Operative treatment of acromial and scapular spine fracture nonunions complicating reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the acromion and spine can have a major impact on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with respect to pain, motion, and function. Reports on internal fixation for these fractures are isolated to small series or case reports with variable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acromion or spine fractures encountered before or after RSA and describes our evolution of fixation techniques. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2023, 22 fractures or nonunions of the acromion or spine of the scapula underwent ORIF at a single institution and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. In 16 shoulders, fractures occurred after RSA, whereas 5 shoulders underwent ORIF prior to RSA. One shoulder had undergone prior failed ORIF elsewhere and revision ORIF was performed at our institution. There were 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of 67 (SD = 15.1) years. Fixation strategies included single (n = 11) and double plate fixation (n = 11). Kruskal-Wallis one-way analyses of variance were used to analyze continuous variables and Chi-square tests employed for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 5 fractures treated with ORIF pre-RSA, 1 shoulder suffered an additional fracture medial to the hardware and 1 required additional bone grafting for incomplete union at the time of RSA. These 5 shoulders all underwent RSA uneventfully, but 1 fracture experienced late displacement of the scapular spine nonunion, leading to plate removal. Of the 16 post-RSA ORIF shoulders, radiographic union was confirmed in 14 and substantial residual inferior angulation identified in 3. New fractures occurred after ORIF in 5 shoulders. For patients who underwent ORIF after RSA, pain scores improved from a mean of 8 to 1.9 points, with more modest elevation gains (58.2°-91.3° pre and postoperatively, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of acromion and scapular spine fractures or nonunions in the setting of RSA have the potential to lead to union. When these fractures and nonunions are encountered prior to RSA, ORIF allows for uneventful RSA implantation, but secondary displacement may occur. ORIF seems to lead to improvements in pain, but more modest improvements in motion and function. Our fixation strategy has evolved to (1) dual plating, (2) spanning the whole length of the spine with 1 of the plates, (3) use of hook features under the acromion or os trigonum if possible, and (4) liberal use of bone graft.

Surgical treatment and outcomes of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations of the elbow are complex injuries that can be difficult to classify and treat. Trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries, in which the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the metaphysis, present substantial challenges to achieve anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2019, 32 consecutive trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction and internal fixation at our institution. Four elbows were lost to follow-up within the first 6 months after surgery and were excluded. Among the 28 elbows remaining, there were 13 females and 15 males with a mean age of 56 (range 28-78) years at the time of injury. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up times were 37 months and 29 months, respectively. Radiographs were reviewed to determine rates of union, Hastings and Graham heterotopic ossification (HO) grade, and Broberg and Morrey arthritis grade. RESULTS: Union occurred in 25 elbows. Union could not be determined for 1 elbow at most recent follow-up and the remaining 2 elbows developed nonunion of the coronoid. Complications occurred in 10 elbows (36%): deep infection (4), ulnar neuropathy (2), elbow contracture (2), and nonunion (2). There were reoperations in 11 elbows (39%): irrigation and débridement with hardware removal (4), hardware removal (2), ulnar nerve transposition (2), contracture release with HO removal (2), and revision with iliac crest autograft (1). At most recent follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 106° (range 10°-150°), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 137° (range 0°-170°). The mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range 0-39) points with a mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation-Elbow score of 81 (range 55-100) points. At final radiographic follow-up, 16 elbows (57%) had HO (8 class I and 8 class II), and 20 elbows (71%) had arthritis (8 grade 1, 6 grade 2, and 6 grade 3). DISCUSSION: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations are severe injuries associated with high rates of reoperation, HO, and post-traumatic arthritis. However, the majority of elbows achieve union, a functional range of motion, and reasonable patient reported outcome measures. Over the study period, surgeons were more likely to utilize multiple deep approaches and separate fixation of the coronoid (either with lag screws or anteromedial plates) to ensure anatomic reduction.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures.

BACKGROUND: There have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively. RESULTS: Subsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in the elderly: revision internal fixation or hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare reoperation rate and clinical outcomes between revision open reduction and internal fixation and hip arthroplasty following failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients > 50 years old treated for failed fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty from 2003 to 2023. Primary outcomes included rate of fracture union and reoperations after initial salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included complications (infection, dislocation, bursitis, implant prominence, implant failure, nonunion), pain, and gait-aid requirements by final follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified: 34 treated with revision ORIF and 10 with hip arthroplasty. The arthroplasty cohort was older (75.4 vs. 66.0 years, p = 0.016) but did not differ from the ORIF cohort in sex, type of initial fixation, or reason for fixation failure. Patients treated with revision ORIF and patients treated with arthroplasty had similar rates of fracture union (85.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.772) and reoperation (35.3% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.710). There was no significant difference in rate of additional complications not requiring reoperation (0.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.071). The arthroplasty cohort achieved full weightbearing in significantly shorter time than the revision ORIF cohort (3.8 vs. 6.8 weeks, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Both revision ORIF and hip arthroplasty are acceptable options for salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in patients greater than 50 years old, but patients should be counseled that although the rate of fracture union is high whether revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty is selected, the rate of reoperation can exceed 1-in-4 patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  : Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications after rotator cuff surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used for postoperative pain management. However, animal studies have demonstrated negative effects of NSAIDs on bone and tendon healing after commonly performed procedures such as rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of postoperative NSAID use on opioid use, pain control, and shoulder outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of postoperative NSAID use was performed in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery at a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive ibuprofen or placebo for 2 weeks postoperatively, in addition to opioid medication. They were instructed to keep a daily pain diary for the first week after surgery, which was returned at their first postoperative visit for analysis. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, shoulder range of motion, and 12-item Short Form Survey, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were collected. Assessment of rotator cuff healing was performed using ultrasound at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients in the placebo group and 51 patients in the ibuprofen group were included for analysis. There were no differences in age, race, sex, history of preoperative NSAID or opioid use, or operative findings between groups. The amount of mean total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) used in the first postoperative week was lower in the ibuprofen group than in the placebo group (168 MMEs vs. 211 MMEs, P = .04). Early VAS scores on postoperative days 3, 4, 5, and 6 were lower in the ibuprofen group, but there was no difference in mean VAS scores between groups by 6 weeks after surgery. At 6 months, mean forward flexion and the mean ASES score were higher in the ibuprofen group than in the placebo group: 162° vs. 153° (P = .03) and 86 vs. 78 (P = .02), respectively. There were no differences in shoulder motion or 12-item Short Form Survey, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, or ASES scores at 1 year. At 1 year after surgery, 7 patients in the ibuprofen group had evidence of tendon retear diagnosed on ultrasound (5 partial and 2 full thickness) compared with 13 patients in the placebo group (5 partial and 8 full thickness), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .20). CONCLUSION: Postoperative ibuprofen use reduces opioid requirements and decreases patient pain levels in the first week after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In addition, ibuprofen use after rotator cuff repair does not lead to an increased risk of tendon retear.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with excellent outcomes and low revision rates in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The relative indications of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continue to evolve. Some surgeons favor RSA over TSA for elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff due to fear of a postoperative (secondary) rotator cuff tear in this age group. However, RSA is associated with unique complications and a worse functional arc of motion compared with TSA. Therefore, it is important to understand the clinical outcomes and rates of revision surgery and secondary rotator cuff tears in elderly patients undergoing TSA. METHODS: Between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, 377 consecutive TSAs were performed for primary GHOA in 340 patients 70 years of age or older. The mean age at surgery was 76.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.9). Clinical evaluation included pain, motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Radiographs were reviewed for preoperative morphology and postoperative complications. All complications and reoperations were recorded. The average clinical follow-up time was 3.3 years (SD, 2.0). Statistical analyses were performed, and Kaplan-Meier implant survival estimates were calculated. For all analyses, a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean pain visual analog scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at the final follow-up were 1.6 (SD, 2.2) and 78.0 (SD, 17.8), respectively. Forward elevation and external rotation increased from 96° (SD, 30°) and 26° (SD, 20°) preoperatively to 160° (SD, 32°) and 64° (SD, 26°) postoperatively (P < .001 for each). The percentage of patients who had internal rotation to L5 or greater increased from 24.8% preoperatively to 71.8% postoperatively (P < .001). Revision surgery was performed in 3 shoulders (0.8%), and the 5-year implant survival estimate was 98.9% (95% confidence interval: 97.3%-100%). There were 3 medical (0.8%), 10 minor surgical (2.7%), and 5 major surgical (1.3%) complications. No shoulder had radiographic evidence of humeral component loosening, whereas 7 (2%) had evidence of some degree of glenoid component loosening. In total, there were 5 secondary rotator cuff tears (1.3%), of which 2 (0.5%) required revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff have excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes after anatomic TSA, with high implant survival rates and a low incidence of secondary rotator cuff tears in the first 5 postoperative years. Age greater than 70 by itself should not be considered an indication for RSA over TSA.

Hip Fractures and the Bundle: A Cost Analysis of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture vs Degenerative Joint Disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether episode Target Prices in the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative sufficiently match the complexities and expenses expected for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) as compared to hip degenerative joint disease (DJD). METHODS: Claims data under BPCI Model 2 were collected for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty at a single institution over a 2-year period. Payments from the index hospitalization to 90 days postoperatively were aggregated by Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (469 or 470), indication (DJD vs FNF), and categorized as index procedure, postacute services, and related hospital readmissions. Actual episode costs and Target Prices were compared in both the FNF and DJD cohorts undergoing hip arthroplasty to gauge the cost discrepancy in each group. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were analyzed (31 with FNFs, 152 with DJD). In total, the FNF cohort incurred a $415,950 loss under the current episode Target Prices, whereas the DJD cohort incurred a $172,448 gain. Episode Target Prices were significantly higher than actual episode prices for the DJD cohort ($32,573 vs $24,776, P < .001). However, Target Prices were significantly lower than actual episode prices for the FNF cohort ($32,672 vs $49,755, P = .021). CONCLUSION: Episode Target Prices in the current BPCI model fall dramatically short of the actual expenses incurred by FNF patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Better risk-adjusting Target Prices for this fragile population should be considered to avoid disincentives and delays in care.

Management of greater tuberosity fracture dislocations of the shoulder.

Background: Despite extensive literature dedicated to determining the optimal treatment of isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fractures, there have been few studies to guide the management of GT fracture dislocations. The purpose of this review was to highlight the relevant literature pertaining to all aspects of GT fracture dislocation evaluation and treatment. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed. Results: During glenohumeral reduction, an iatrogenic humeral neck fracture may occur due to the presence of an occult neck fracture or forceful reduction attempts with inadequate muscle relaxation. Minimally displaced GT fragments after shoulder reduction can be successfully treated nonoperatively, but close follow-up is needed to monitor for secondary displacement of the fracture. Surgery is indicated for fractures with >5 mm displacement to minimize the risk of subacromial impingement and altered rotator cuff biomechanics. Multiple surgical techniques have been described and include both open and arthroscopic approaches. Strategies for repair include the use of transosseous sutures, suture anchors, tension bands, screws, and plates. Good-to-excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes can be achieved with appropriate treatment. Conclusions: GT fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus represent a separate entity from their isolated fracture counterparts in their evaluation and treatment. The decision to employ a certain strategy should depend on fracture morphology and comminution, bone quality, and displacement.

Omega Plate Fixation of Comminuted Olecranon Fractures: Technique and Case Series.

Fixation of olecranon fractures, especially those with minimal proximal bone and those that present with significant comminution, can be technically challenging. Current open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) methods, such as tension band wire (TBW) constructs, plate fixation (PF), and intramedullary screws (IMSF), have demonstrated high rates of reoperation and symptomatic implants. We present the omega plate technique, which utilizes a mini-fragment plate passed under the triceps tendon insertion, allowing maximal implant surface area contact with small, proximal olecranon fracture fragments. The mini-fragment plate is not placed on the dorsal subcutaneous border of the ulna, which allows it to capture medial and lateral fragments of cortical comminution and may contribute to less soft tissue irritation.

Anatomic Osteochondral Allograft Reconstruction for Concomitant Large Hill-Sachs and Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions.

Glenohumeral instability causing bipolar bone loss is increasingly being recognized and treated to minimize recurrence. Large Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions of the humerus must be addressed at the time of surgery to prevent recurrent dislocations and restore the native anatomic track. For patients with epilepsy, locked dislocations may create defects that must be addressed with bony procedures, including osteochondral allograft reconstruction as soft-tissue remplissage may not adequately addresses the magnitude of the bone loss. Osteochondral allografts have been successfully used to address bony defects ranging from 20% to 30% of humeral bone loss whereas shoulder arthroplasty is indicated for larger defects where the native anatomy can no longer be restored. In this Technical Note, we present a technique to address concomitant large Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions.