Histotype predicts the curative potential of radiotherapy: the example of ovarian cancers.

BACKGROUND: To explore the influence of ovarian cancer histotype on the effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: A review of a population-based experience included all referred women with no reported macroscopic residuum following primary surgery who underwent adjuvant platin-based chemotherapy (CT), with or without sequential RT, and for whom it was possible to assign histotype according to the contemporary criteria. RESULTS: Seven hundred and three subjects were eligible, of these 351 received RT. For those with apparent stage I and II tumors, the cohort with clear cell (C), endometrioid (E), and mucinous (M) disease who additionally received RT exhibited a 40% reduction in disease-specific mortality and a 43% reduction in overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The curability of those with stage I and II C-, E-, and M-type ovarian carcinomas was enhanced by RT-containing adjuvant therapy. This benefit did not extend to those with stage III or serous tumors. These findings necessitate reassessments of the role of RT and of the nonselective surgical and CT approaches that have characterized ovarian cancer care.

Exploring palliative treatment outcomes in women with advanced or recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary is increasingly recognized as responding poorly to chemotherapy (CT). This review examines the outcomes achieved with a variety of CT regimens, looking for evidence of activity that might guide the development of more effective treatments. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all cases of CCC referred to the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 2000 and 2008 was conducted. Data were collected from those with primarily advanced disease and from those who recurred after adjuvant treatment. Outcomes were measured using broad definitions of treatment benefit (any objective or subjective evidence of disease control) in order to reflect the real-life use of palliative therapy. RESULTS: There were 158 women with pure CCC. First-line therapy for advanced disease was delivered to 33 patients. Second- and third-line treatment was delivered to 47 and 25 patients, respectively. The total number of treatment courses was 105: 88 CT-alone courses, 14 radiation therapy (RT)-alone and 3 combined modality. Treatment benefit was recorded in 24% of patients receiving CT, 64% of patients receiving RT, and each who received combined modality treatment. There was no CT drug class identified as obviously efficacious. CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced or recurrent CCC have a low benefit-to-failure ratio from palliative CT. The role of RT and targeted agents must be explored to improve clinical outcomes for such patients.

Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen as the new "standard," a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. METHODS: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan-Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The overall clinical response rate was 59% in the paclitaxel group and 45% in the cyclophosphamide group; the complete clinical remission rates were 41% and 27%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P =.01 for both). At a median follow-up of 38.5 months and despite a high rate of crossover (48%) from the cyclophosphamide arm to the paclitaxel arm at first detection of progression of disease, a longer progression-free survival (log-rank P =.0005; median of 15.5 months versus 11.5 months) and a longer overall survival (log-rank P =. 0016; median of 35.6 months versus 25.8 months) were seen in the paclitaxel regimen compared with the cyclophosphamide regimen. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong and confirmatory evidence from two large randomized phase III trials to support paclitaxel-cisplatin as the new standard regimen for treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer treated with combination chemotherapy.

Six hundred nineteen patients with metastatic breast cancer, treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, or close variations of this program, with or without immunotherapy were analyzed retrospectively to identify those host, tumor, or treatment characteristics that might be of prognostic importance in predicting response to chemotherapy and survival from onset of the 5-fluorouracil-Adriamycin-cyclophosphamide treatments. Primary tumor characteristics such as size of primary, number of axillary nodes involved, stage at diagnosis, and type of surgery used for primary treatment were not found to be of prognostic significance. Host characteristics such as age, menstrual status, or family history of breast cancer were similarly unrelated to outcome. Non-Caucasian patients had a lower response rate and somewhat shorter survival than did Caucasians. Pretreatment weight loss, poor performance status, and abnormal biochemical and hematological values were of adverse prognostic significance. An estimate of total extent of disease based on criteria for rating extent of involvement at 12 potential sites was a much more important prognostic factor related to response and survival than actual sites of involvement or the traditional "dominant site" classification. There was a trend, however, for patients with bone involvement to have a longer survival than did patients with metastases to other organ sites. Shorter survival times were observed among patients exposed to extensive prior radiotherapy and those who failed to respond to prior hormonal treatment. The prognostic variables identified in this paper should be used for the design and comparison of clinical trials in the future.

Oral etoposide is active against platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether etoposide (VP16) is more effective when administered on a chronic schedule, women with clinically defined platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) were studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one eligible women were treated with oral VP16. The first seven received a dose that varied depending on their body-surface area, but this proved too toxic, and so a fixed dose of 100 mg orally per day for 14 days every 3 weeks was used for the other subjects. RESULTS: The response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11% to 41%). The 28 women with cancer that had progressed while they were receiving a platinum analog had a response rate of 21% (95% CI, 6% to 36%). Response durations were short. CONCLUSION: When administered on this chronic schedule, VP16 has activity against platinum-resistant EOC.

Impact of cyclophosphamide on relationships between carboplatin exposure and response or toxicity when used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine (1) the impact of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on previously defined relationships between carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and indices of toxicity and response in women with advanced ovarian cancer; and (2) the relationships between indices of cumulative drug exposure and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Carboplatin AUC = dose/(creatinine clearance [CCr] + 25) and was calculated in 224 women who received carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The likelihood of grade 3 or greater myelotoxicity at any carboplatin AUC was compared with the likelihood of myelotoxicity at the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. The nadir count predicted using the University of Maryland single-agent carboplatin dosing formula was compared with the nadir count observed. Received and relative-received dose-intensity were calculated. Carboplatin exposure-intensity was defined by substituting cumulative carboplatin exposure for total dose. Relationships were sought between these indices and therapeutic outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia at any carboplatin AUC was greater for the two-drug combination than for single-agent carboplatin. The platelet nadir in 83% of patients was less than or equal to the nadir predicted for the same single-agent carboplatin AUC. Despite a narrow range of received dose-intensities, carboplatin exposure-intensity was distributed over a twofold range. There were no relationships between received and relative-received dose-intensity or carboplatin exposure-intensity and time to progression or survival. CONCLUSION: Any carboplatin AUC when administered with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 produces greater myelotoxicity than the same AUC of single-agent carboplatin. Received carboplatin dose-intensity underestimates the range of plasma drug exposure resulting from a fixed carboplatin dosing regimen. Whether higher carboplatin exposures can improve outcome requires prospective validation.

Ten-year outcome of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with cisplatin-based multimodality therapy.

PURPOSE: At the end of the 1970s it was thought that advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) could be cured by multimodality treatment using surgery, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT). Such multimodality treatment was used as standard therapy at our institution. Our long-term results are reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-five previously untreated patients with stage III or IV EOC were treated between April 1979 and December 1982. All patients were to have debulking surgery, when feasible, followed by the administration of doxorubicin and cisplatin at 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until a total dose of doxorubicin of 450 mg/m2 had been reached. RT was used in addition in patients with disease remaining after the chemotherapy. Maintenance chemotherapy with oral cyclophosphamide and hexamethylmelamine (altretamine) was administered to patients who did not have a documented histologic complete remission. RESULTS: The 10-year overall and failure-free survivals were 4% and 8%, respectively. The median overall survival was 2 years. The achievement of a histologic complete response (n = 32) did not equate to cure because 20 (63%) of the patients eventually relapsed. Multivariate analysis identified residual disease of greater or less than 2 cm as the only independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our multimodality treatment program was noncurative for the majority of the patients. Innovative therapies are needed before we can hope to cure such disease.

Small-cell carcinoma of the cervix: fourteen years of experience at a single institution using a combined-modality regimen of involved-field irradiation and platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combined-modality regimen of irradiation with platinum-based combination chemotherapy in small-cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with SCCC were seen and treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency between May 1988 and November 2002. Two protocols were used, SMCC (May 1988 to December 1995) and SMCC2 (January 1996 to November 2002). Both protocols used cisplatin, etoposide, and involved-field irradiation (essentially pelvis plus or minus para-aortics) with concurrent chemotherapy. In addition, SMCC2 included carboplatin and paclitaxel, and the para-aortics were irradiated routinely. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received either SMCC (n = 17) or SMCC2 (n = 14), and three patients did not (disease too extensive, n = 1; patient refusal, n = 1; and alternative regimen, n = 1). For the 31 patients treated on one of the protocols, the 3-year overall and failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 60% and 57%, respectively. The results were equivalent for SMCC and SMCC2. Radiologic stage was the only independent predictor for FFS (80% at 3 years for stage I and II patients v 38% at 3 years for stage III and IV patients). Distant failure (28%) was the most common cause of failure, with local failure occurring in 13% of patients. The switch to SMCC2 did not improve efficacy but did lessen the toxicity. CONCLUSION: SCCC can be successfully treated in approximately 55% of patients with a combination of irradiation and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease extent predicts for chance of curability.

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer.

Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on data collected from the records of 619 patients with metastatic breast cancer in whom an Adriamycin-containing chemotherapeutic regimen was used. Using a forward, stepwise logistic regression procedure, several models or equations in which a small number of pretreatment factors were incorporated were generated and the probability of response to therapy was accurately predicted. The predictive ability of these models was tested retrospectively in 546 of the 619 patients from whom the data were derived and prospectively in a new population of 200 patients with metastatic breast cancer also treated with a therapeutically equivalent Adriamycin combination. Using similar univariate techniques, pretreatment factors were correlated with the length of survival after therapy. The proportional hazard model of Cox was used to develop a regression model relating survival to pretreatment characteristics in much the same manner as that of the response model. The total population of the initial group of patients was divided according to four levels of hazard ratio, and survival distributions were compared. This model also was tested progressively and its predictive capability was confirmed. The prediction of individual outcome is a valuable capability in the comparison of clinical trials and the continuing evaluation of biologic changes in patients with metastatic carcinoma; such a method is described in this paper.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four distinct patient groups received carboplatin (area under the curve, 5 to 7) plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) for 3 hours at 4-week intervals: group 1 (n = 21), patients with primarily advanced, nonpapillary serous cancers; group 2 (n = 20), the same as group 1 but with papillary serous cancers; group 3 (n = 18), recurrent, nonpapillary serous cancers; and group 4 (n = 4), recurrent, papillary serous cancers. Involved-field irradiation was used in groups 1 and 2 for those with radioencompassable disease. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated. Response rates to chemotherapy in the assessable patients in the four groups were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51% to 100%); 60% (95% CI, 35% to 85%), 56% (95% CI, 34% to 78%), and 50%, respectively. Nineteen patients (90%) in group 1 also were irradiated, and the median failure-free survival time for all 21 patients was 23 months, with a 62% 3-year overall survival rate. Eleven patients (55%) in group 2 were irradiated, and the median failure-free survival time for all 18 patients was 18 months, with a 39% 3-year overall survival rate. The median failure-free interval in the patients in group 3 was 6 months, with a 15-month median overall survival time. Toxicity was manageable, reversible, and predominantly hematologic. Two patients developed neutropenic fever, and three patients, including these two, were hospitalized for complications. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin-paclitaxel is an efficacious, low-toxicity regimen for managing primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers.

European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion.

PURPOSE: Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) is a new anticancer agent with activity in a number of human tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer. In nonrandomized trials, doses studied have ranged from 135 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours with premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). This study addressed two questions: the dose-response relationship of Taxol in relapsed ovarian cancer and the safety of a short infusion given with premedication. METHODS: Women with platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized in a bifactorial design to receive either 175 or 135 mg/m2 of Taxol over either 24 or 3 hours. Major end points were the frequency of significant HSRs and objective response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 407 patients randomized, 391 were eligible and 382 assessable for response. Analysis was performed according to the bifactorial design. Severe HSRs were rare (1.5% patients) and were not affected by either dose or schedule. Response was slightly higher at the 175-mg/m2 dose (20%) than at 135 mg/m2 (15%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .2). However, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group (19 v 14 weeks; P = .02). Significantly more neutropenia was seen when Taxol was administered as a 24-hour infusion. Response rates were similar in the 24- and 3-hour groups (19% and 16%, respectively; P = .6). No survival differences were noted. CONCLUSION: The 3-hour infusion of Taxol is safe when given with premedication and is associated with less neutropenia. There is a modest dose effect with longer time to progression at 175 mg/m2. The observation that longer infusion produces more myelosuppression but does not yield higher response rates should lead to further studies to determine the optimal dose and schedule of this interesting new agent.

Carboplatin in the treatment of carcinoma of the ovary: the National Cancer Institute of Canada experience. Ovarian Cancer Subcommittee.

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group has used carboplatin in two studies in women with ovarian carcinoma. In a phase II study, carboplatin produced a clinical response rate of 28% among patients with tumor persistence or recurrence following one prior cisplatin-containing regimen. Carboplatin was most efficacious in those with smaller tumors, in those who had the best responses to prior cisplatin therapy, and in those with longer intervals between the primary cisplatin treatment and the secondary carboplatin course. In this setting, a starting dose of 320 mg/m2 is suggested. A phase III randomized trial of first-line therapy compared the efficacy of cyclophosphamide/cisplatin with cyclophosphamide/carboplatin. Four hundred eighteen eligible patients were enrolled. The regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy; however, the carboplatin-based regimen was more easily administered and caused less symptomatic toxicity. The long-term results in this population with macroscopic residual disease remain disappointing.

Modeling toxicity and response in carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Data from women with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV) were analyzed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy. With the equation area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) = dose/(creatinine clearance + 25), carboplatin AUC was calculated in each of up to six treatment cycles in 224 women with advanced ovarian cancer who had been randomized to receive carboplatin 300 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. In addition, for each patient, the predicted nadir count (obtained by rearranging the University of Maryland single-agent carboplatin dosing formula) was compared with the actual observed nadir count, received and relative received dose intensities were calculated, and carboplatin exposure intensity was defined. Relationships were sought between these treatment indices and the clinical outcomes of time to progression and survival. When combined with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, any carboplatin AUC was found to be associated with greater myelotoxicity and a higher likelihood of both leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurring than had been determined for single-agent carboplatin. Furthermore, the platelet nadir in 83% of patients was equal to or below that predicted to result from the same dose of single-agent carboplatin. There was a relatively narrow range of received dose intensities within this patient population, but carboplatin exposure intensity was calculated as being distributed over a two-fold range within the population. Therefore, received carboplatin dose intensity underestimates the range of plasma drug exposure associated with a fixed dosing regimen of carboplatin. However, there were no consistent relationships between received dose intensity, relative received dose intensity, or carboplatin exposure intensity and the clinical outcomes of time to progression or survival. The relationships between carboplatin exposure and the pharmacodynamic measures of toxicity and response are likely to require definition in each regimen that includes carboplatin and for each tumor type treated.

Ovarian carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Five hundred and fifty six women with invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma were assessed for postoperative treatment between 1966 and 1976. The records of this group were reviewed retrospectively. Sixteen characteristics of the patient and tumor were analyzed for prognostic significance by univariate and multivariate techniques. Tumor grade, the presence of residual disease, and patient performance status are identified as stage-specific independent prognostic factors. These independent factors define patient subsets with good, intermediate, and poor prognosis within each stage. The results show that more effective treatment strategies are required for patients in poor prognosis subsets. Estimates of tumor grade, extent of residual disease, and performance status should be included in reports of treatment outcome.

A phase II trial of intravenous etoposide (VP-16-213) in epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin: clinical and serological evidence of activity.

Etoposide (VP16) was administered intravenously at a dose of 150 mg/m2 daily for 2 days every 2 weeks to 24 patients with progressing epithelial ovarian carcinoma which was resistant to platinum analogues. Using standard response criteria there were five clinical partial responses (21%, 95% confidence limits 5-37%) and three disease stabilizations. However, the aim of our study was to determine if etoposide was non-cross-resistant with platinum analogues and therefore we also developed additional response criteria based on serial CA 125 levels. This was to enable us to differentiate within the heterogeneous group of responses that form the stable disease category. Nine of 23 patients (39%, 95% confidence limits 19-59%) demonstrated a fall (all rising prior to etoposide) and of these, three had a serologic partial remission (65% or greater fall). The serologic and clinical responses were strongly correlated. Falling CA 125 levels occurred in the eight patients with either clinical partial responses or disease stabilizations.

Platinum plus cyclophosphamide plus radiotherapy is superior to platinum alone in 'high-risk' epithelial ovarian cancer (residual negative and either stage I or II, grade 3, or stage III, any grade).

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) referred to our institution are stratified into risk groups based on their stage, grade and presence of residual cancer, with a specific treatment policy for each group. One-hundred and thirty-one patients with no visible residual tumor following primary surgery and either stage I, grade 3; stage II, grade 3; or stage III, any grade EOC were treated between November 1983 and the end of December 1991. Regimen A (cisplatin 75 mgm-2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mgm-2 intravenously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles with abdominopelvic irradiation between cycles 3 and 4) was used until April 1989 and was then replaced with Regimen B (cisplatin 75 mgm-2 intravenously every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). The 5-year actuarial overall and failure-free survivals were 78% and 64% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified increasing stage and treatment with Regimen B as independent adverse prognostic factors for failure-free survival. The importance of treatment regimen reached statistical significance for the stage I patients (P = 0.04) but not stage II (P = 0.11) or stage III (P = 0.79). It is possible to undertreat EOC as shown by the inferior results achieved with Regimen B (single agent cisplatin) compared to Regimen A (cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, irradiation). This effect of treatment regimen was particularly important for the lower-stage patients. Our postulate is that treatment resistant clones are less regularly present in lower-stage patients, and that a certain minimum amount of treatment is required to eliminate all the sensitive cancer.

'Moderate-risk' ovarian cancer (stage I, grade 2; stage II, grade 1 or 2) treated with cisplatin chemotherapy (single agent or combination) and pelvi-abdominal irradiation.

We placed patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer into four distinct prognostic groups: 'low', 'moderate', 'high' and 'extreme' risk. The 'moderate-risk' group contained all residual negative, stage I and II patients with two exceptions: stage Ia or b, grade 1 cancers and grade 3 cancers. They were treated with primary surgery, usually including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy and omentectomy. Chemotherapy was then given (cisplatin at 100 mg m-2 every 2 weeks for three cycles) followed by pelvi-abdominal irradiation (2250 cGy in 10 fractions to the pelvis and 2250 cGy in 22 fractions to the whole abdomen including pelvis). An early cohort with ascites or positive washings instead received six cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide at 75 mg m-2 and 600 mg m-2 every 4 weeks with the same pelvi-abdominal irradiation sandwiched between cycles 3 and 4. One-hundred and nine patients were treated between November 1983 and December 1989. Median follow-up was 4.7 years (range 0.7-9 years). The 5-year actuarial overall and failure-free survivals were 81% and 76%, respectively. Chronic toxicity, although usually minor, included 15% with peripheral neuropathy or ototoxicity and 23% with chronic abdominal complaints. Our combined-modality results are similar to those obtained by other centers utilizing either pelvi-abdominal irradiation alone or cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone.

A phase II trial of mitomycin in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin.

Intravenous bolus mitomycin was given at a dose of 10-12 mg/m2 to patients with epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin. There were three (12%) partial responses and no complete responses in the 25 patients so treated.

Taxol is active in platinum-resistant endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Taxol, 170 mg/m2 by 3-h infusion every 3 weeks, was administered to seven patients with primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with progressive disease on platinum analogues. By standard response criteria, there were three clinical responders (43%; 95% confidence limits, 6-80%) and one disease stabilization. All three responses were clinical partial responses. The response duration ranged from 3 to 7 months. These preliminary results suggest that taxol is active in patients with platinum-resistant endometrial adenocarcinoma.