RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) caused by Staphylococcus aureus is associated with high risk of treatment failure and increased morbidity. The role of rifampin-based therapy for the treatment of this condition is controversial. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the efficacy and safety of rifampin-based therapy for the treatment of S. aureus NVO. METHODS: We searched Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to May 2023, focusing on adults with NVO treated with or without rifampin-containing regimens. A random-effects model meta-analysis estimated relative risks and risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 11 comparative cohort studies), comprising 244 patients with S. aureus NVO who received rifampin and 435 who did not, were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that rifampin-based regimens were associated with lower risk of clinical failure (risk difference, -14%; 95% CI, -19% to -8%; P < .001; I2 = 0%; relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, .37-.92, P = .02, I2 = 21%). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. All studies had a high or uncertain risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was rated as very low. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive rifampin therapy might be associated with lower risk of S. aureus NVO treatment failure; however, the low certainty of evidence precludes drawing definitive conclusions that would alter clinical practice. A randomized trial is necessary to corroborate these findings.
Assuntos
Osteomielite , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Protocolos Clínicos , Osteomielite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteomielite/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Native joint septic arthritis (NJSA) is definitively diagnosed by a positive Gram stain or culture, along with supportive clinical findings. Preoperative antibiotics are known to alter synovial fluid cell count, Gram stain, and culture results and are typically postponed until after arthrocentesis to optimize diagnostic accuracy. However, data on the impact of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield for NJSA diagnosis are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult cases of NJSA who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic facilities from 2012 to 2021 to analyze the effect of preoperative antibiotics on operative culture yield through a paired analysis of preoperative culture (POC) and operative culture (OC) results using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients with NJSA affecting 321 joints were included. Among those receiving preoperative antibiotics, yield significantly decreased from 68.0% at POC to 57.1% at OC (P < .001). In contrast, for patients without preoperative antibiotics there was a non-significant increase in yield from 60.9% at POC to 67.4% at OC (P = .244). In a logistic regression model for paired data, preoperative antibiotic exposure was more likely to decrease OC yield compared to non-exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-3.64; P = .006). Within the preoperative antibiotic group, additional antibiotic doses and earlier antibiotic initiation were associated with lower OC yield. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NJSA, preoperative antibiotic exposure resulted in a significant decrease in microbiologic yield of operative cultures as compared to patients in whom antibiotic therapy was held prior to obtaining operative cultures.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Artrite Infecciosa , Humanos , Artrite Infecciosa/microbiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Líquido Sinovial/microbiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Adulto , Artrocentese , AntibioticoprofilaxiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic methods for native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) often yield inconclusive results. Image-guided spine biopsies for culture are specific but diagnose NVO in only 50% of cases. Pre-exposure to antimicrobials further reduces diagnostic yield. Our study assesses the value of neutrophil percentage in disc space fluid and vertebral body (DS/VB) samples for diagnosing NVO. METHODS: Adults referred for spine biopsy at Mayo Clinic from August 2022 to September 2023 were consented and enrolled at the time of biopsy. Following routine specimen collection, the biopsy needle was rinsed in saline into an EDTA tube for cell analysis. NVO diagnosis required organism identification in spine tissue or blood and/or positive histopathology, and consistent symptoms and imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were prospectively enrolled, comprising 14 with NVO and 54 with alternative diagnoses. The median biopsy sample polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage for NVO patients was 80.5% (IQR 72.5-85.2), compared to 64.5% (IQR 54.0-69.0) for those without NVO (p < 0.001). Nine (64.3%) NVO patients received antibiotics within 10 days prior to spine biopsy. As a continuous measure, PMN differential showed a moderately strong ability in classifying NVO status with an area under ROC curve of 0.795; an optimal point on the curve of 71.5% corresponded to a sensitivity of 78.6%, specificity of 79.6%, negative predictive value of 93.5% and positive predictive value of 50.0%. CONCLUSION: PMN differential in DS/VB biopsies may serve as an effective diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with NVO particularly in ambiguous cases with an initially negative spine biopsy. Future efforts will aim to implement these findings within routine clinical practice.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gram-negative bacillary bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) is a frequent clinical challenge among immunocompromised hosts and is associated with a high mortality. The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for GN-BSI in this population, particularly in the setting of neutropenia, is poorly defined. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study between the period of July 2018 and April 2022 to investigate the utility of FUBCs and delineate risk factors for positive cultures among neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors associated with positive FUBCs. RESULTS: Of 206 patients, 98% had FUBCs performed, and 9% were positive. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug-resistant GN infection (OR 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-8.72) and vascular catheter source (OR 4.82; CI 1.76-13.17). Among patients lacking these risk factors, the prevalence of positive FUBCs was low (2.8%) and the negative predictive value was 92%. Those with positive and negative FUBCs had similar rates of all-cause mortality (16.7% vs. 16.6%; p = .942) and microbiologic relapse (11.1% vs. 6.0%; p = .401) within 90-days of treatment completion. However, positive FUBCs were associated with prolonged hospitalization and longer duration of antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSION: Positive FUBCs were infrequent in neutropenic patients with GN-BSI, and their occurrence did not significantly impact mortality or microbiologic relapse. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug resistant Gram-negative infection and vascular catheter source. Prospective studies will be necessary to elucidate the benefits and risks of FUBCs when managing GN-BSI in patients with underlying immune compromise.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neutropenia , Sepse , Humanos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Seguimentos , Hemocultura , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neutropenia/complicações , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , RecidivaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Mayer's theory of multimedia learning proposes that personalisation and embodiment (P/E) can improve outcomes in e-Learning. The authors hypothesised that an e-Learning module enhanced by P/E principles would lead to higher knowledge, perceived P/E and motivation among health care professionals, compared with an unenhanced module. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomised trial comparing two versions of a 30-minute multimedia e-Learning module addressing the antibiotic management of pneumonia. The unenhanced format used slides with voiceover (human voice but no visible speaker), formal language and no specific P/E strategies. The enhanced format additionally implemented P/E strategies including conversational style, polite language, visible author, social congruence, human-like presence and professional presence by subtly changing the script and substituting several short videos of subject matter experts. Participants included pharmacists, physicians and advanced practice providers from three academic and several community hospitals. Outcomes included knowledge, perceived P/E (assessed by the Congruence Personalisation Questionnaire, CPQ), motivation (assessed via the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey [IMMS] and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire [MSLQ]) and course satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 406 participants including 225 pharmacists, 109 physicians and 72 advanced practice providers. Post-module knowledge was slightly higher for the enhanced versus the unenhanced format, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (adjusted mean difference, 0.04 of 10 possible, [95% CI -0.26, 0.34], p = 0.78; Cohen d 0.02). Participant perceptions of P/E (measured via CPQ) were significantly greater for the enhanced format (difference 0.46 of 5 possible [0.35, 0.56], p < 0.001; Cohen d 0.85), as were motivational features of the e-Learning course (measured via IMMS) (difference 0.14 of 5 possible [0.02, 0.26], p = 0.02; Cohen d 0.24). Participants' overall motivational orientation (measured via MSLQ) and course satisfaction were not significantly different between the two formats (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of P/E principles to an e-Learning module led to greater perceived P/E and motivational features but did not influence knowledge.
Assuntos
Instrução por Computador , Médicos , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , MotivaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may occur in the setting of an uninfected ipsilateral prosthetic joint. However, the risk to that uninfected ipsilateral joint is unknown. We analyzed the survivorship free from PJI in at risk THAs and TKAs following treatment of an ipsilateral knee or hip PJI, respectively. METHODS: Using our institutional total joint registry, we identified 205 patients who underwent treatment for PJI (123 THAs and 83 TKAs) with an at-risk ipsilateral in situ knee or hip, respectively, between 2000 and 2019. In total, 54% of index PJIs were chronic and 46% were acute. The mean age was 70 years, 47% were female, and the mean body mass index was 32. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. Mean follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship free of PJI in an at-risk THA after an ipsilateral TKA was treated for PJI was 97%. The 5-year survivorship free of PJI in an at-risk TKA when the ipsilateral THA was treated for PJI was 99%. Three PJIs occurred (2 THAs and 1 TKA), all over 1 year from the index ipsilateral PJI treatment. One hip PJI was an acute hematogenous infection that resulted from pneumonia. The other 2 new PJIs were caused by the same organism as the index PJI and were due to a failure of source control at the index joint. CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosed with PJI in a single joint, the risk of developing PJI in an ipsilateral prosthetic joint within 5 years was low (1 to 3% risk). In the rare event of an ipsilateral infection, all occurred greater than one year from the index PJI and 2 of 3 were with the same organism when source infection control failed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Feminino , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Days of therapy (DOT) currently serve as the standard antimicrobial utilization metric. However, by assigning the same weight to each agent rather than accounting for differences in spectrum of activity, DOT ignore key differences between agents that are fundamental to infectious diseases and critical to antimicrobial stewardship. Spectrum scoring assigns numeric values to individual antibiotic agents to quantify their spectrum of activity, allowing for the normalization of antibiotic utilization data. When used in conjunction with traditional metrics, spectrum scores may offer further clarity to antibiotic utilization; however, issues related to development, application, and standardization of spectrum scores remain. Despite these challenges, the potential applications of spectrum scores are vast. Here, we summarize existing data and explore the future of spectrum scoring, including application to both data analysis and routine patient care, use in inpatient and outpatient settings, integration within the electronic medical record, and opportunities for future research.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Over the last several decades, periprosthetic joint infection has been increasing in incidence and is occurring in more complex patients. While there have been advances in both surgical and medical treatment strategies, there remain important gaps in our understanding. Here, we share our current approaches to the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection, focusing on frequent clinical challenges and collaborative interdisciplinary care.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Incidência , Reoperação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Over the last several decades, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been increasing in incidence and is occurring in more complex patients. While there have been advances in both surgical and medical treatment strategies, there remain important gaps in our understanding. Here, we share our current approaches to the diagnosis and management of PJI, focusing on frequent clinical challenges and collaborative interdisciplinary care. The more detailed review including diagnosis, surgical considerations, and a detailed antimicrobial discussion is presented in the online version.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Beta-hemolytic streptococci are common causes of bloodstream infection (BSI). There is emerging data regarding oral antibiotics for BSI but limited for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI. We conducted a retrospective study of adults with beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI from a primary skin/soft tissue source from 2015 to 2020. Patients transitioned to oral antibiotics within 7 days of treatment initiation were compared to those who continued intravenous therapy, after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 30-day treatment failure (composite of mortality, infection relapse, and hospital readmission). A prespecified 10% noninferiority margin was used for the primary outcome. We identified 66 matched pairs of patients treated with oral and intravenous antibiotics as definitive therapy. Based on an absolute difference in 30-day treatment failure of 13.6% (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 24.8%), the noninferiority of oral therapy was not confirmed (P = 0.741); on the contrary, the superiority of intravenous antibiotics is suggested by this difference. Acute kidney injury occurred in two patients who received intravenous treatment and zero who received oral therapy. No patients experienced deep vein thrombosis or other vascular complications related to treatment. In patients treated for beta-hemolytic streptococcal BSI, those who transitioned to oral antibiotics by day 7 showed higher rates of 30-day treatment failure than propensity-matched patients. This difference may have been driven by underdosing of oral therapy. Further investigation into optimal antibiotic choice, route, and dosing for definitive therapy of BSI is needed.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus , Antibacterianos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
In a COVID-19 sero-surveillance cohort study with predominantly healthy and vaccinated individuals, the objectives were (i) to investigate longitudinally the factors associated with the quantitative dynamics of antispike (anti-S1) IgG antibody levels, (ii) to evaluate whether the levels were associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection, and (iii) to assess whether the association was different in the pre-Omicron compared with the Omicron period. The QuantiVac Euroimmun ELISA test was used to quantify anti-S1 IgG levels. The entire study period (16 months), the 11-month pre-Omicron period and the cross-sectional analysis before the Omicron surge included 3219, 2310, and 895 reactive serum samples from 949, 919, and 895 individuals, respectively. Mixed-effect linear, mixed-effect time-to-event, and logistic regression models were used to achieve the objectives. Age and time since infection or vaccination were the only factors associated with a decline of anti-S1 IgG levels. Higher antibody levels were significantly associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection (0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.97), and the association was higher during the time period when Omicron was predominantly circulating compared with the ones when Alpha and Delta variants were predominant (adjusted hazard ratio for interaction 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.84). In a prediction model, it was estimated that >8000 BAU/mL anti-S1 IgG was required to reduce the risk of infection with Omicron variants by approximately 20%-30% for 90 days. Though, such high levels were only found in 1.9% of the samples before the Omicron surge, and they were not durable for 3 months. Anti-S1 IgG antibody levels are statistically associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the prediction impact of the antibody level findings on infection protection is limited.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunoglobulina G , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Polícia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the management of Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI), short antimicrobial courses have been increasingly demonstrated to be non-inferior to prolonged therapy, with lower risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. However, immunocompromised hosts were excluded from these studies. We investigated outcomes of short (≤10 days), intermediate (11-14 days), and prolonged (≥15 days) antimicrobial durations for GN-BSI in neutropenic patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and microbiologic relapse within 90 days after therapy completion. The secondary outcome was a composite of 90-day CDI and development of MDR-GN bacteria. Cox regression analysis with propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to compare outcomes between the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients were classified into short (n = 67), intermediate (n = 81), or prolonged (n = 58) duration. Neutropenia was predominantly secondary to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (48%) or hematologic malignancy (35%). The primary sources of infection included intra-abdominal (51%), vascular catheter (27%), and urinary (8%). Most patients received definitive therapy with cefepime or carbapenem. No significant difference in the primary composite endpoint was observed for intermediate versus short (PS-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39-2.03) or prolonged versus short therapy (PS-aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.52-2.74). There was no significant difference in the secondary composite endpoint of CDI or MDR-GN emergence. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that short antimicrobial courses had comparable 90-day outcomes as intermediate and prolonged regimens for GN-BSI among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Bacteriemia , Infecções por Clostridium , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neutropenia , Sepse , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neutropenia/complicações , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has suggested a benefit to extended postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics after two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. We sought to determine reinfection rates with and without a short course of oral antibiotics after two-stage exchange procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip or knee. Patients were excluded if they failed a prior two-stage exchange, had positive cultures at reimplantation, prolonged intravenous antibiotics postoperatively, and/or life-long suppression. This resulted in 444 reimplantations (210 hips and 234 knees). Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the duration of oral antibiotics after reimplantation: no antibiotics (102), ≤2 weeks (266), or >2 weeks (76). The primary endpoint was reinfection within 1 year of reimplantation. RESULTS: Within 1 year of reimplantation, there were 34 reinfections. In the no-antibiotic, ≤ 2-week, and >2-week cohorts the reinfection rates were 14.1, 7.0, and 6.4%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed a reduced reinfection rate in the ≤2-week cohort relative to no antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, P = .01). While the smaller cohort with >2 weeks of antibiotics did not significantly reduce the reinfection rate (HR: 0.41, P = .12), when combined with the ≤2-week cohort, use of oral antibiotics had an overall reduction of the reinfection rate (HR: 0.39, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that a short course of oral antibiotics after reimplantation decreases the 1-year reinfection rate. Future randomized studies should seek to examine the efficacy of different durations of oral antibiotics to reduce reinfection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Reinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Reoperação/métodosRESUMO
In clinical scenario surveys, inpatient providers were more likely to report continuing inappropriate (odds ratio, 2.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.03]; P<.001) or broad-spectrum (1.8 [1.27-2.56]; P=.001) antibiotic therapy when initiated by emergency department providers, than to change to appropriate or narrow-spectrum therapy, respectively. Antibiotic inertia could represent a significant antibiotic stewardship target.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
We followed 106â 349 primary care patients for 22â 385 3099 person-days across 21 calendar months and documented 69 breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations: 65/102,613 (0.06%) among those fully vaccinated, 3/11â 047 (0.03%) among those previously infected, and 1/7,313 (0.01%) among those with both statuses. These data give providers real-world context regarding breakthrough COVID-19 hospitalization risk.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , VacinaçãoRESUMO
We report the utility of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) in a cohort of US healthcare personnel with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who met symptom criteria to return to work at day 5 or later of isolation. In total, 11.9% of initial RAgT were negative. RAgT can be helpful to guide return to work decisions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Atenção à Saúde , Seguimentos , Pessoal de Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several vaccines are now available under emergency use authorization in the United States and have demonstrated efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19. Vaccine impact on asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive, asymptomatic adult patients (nâ =â 39 156) within a large US healthcare system who underwent 48 333 preprocedural SARS-CoV-2 molecular screening tests between 17 December 2020 and 8 February 2021. The primary exposure of interest was vaccination with ≥1 dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of a positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular test among those asymptomatic persons who had received ≥1 dose of vaccine compared with persons who had not received vaccine during the same time period. RR was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, patient residence relative to the hospital (local vs nonlocal), healthcare system regions, and repeated screenings among patients using mixed-effects log-binomial regression. RESULTS: Positive molecular tests in asymptomatic individuals were reported in 42 (1.4%) of 3006 tests and 1436 (3.2%) of 45 327 tests performed on vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, respectively (RR, .44; 95% CI, .33-.60; Pâ <â .0001). Compared with unvaccinated patients, risk of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was lower among those >10 days after the first dose (RR, .21; 95% CI, .12-.37; Pâ <â .0001) and >0 days after the second dose (RR, .20; 95% CI, .09-.44; Pâ <â .0001) in the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination with an mRNA-based vaccine showed a significant association with reduced risk of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection as measured during preprocedural molecular screening. Results of this study demonstrate the impact of the vaccines on reduction in asymptomatic infections supplementing the randomized trial results on symptomatic patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Accurate diagnosis of orthopedic infection is crucial in guiding both antimicrobial therapy and surgical management in order to optimize patient outcomes. A variety of microbiological and nonmicrobiological methods are used to establish the presence of a musculoskeletal infection. In this minireview, we examine traditional culture-based and newer molecular methodologies for pathogen detection, as well as systemic and localized assays to assess host response to maximize diagnostic yield.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologiaRESUMO
In a large cohort of United States healthcare personnel without prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, 94 382 doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine were administered to 49 220 individuals. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness following 2 doses of each of the 2 available brands of mRNA vaccine exceeded 96%.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is a risk factor for development of infections; however, the direct effect of neutropenia on development of bloodstream infection (BSI) is not known. D-index, which is area between the neutrophil time curve and a neutrophil count of 0.5 × 109 /L, incorporates the combined effect of severity and duration of neutropenia. We aimed to evaluate whether D-index can be used as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome measure was the development of BSI within 30 days of transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 714 patients were included in the study of whom 101 developed BSI. Patients with BSI had a significantly higher median D-index value compared with patients who did not have BSI (4990 vs. 3570, P < .001). As a marker, the performance of the D-index was similar to that of the duration of profound neutropenia (P = .18) and significantly better than the total duration of neutropenia (P = .001). CONCLUSION: The D-index performed better than the total duration of neutropenia as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There was no difference between D-index and, a more easily calculable indicator, duration of profound neutropenia.