Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 19898, 2022 11 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400912

RESUMO

The only official method that can detect the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals, including the elicitation response, is the OECD test guideline (TG) 406. However, this guideline uses guinea pigs, which requires complex procedures. Since a simple and complete test method for evaluating skin sensitization is needed, especially for mechanistic studies of skin sensitization, this study confirmed the reactivity of mice to skin sensitizing substances. We set up a protocol involving one induction exposure of the test substance to the back skin, followed by three challenge exposures to the auricle (Protocol 2), and compared their skin sensitization responses with the results of two exposures to the auricle and back skin every 2 weeks (Protocol 1) and a local lymph node assay (TG442B). A hapten 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene caused significant auricular thickening, skin inflammation, and enlarged auricular lymph nodes in Protocols 1 and 2. These changes were more pronounced in Protocol 2. Plasma IgE and IgG1 and gene expression of IL4, IFNγ, and perforin were significantly increased in Protocol 2. Cell proliferation in the auricular lymph nodes was observed in both protocols as in TG442B. These results indicate that Protocol 2 can be a good candidate for a relatively simple skin sensitization test.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Ensaio Local de Linfonodo , Camundongos , Cobaias , Animais , Testes Cutâneos/efeitos adversos , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Haptenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Pele
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA