RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Determine the correlation between post-sympathetic block temperature change and immediate- and intermediate-term pain relief. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Academic setting. SUBJECTS: Seventy-nine patients with complex regional pain syndrome who underwent sympathetic block. METHODS: Pre- and post-block temperatures in the affected extremity and pain scores immediately (based on 6-hour pain diary) after the block and at the intermediate-term 4- to 8-week follow-up were recorded. Post-block pain reductions of 30-49% and ≥50% were designated as partially sympathetically maintained pain and sympathetically maintained pain, respectively. A decrease in pain score ≥2 points lasting ≥4 weeks was considered a positive intermediate-term outcome for sympathetic block. RESULTS: A weak correlation was found between immediate-term pain relief and the extent of temperature rise for the cohort (R = 0.192, P = 0.043). Greater immediate-term pain reduction was reported among patients who experienced a temperature increase ≥7.5°C (mean 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33 to 4.76) than among those who experienced a temperature increase <2°C (2.3; 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.31) or ≥2°C to <7.5°C (2.9; 95% CI: 1.8 to 3.9; P = 0.036). The correlations between temperature increase and intermediate-term pain score reduction at 4-8 weeks (R = 0.052, P = 0.329) and between immediate- and intermediate-term pain relief (R = 0.139, P = 0.119) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A weak correlation was found for those who experienced greater temperature increases after the block to also experience greater immediate pain relief. Higher temperature increase cutoffs than are typically used might be necessary to determine whether a patient with complex regional pain syndrome has sympathetically maintained pain.
Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa , Distrofia Simpática Reflexa , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Humanos , Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , TemperaturaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H-MRS) has been largely based on choline metabolites; however, other relevant metabolites can be detected and monitored. PURPOSE: To investigate whether lipid metabolite concentrations detected with 1 H-MRS can be used for the noninvasive differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors, differentiation among molecular breast cancer subtypes, and prediction of long-term survival outcomes. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: In all, 168 women, aged ≥18 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T: sagittal 3D spoiled gradient recalled sequence with fat saturation, flip angle = 10°, repetition time / echo time (TR/TE) = 7.4/4.2 msec, slice thickness = 3.0 mm, field of view (FOV) = 20 cm, and matrix size = 256 × 192. 1 H-MRS: PRESS with TR/TE = 2000/135 msec, water suppression, and 128 scan averages, in addition to 16 reference scans without water suppression. ASSESSMENT: MRS quantitative analysis of lipid resonances using the LCModel was performed. Histopathology was the reference standard. STATISTICAL TESTS: Categorical data were described using absolute numbers and percentages. For metric data, means (plus 95% confidence interval [CI]) and standard deviations as well as median, minimum, and maximum were calculated. Due to skewed data, the latter were more adequate; unpaired Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to compare groups without and with Bonferroni correction. ROC analyses were also performed. RESULTS: There were 111 malignant and 57 benign lesions. Mean voxel size was 4.4 ± 4.6 cm3 . Six lipid metabolite peaks were quantified: L09, L13 + L16, L21 + L23, L28, L41 + L43, and L52 + L53. Malignant lesions showed lower L09, L21 + L23, and L52 + L53 than benign lesions (P = 0.022, 0.027, and 0.0006). Similar results were observed for Luminal A or Luminal A/B vs. other molecular subtypes. At follow-up, patients were split into two groups based on median values for the six peaks; recurrence-free survival was significantly different between groups for L09, L21 + L23, and L28 (P = 0.0173, 0.0024, and 0.0045). DATA CONCLUSION: Quantitative in vivo 1 H-MRS assessment of lipid metabolism may provide an additional noninvasive imaging biomarker to guide therapeutic decisions in breast cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:239-249.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Espectroscopia de Prótons por Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Idoso , Meios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Objective: To investigate if histogram analysis and visually assessed heterogeneity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping can predict molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancers. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 91 patients with invasive breast carcinoma who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI at our institution were included. Two radiologists delineated a 2-D region of interest (ROI) on ADC maps in consensus. Tumors were also independently classified into low and high heterogeneity based on visual assessment of DWI. First-order statistics extracted through histogram analysis within the ROI of the ADC maps (mean, 10th percentile, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, standard deviation, kurtosis, and skewness) and visually assessed heterogeneity were evaluated for associations with tumor receptor status (ER, PR, and HER2 status) as well as molecular subtype. Results: HER2-positive lesions demonstrated significantly higher mean (p=0.034), Perc50 (p=0.046), and Perc90 (p=0.040), with AUCs of 0.605, 0.592, and 0.652, respectively, than HER2-negative lesions. No significant differences were found in the histogram values for ER and PR statuses. Neither quantitative histogram analysis based on ADC maps nor qualitative visual heterogeneity assessment of DWI images was able to significantly differentiate between molecular subtypes, i.e., luminal A versus all other subtypes (luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple negative) combined, luminal A and B combined versus HER2-enriched and triple negative combined, and triple negative versus all other types combined. Conclusion: Histogram analysis and visual heterogeneity assessment cannot be used to differentiate molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer.