Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The coexistence of atrial fibrillation (AF) with heart failure (HF) is prevalent, leading to severe complications. This review aimed to investigate the success rate and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) by measuring the improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and the effect on the left ventricular systolic function in patients with AF accompanied by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Electronic databases search included PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in January 2023. Outcomes addressed the following: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, AF recurrence, NYHA classification improvement, and mortality. STATA 17.0 software was used for data analysis. The effect size for the studies was a standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for outcomes. Proportion analysis with 95% CI was used for freedom from early AF and AF after 2 years and all-cause death. We included six studies, including 1699 HF patients with 365 HFrEF patients. The SMD of postoperative LVEF compared to preoperative LVEF in HFrEF was 0.99 ([95% CI: 0.60, 1.39], p = .00), and for NYHA was -1.12 ([95% CI: -1.36, -0.87], p = .00). The analysis results in HFrEF patients for freedom from AF after 1 year was 65% ([95% CI: 0.55, 0.75], and after 2 years was 39% ([95% CI: 0.10, 0.67]). Proportional analysis was conducted for all-cause death, resulting in 3% mortality ([95% CI: -0.01, 0.07]). Cryoablation of AF accompanied by HFrEF appeared safe as it reduced AF recurrence and enhanced clinical outcomes.

The efficacy of intranasal oxytocin in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disease. Oxytocin is a neuropeptide hormone that impacts fear, and social recognition. Intranasal administration of oxytocin can be utilized to treat PWS patients. The results of published trials assessing the effects of intranasal oxytocin in PWS are variable. The current systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of oxytocin in Prader-Willi patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to March 2022 for relevant interventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effect of oxytocin in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome. We assessed the quality of included trials using the Cochrane tool risk of bias 1. We performed the meta-analysis with Revman software version 5.4. In addition, we visualized our results using forest plots. We assessed the heterogeneity by using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: Relevant to hyperphagia, the data extracted in three studies comprising 92 patients did not show positive outcomes of oxytocin compared to placebo (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.44, 0.80; P = 0.56). Three studies that included 94 patients revealed no significant effects regarding weight between oxytocin and placebo (MD = 0.30; 95% CI: -0.22, 0.83; P = 0.25). The Aberrant Behaviour Checklist found that group-administered oxytocin improved behaviour compared to their counterpart who received a placebo. CONCLUSION: Oxytocin didn't have significant effects on hyperphagia or weight. To establish the impact of oxytocin in Prader-Willi patients, additional prospective, large-sample randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to avoid controversy.

Efficacy of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the primary treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Background and Aim: Molecular-targeted agents such as lenvatinib and sorafenib have been approved to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the choice between these two agents in the primary treatment for advanced HCC is still under debate with conflicting results. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with HCC. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant articles from inception until February 10, 2023. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: A total of 13 studies with 3705 patients (1635 on lenvatinib and 2070 on sorafenib) were included in our analysis. The mean age of the patients in both groups was comparable (66.81 vs 65.9 years). Pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that, compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib was associated with significantly better OS in patients treated with these drugs (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97, P = 0.02). Pooled analysis also showed that PFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78, P < 0.00001) and time to progression (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79; P = 0.004) were significantly better in the lenvatinib group compared to the sorafenib group. It also showed that the lenvatinib group had significantly better ORR (odds ratio [OR] 5.43, 95% CI: 3.71-7.97; P < 0.00001) and DCR (OR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.75-3.16; P < 00001) than the sorafenib group. Conclusion: Our study shows that lenvatinib is superior to sorafenib regarding OS and PFS in patients with advanced HCC.