than 3D-DRA (0.98 vs. 1.81 mL/kg; P < 0.001 and 0.92 vs. 1.4 mL/kg; P < 0.001, respectively) with an increased DAP (median: 188 vs. 128 cGy cm2 ; P = 0.068 and 659 vs. 427 cGy cm2 ; P = 0.045, respectively). The diagnostic quality and utility scores for rotational-angiography, and 3D-reconstruction were superior for 3D-DSRA (score = 94 vs. 80%, P = 0.03 and 90 vs.79%, P = 0.01, respectively) and equivalent for multi-planar-reformation and 3D-roadmapping in ACHD patients compared with 3D-DRA. All scores for both modalities were equivalent for infants. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-DSRA can be acquired using lower contrast volume with a mildly higher radiation dose than 3D-DRA in infants and ACHD patients. The diagnostic quality and utility scores for 3D-DSRA were higher in ACHD patients and equivalent for infants compared with 3D-DRA.

Left thoracic sympathectomy in a premature infant with long QT syndrome and heart failure.

Left thoracic sympathectomy has been shown to be an effective treatment for adults with long QT syndrome who are refractory to medical therapy. We report the successful use of left thoracic sympathectomy for the management of a 10-week-old premature baby with long QT syndrome and heart failure from a large ventricular septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus.

Influence of weight at the time of first palliation on survival in patients with a single ventricle.

BACKGROUND: Numerous advances in surgical techniques and understanding of single-ventricle physiology have resulted in improved survival. We sought to determine the influence of various demographic, perioperative, and patient-specific factors on the survival of single-ventricle patients following stage 1 palliation at our institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all single-ventricle patients who had undergone staged palliation at our institution over an 8-year period. Data were collected from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery database and from patient charts. Information on age, weight at stage 1 palliation, prematurity, genetic abnormalities, non-cardiac anomalies, ventricular dominance, and type of palliation was collected. Information on mortality and unplanned reinterventions was also collected. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients underwent stage 1 palliation over an 8-year period. There were 12 deaths before and one death after stage 2 palliation. There was no hospital mortality following Glenn or Fontan procedures. On univariate analysis, low weight at the time of stage 1 palliation and prematurity were found to be risk factors for mortality following stage 1 palliation. However, multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed weight at stage 1 palliation to be a strong predictor of mortality. The type of stage 1 palliation did not have any influence on the outcome. No difference in survival was noted following the Glenn procedure. CONCLUSION: Low weight has a deleterious impact on survival following stage 1 palliation. This is mitigated by stage 2 palliation. The type of stage 1 palliation itself has no bearing on the outcome.