Impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study uses four institutional data. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven breast cancer, diagnosed BM with gadolinium-enhanced MRI, a Karnofsky performance status of 60 or higher, and radiotherapy for all BM lesions between 2017 and 2022. Patients with leptomeningeal dissemination were excluded. Concurrent ADC was defined as using ADC within four weeks before or after radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of SRN until December 2023 with death as a competing event was compared between the groups with and without concurrent ADC. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: Among the 168 patients enrolled, 48 (29%) received ADC, and 19 (11%) had concurrent ADC. Of all, 36% were HER2-positive, 62% had symptomatic BM, and 33% had previous BM radiation histories. In a median follow-up of 31 months, 18 SRNs (11%) were registered (11 in grade 2 and 7 in grade 3). The groups with and without concurrent ADC had 5 SRNs in 19 patients and 13 SRNs in 149, and the two-year cumulative incidence of SRN was 27% vs. 7% (P = 0.014). Concurrent ADC was associated with a higher risk of SRN on multivariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.3], P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that concurrent ADC and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of SRN in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Retrospective non-inferiority study of stereotactic radiosurgery for more than ten brain metastases.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with > 10 brain metastases (BM) compared to patients with 2-10 BM. METHODS: The study included multiple BM patients who underwent SRS between 2014 and 2022, excluding patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy, had a Karnofsky Performance Status score < 60, suspected leptomeningeal disease, or a single BM lesion. Patients were divided into two groups (2-10 and > 10 BM groups) and matched 2:1 based on propensity scores. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the matched dataset, with intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoint. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the adjusted hazard ratio was below 1.3. RESULTS: Of the 1042 patients identified, 434 met eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (160 in the BM 2-10 group and 80 in the > 10 BM group). The median OS was 18.2 months in the 2-10 BM group and 19.4 months in the > 10 BM group (P = 0.60). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.59-1.24), indicating non-inferiority. PFS was not significantly different between the groups (4.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.94). The number of BM did not significantly impact OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for selected patients with > 10 BM was non-inferior in terms of OS compared to those with 2-10 BM in a propensity score-matched dataset.

Recent trends of characteristics and treatments in adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate recent trends in characteristics and treatments among patients with brain metastases in clinical practice. METHODS: All newly diagnosed patients with brain metastases during 2016-2021 at a single cancer center were enrolled. We collected the detailed features of each patient and estimated the number of candidates considered to meet the following criteria used in common clinical trials: Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 and mutated non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer or melanoma. The brain metastases treatments were classified as follows: (i) stereotactic radiosurgery, (ii) stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy, (iii) whole-brain radiotherapy, (iv) whole-brain radiotherapy and systemic therapy, (v) surgery, (vi) immune checkpoint inhibitor or targeted therapy, (vii) cytotoxic agents and (ix) palliative care. Overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival were estimated from brain metastases diagnosis to death or intracranial progression. RESULTS: A total of 800 brain metastases patients were analyzed; 597 (74.6%) underwent radiotherapy, and 422 (52.7%) underwent systemic therapy. In addition, 250 (31.3%) patients were considered candidates for common clinical trials. Compared to 2016, the later years tended to shift from whole-brain radiotherapy to stereotactic radiosurgery (whole-brain radiotherapy: 35.7-29.1% and stereotactic radiosurgery: 33.4-42.8%) and from cytotoxic agents to immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy (cytotoxic agents: 10.1-5.0 and immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy: 7.8-10.9%). There was also an increase in the proportion of systemic therapy combined with radiation therapy (from 26.4 to 36.5%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 12.7 and 5.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the diversity of brain metastases patient characteristics, recent changes in treatment selection and the percentage of candidates in clinical trials.

Radiotherapy or systemic therapy versus combined therapy in patients with brain metastases: a propensity-score matched study.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of systemic therapy (ST) combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM). METHODS: The patient data were extracted from the institutional disease database from 2016 to 2021. Surgical and whole-brain radiotherapy cases and poor Karnofsky performance status (KPS < 70) were excluded. The eligible patients were divided into monotherapy (SRS alone or ST alone) and combined therapy (SRS and ST, combined within a month). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of death and intracranial progression. The propensity score for selecting treatment was calculated based on existing prognostic covariates. Two groups were matched 1:1 and compared for intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 1605 patients and analyzed 928 (monotherapy: n = 494, combined therapy: n = 434). In a multivariable model, the combined therapy was independently associated with improved PFS and OS relative to the monotherapy. At the median follow-up of 383 days in the matched dataset, the combined therapy group showed significantly longer PFS (median, 7.4 vs. 5.0 months, P < 0.001) and OS (median, 23.1 vs. 17.2 months, P = 0.036) than the monotherapy group. The overall intracranial progression and mortality risk was reduced in the combined therapy group, with an estimated HR of 0.70 and 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy exhibited longer PFS and OS than monotherapy in BM patients. The results support the recent trend toward combining systemic and local therapies, encouraging future clinical trials.

Examination of the best head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose maintaining a safe level of lens dose in whole-brain radiotherapy using the four-field box technique.

The parotid gland is recognized as a major-risk organ in whole-brain irradiation; however, the beam delivery from the left and right sides cannot reduce the parotid gland dose. The four-field box technique using a head-tilting device has been reported to reduce the parotid gland dose by excluding it from the radiation field. This study aimed to determine the appropriate head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose in the four-field box technique. The bilateral, anterior, and posterior beams were set for each of ten patients. The orbitomeatal plane angle (OMPA) was introduced as an indicator that expresses the head tilt angle. Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to understand the interrelationship between variables (dosimetric parameters of the lens and parotid gland and OMPA). In PCA, the angle between the OMPA vector and maximum lens dose or mean parotid gland dose vector was approximately opposite or close, indicating a negative or positive correlation [r = -0.627 (p < 0.05) or 0.475 (p < 0.05), respectively]. The OMPA that reduced the maximum lens dose to <10 Gy with a 95% confidence interval was approximately 14°. If the lens dose was not considered, the parotid gland dose could be reduced by decreasing the OMPA.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Intraoperative Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer: Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: We performed a multicenter phase II study on the efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as partial breast irradiation using multiple devices. METHODS: The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Key inclusion criteria were T < 2.5 cm, age > 50 years, surgical margin > 1 cm, intraoperative pathologically free margins, and sentinel node negative. After resection of the tumor, radiation at 21 Gy was delivered directly to the mammary gland employing an electron linear accelerator in the operating room, otherwise the patient was transported from the surgical suite to the radiation room. RESULTS: Overall, 142 patients were enrolled in this study and 129 underwent IORT. Stage 0: n = 4 (3.1%); stage I: n = 98 (76.0%); and stage IIA: n = 27 (20.9%). Luminal type: n = 116 (89.9%); triple-negative: n = 9 (7.0%); and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: n = 4 (3.1%). Median follow-up time was 59.5 months (range 27.5-99.0), and the rate of IBTR was 3.1% (95% confidence interval 0.9-7.8). The toxicities included fibrosis in deep-connective tissue: grade 1, 78.1%; wound infection: grade 3, 1.6% and grade 2, 1.6%; and soft tissue necrosis: grade 3, 0.8% and grade 2, 0.8%. Recurrence in the breast occurred in four cases; the site of recurrence was just under the skin near the primary tumor site, with similar histology and subtype. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter phase II study, the rate of IBTR was low and IORT at 21 Gy was feasible in properly selected patients. It is important to use a careful surgical technique to reduce local recurrence because the skin is not included in the radiation field of IORT.

Development of twist-correction system for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients.

To propose a concept for correcting the twist between the head and neck and the body frequently occurring in radiotherapy patients and to develop a prototype device for achieving this. Furthermore, the operational accuracy of this device under no load was evaluated. We devised a concept for correcting the twist of patients by adjustment of the three rotation (pitch, roll, and yaw) angles in two independent plates connected by a joint (fulcrum). The two plates (head and neck plate and body plate) rotate around the fulcrum by adjusting screws under each of them. A prototype device was created to materialize this concept. First, after all adjusting screws were set to the zero position, the rotation angle of each plate was measured by a digital goniometer. Repeatability was evaluated by performing 20 repeated measurements. Next, to confirm the rotational accuracy of each plate of the prototype device, the calculated rotation angles for 20 combinations of patterns of traveled distances of the adjusting screws were compared with those measured by the digital goniometer and cone-beam computed tomography (CT). The repeatability (standard deviation: SD) of the pitch, roll, and yaw angles of the head and neck plate was 0.04°, 0.05°, and 0.03°, and the repeatability (SD) of the body plate was 0.05°, 0.04°, and 0.04°, respectively. The mean differences ± SD between the calculated and measured pitch, roll, and yaw angles for the head and neck plate with the digital goniometer were 0.00 ± 0.06°, -0.01 ± 0.06°, and -0.04 ± 0.04°, respectively. The differences for the body plate were -0.03 ± 0.04°, 0.03 ± 0.05°, and 0.02 ± 0.05°, respectively. Results of the cone-beam CT were similar to those of the digital goniometer. The prototype device exhibited good performance regarding the rotational accuracy and repeatability under no load. The clinical implementation of this concept is expected to reduce the residual error of the patient position due to the twist.

Impact of treatment planning using a structure block function on the target and organ doses related to patient movement in cervical esophageal cancer: A phantom study.

Helical tomotherapy (HT) can restrict beamlets passing through the virtual contour on computed tomography (CT) image in dose optimization, reducing the dose to organs at risk (OARs). Beamlet restriction limits the incident beamlet angles; thus, the proper planning target volume (PTV) margin may differ from that of the standard treatment plan without beamlet restriction, depending on the patient's movement during dose delivery. Dose distribution changes resulting from patient movement have not been described for treatment plans with beamlet restriction. This study quantified changes in dose distribution to the target and OARs when beamlet restriction is applied to cervical esophageal cancer treatment plan using HT by systematically shifting a phantom. Treatment plans for cervical esophageal cancers with and without beamlet restriction modes [directional block (DB) and nonblock (NB), respectively] were designed for CT images of the RANDO phantom. The PTV margin for the DB mode was set to be the same as that for the NB mode (5 mm). The CT image was intentionally shifted by ±1, ±2, and ±3 voxels in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions, and the dose distribution was recalculated for each position using the fluence for the NB or DB mode. When the phantom shift was within the same PTV margin as the NB mode, changes in doses to the targets, lungs, heart, and spinal cord in the DB mode were small as those in the NB mode. In conclusion, the virtual contour shape used in this study would provide safe delivery even with patient movement within the same PTV margin as for the NB mode.

Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization-mediated vasodilatation compensates nitric oxide-mediated endothelial dysfunction during ischemia in diabetes-induced canine coronary collateral microcirculation in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: It has been previously demonstrated that endothelial caveolin-1 plays crucial roles to produce an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in mouse mesenteric arteries. We examined whether this mechanism is involved in the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization-mediated responses to compensate reduced NO-mediated responses in diabetes mellitus during coronary occlusion in dogs in vivo. METHODS: Canine subepicardial collateral coronary small arteries (≥100 µm) and arterioles (<100 µm) were observed by an intravital microscope. Experiments were performed during occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (90 minutes) under the following conditions (n = 6 each); (i) control, (ii) diabetes mellitus, and (iii) diabetes mellitus+L-NMMA+KCa channel blockade. Vascular and myocardial levels of caveolin-1, eNOS, and caspase-3 were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Caveolin-1 levels in the ischemic area were greater in coronary microvessels than in conduit arteries in the control group. NO-mediated coronary vasodilatations of small arteries to bradykinin did not increase in diabetes mellitus associated with decreased eNOS phosphorylation at Ser1177 compared with baseline of controls and were restored by compensation of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and were suppressed by KCa channel blockade. CONCLUSIONS: NO-mediated vasodilatations of small coronary arteries during coronary occlusion are impaired in diabetes mellitus and are compensated by endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of arterioles in dogs in vivo.

Gross tumor volume in sinonasal tract cancer as a predictor of local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether gross tumor volume of the primary tumor before treatment was a predictor for local recurrence in patients with resectable sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma who were treated by chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 24 patients were enrolled. Pretreatment gross tumor volume of primary tumor was assessed by palpitation, perception and imaging. The cut-off value of the gross tumor volume for local recurrence was determined by receiver-operating curve analysis. A log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses with adjustment for the clinical T category (cT1-T4a/cT4b), respectively. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, patients with the gross tumor volume ≥83.7 ml were significantly associated with shorter local recurrence-free rate (P = 0.0023) and disease-free survival (P = 0.0064) than those with gross tumor volume <83.7 ml. In the multivariate analysis, gross tumor volume ≥83.7 ml were significantly associated with shorter local recurrence-free rate (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment gross tumor volume of primary tumor ≥83.7 ml was significantly associated with local recurrence-free rate in resectable sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma.

Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and toxicities of radical hysterectomy (RH) and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on FIGO stage IIB patients who underwent RH with adjuvant radiotherapy (surgery group) or intended to receive CRT (CRT group). The distributions of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for the 2 groups based on age, tumor diameter, histological type, and pelvic node metastasis in pretreatment imaging tests. RESULTS: Median follow-up times were 58 months in the surgery group (n = 75) and 55 months in the CRT group (n = 65). Propensity score matching identified 37 patients with similar characteristics from each group. Significant differences were observed in the ratio of the chemotherapy combination between the surgery and CRT groups before (47% vs 98%) and after PSM (51% vs 100%). Five-year DFS rates were slightly higher in the surgery group than in the CRT group before PSM (69% vs 58%, P = 0.30) but were similar after PSM (76% vs 82%, P = 0.36). Five-year OS rates were similar between the surgery and CRT groups before (70% vs 75%, P = 0.59) and after PSM (78% vs 77%, P = 0.97). The results of multivariate analyses also showed that neither DFS nor OS was associated with the treatment modalities regardless of PSM. The incidence of late toxicities grade 2 or greater was similar between the surgery and CRT groups before (17% vs 23%, P = 0.31) and after PSM (19% vs 24%, P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that RH with adjuvant radiotherapy and definitive CRT are equivalent treatment options for patients with FIGO stage IIB cancer. However, prospective larger studies are needed to confirm this.

Comparisons of the clinical outcomes of different postoperative radiation strategies for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We previously reported unfavorable locoregional control with limited field postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients and thus revised the strategy to cover the whole neck. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Patients' outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of two treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Before 2010, the clinical target volume covered the tumor bed and/or involved the neck region. Since 2011, whole-neck irradiation was planned. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and propensity score matching were performed. The study included 275 patients: 186 received limited field postoperative radiotherapy and 89 received whole-neck postoperative radiotherapy. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 40.8 months. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the radiation strategy had no significant effect on overall survival and progression-free survival. In multivariate analysis, whole-neck postoperative radiotherapy was a favorable factor for overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control. Propensity score matching resulted in a cohort comprising 118 well-matched patients evenly divided between the limited field postoperative radiotherapy and whole-neck postoperative radiotherapy groups. Whole-neck postoperative radiotherapy group achieved a significantly better 2-year overall survival (56.4% vs. 78.1%; P = 0.003), 2-year progression-free survival (34.7% vs. 59.8%; P = 0.009), and 2-year locoregional control (54.4% vs. 83.2%; P < 0.001). The limited field postoperative radiotherapy group developed significantly more locoregional recurrences both in-field (35.2% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.003) and out-of-field (25.0% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) in the matched-pair cohort. CONCLUSION: Whole-neck postoperative radiotherapy is a more appropriate choice than limited field postoperative radiotherapy to improve overall survival, progression-free survival and locoregional control.

Clinical outcome of definitive radiation therapy for superficial esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in superficial esophageal cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data for 123 patients with superficial esophageal cancer who received external beam radiotherapy without intracavitary brachytherapy plus systemic chemotherapy during 1998-2015. Elective nodal irradiation was not performed. The dosage to planning treatment volume was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The main outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 66 (41-83) years; male/female ratio, 106/17; squamous cell carcinoma/other, 122/1; cT1a/cT1b, 27/96; cervical esophagus/upper thoracic esophagus/middle thoracic esophagus/lower thoracic esophagus, 7/9/66/41 and concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy alone, 100/23. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were the most commonly used agents (85%). At the last follow-up (median 60.5 months), 91 (74%) patients were alive. Complete response was achieved in 116 (94.4%) patients. The 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival and local control rates were 77.0, 46.9 and 62.7%, respectively, similar to that in the elderly patients (P = 0.878, 0.754 and 0.648, respectively). There were 55 failures: 42 local, 10 regional and 3 distant failures. Nine local and seven regional failures developed out-of-field. Thirty-eight local failures (90%) were successfully salvaged, of which 30 (71%) were salvaged via endoscopic removal; only 2 regional failures (20%) were salvaged. Fifteen G3 acute toxicities occurred. One pneumonitis (G3), one pneumothorax (G3) and two pericardial effusion (G2) were the late toxicities observed. There were no G4 toxicities or treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy without intracavitary brachytherapy was effective and safe for superficial esophageal cancer, even in elderly patients.

Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy.

A low modulation factor (MF) maintaining a good dose distribution contributes to the shortening of the delivery time and efficiency of the treatment plan in helical tomotherapy. The purpose of this study was to reduce the delivery time using initial values and the upper limit values of MF. First, patients with head and neck cancer (293 cases) or prostate cancer (181 cases) treated between June 2011 and July 2015 were included in the analysis of MF values. The initial MF value (MFinitial ) was defined as the average MFactual value, and the upper limit of the MF value (MFUL ) was defined according the following equation: MFUL = 2 × standard deviation of MFactual value + the average MFactual Next, a treatment plan was designed for patients with head and neck cancer (62 cases) and prostate cancer (13 cases) treated between December 2015 and June 2016. The average MFactual value for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases decreased from 2.1 to 1.9 (p = 0.0006), 1.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 2.0 to 1.7 (p < 0.0001), and 1.8 to 1.6 (p = 0.0004) by adapting the MFinitial and the MFUL values, respectively. The average delivery time for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases also decreased from 19.9 s cm-1 to 16.7 s cm-1 (p < 0.0001), 15.0 s cm-1 to 13.9 s cm-1 (p = 0.025), 15.1 s cm-1 to 13.8 s cm-1 (p = 0.015), and 23.6 s cm-1 to 16.9 s cm-1 (p = 0.008) respectively. The delivery time was shortened by the adaptation of MFinitial and MFUL values with a reduction in the average MFactual for head and neck cancer and prostate cancer cases.

Clinical results of definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: retrospective analysis of treatment efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: Ninety-three oropharyngeal carcinoma patients histopathologically diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma and treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy between January 2006 and December 2013 were analyzed. Planning target volume primary and involved nodes was delivered 66-70 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction, while planning target volume prophylactic was delivered 54 Gy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique. RESULTS: The median follow-up period among the surviving patients was 40 months (range, 13-96). There were 76 males and 17 females with a median age of 60 years (range, 34-80). The disease was Stage II in 13%, Stage III in 10% and Stage IV in 77% of patients. Ninety-two patients received chemotherapy (99%); 68 patients received induction chemotherapy (73%), while 21 received concurrent chemotherapy (23%). The 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and locoregional control rates were 80, 68 and 79%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified an advanced T-category (T3-4), having double cancer, and smoking habit as significantly unfavorable factors for overall survival, progression-free survival and both progression-free survival and locoregional control, respectively. Only two patients who achieved disease control required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in the last follow-up. The rate of Grade 2 xerostomia at 2 years was 23%. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma provided not only sufficient efficacy, but also preserved parotid function.

Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Previously untreated 204 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Of note, 66-70 Gy was delivered to the primary and involved nodes and 36-54 Gy was delivered to the prophylactic lymph node using standard fractionated radiotherapy. One hundred and forty-six patients received induction chemotherapy as a larynx preservation strategy, followed by definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was also performed after 2006. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of this cohort was 43.4 months (range; 6.9-151.0). The 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and larynx preservation survival rates were 78.8% (95% confidence interval; 73.0-85.0), 58.4% (95% confidence interval; 51.8-65.9) and 67.5% (95% confidence interval; 61.0-74.7), respectively. Multivariate analyses identified the following significant prognostic factors: an advanced age, the T category and N category for overall survival, the T category and N category for progression-free survival and the T category for larynx preservation survival. Acute toxicities of Grade 3 or higher were observed in 47 patients (23.0%). Two patients (1.0%) had Grade 4 pharyngeal edema. Suspicious treatment-related death due to lethal pharyngeal hemorrhage occurred in 1 (0.4%) patient. The rates of Grade 2 xerostomia in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy were 28.1, 17.4 and 9.5% at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of definitive chemoradiotherapy are considered feasible with sufficient laryngeal preservation.

The Charlson comorbidity index is a prognostic factor in sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: High Charlson comorbidity index values have been reported to be associated with shorter overall survival in various types of cancer. We investigated whether Charlson comorbidity index values were correlated with overall survival in patients with resectable sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with resectable sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma were treated with curative intent. The Charlson comorbidity index values were calculated by the summation of the weight scores of 19 medical conditions (other than sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma) before treatment. The survival rate was analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. RESULTS: According to a univariate analysis, a Charlson comorbidity index value ≥6 was found to be significantly correlated with shorter overall survival (P < 0.02). In the multivariate survival analysis with adjustment for the clinical T and N classification, age, sex, anatomical location, treatment group (radiotherapy/surgery) and chemotherapy (presence/absence), a Charlson comorbidity index value ≥6 was found to be associated with the significantly shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the Charlson comorbidity index functions as a prognostic factor in cases of resectable sinonasal tract squamous cell carcinoma.

Multicenter phase II study of an oral care program for patients with head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II trial assessed the clinical benefit of a multidisciplinary oral care program in reducing the incidence of severe chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who were scheduled to receive definitive or postoperative chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. The oral care program included routine oral screening by dentists and a leaflet containing instructions regarding oral care, nutrition, and lifestyle. Oral hygiene and oral care were evaluated continuously during and after the course of chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥3 OM assessed by certified medical staff according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.0. RESULTS: From April 2012 to December 2013, 120 patients with HNC were enrolled. Sixty-four patients (53.3 %) developed grade ≥3 OM (i.e., functional/symptomatic). The incidence of grade ≤1 OM at 2 and 4 weeks after radiotherapy completion was 34.2 and 67.6 %, respectively. Clinical examination revealed that 51 patients (42.5 %) developed grade ≥3 OM during chemoradiotherapy. The incidence of grade ≤1 OM at 2 and 4 weeks after radiotherapy completion was 54.7 and 89.2 %, respectively. The incidences of grade 3 infection and pneumonitis throughout chemoradiotherapy were <5 %. Only 6.7 % of patients had unplanned breaks in radiotherapy, and 99.2 % completed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic oral care program alone is insufficient to decrease the incidence of severe OM in patients with HNC being treated with chemoradiotherapy. However, systematic oral care programs may indirectly improve treatment compliance by decreasing infection risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000006660.

Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: Our intent was to compare survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Information about 406 consecutive esophageal cancer patients with resectable disease who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil or who underwent definitive CRT was reviewed. The survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Relevant variables were included in the propensity score model. RESULTS: Overall, 206 patients planned to undergo surgery (S group) and 200 patients planned to undergo CRT (CRT group). In the unadjusted situation, progression-free survival and overall survival did not differ statistically between the groups. After matching, both survival outcomes were better in the S group compared to the CRT group. Subanalysis showed both survival outcomes were better in the S group for patients with only stage III disease. However, survival outcomes for stages I, II, and IV were not significantly different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable disease, survival outcomes in the S group were favored over those of the CRT group. These results indicate that different therapeutic strategies should be used for stage III esophageal cancer than for other stages.

Efficacy of palliative radiotherapy for gastric bleeding in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding negatively impacts quality of life in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer and has the potential to be lethal. When blood transfusion and endoscopic hemostasis are unsuccessful to stop bleeding, radiation to stomach is selected in patients with unsuitable condition for surgery. We performed a retrospective cohort study to clarify the utility of radiotherapy in treating gastric bleeding, particularly for patients with limited life expectancy. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of palliative radiotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer between January 2007 and December 2012 in Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. All patients had gastric bleeding requiring blood transfusion. We defined hemostasis as an increase in hemoglobin level to more than 7.0 g/dL together with the cessation of melena or hematemesis for at least 1 week. RESULTS: During the study period, 313 advanced gastric cancer patients treated in our institution. Of these 17 patients received gastric radiotherapy to stop bleeding. Two patients were excluded from analysis due to combined treatment of intravascular embolization. Eleven out of 15 patients (73 %) had undergone two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Ten patients (67 %) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3 and 14 patients (93 %) were in palliative prognostic index group B or C. The median total planned radiation dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. At a median interval of 2 days after initiation of radiotherapy, 11 patients (73 %) achieved hemostasis; rebleeding was observed in four patients (36 %). The median hemoglobin level before radiotherapy was significantly increased from 6.0 to 9.0 g/dL (p < 0.0001). The median volume of red blood cell transfusion was significantly decreased from 1120 to 280 mL (p = 0.007). The median rebleeding-free survival interval was 27 days, with a median overall survival of 63 days. The cause of death was bleeding in 1 patient (7 %) and cancer progression without bleeding in 12 patients (80 %). There were no severe adverse events attributable to radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative radiotherapy for gastric bleeding achieves hemostasis within a short time frame. This appears to be a useful treatment option, especially for patients with end-stage, unresectable advanced gastric cancer.