The Impact of Social Comparison via Social Media on Maternal Mental Health, within the Context of the Intensive Mothering Ideology: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Social media platforms communicate narratives of individuals, specifically the narrative of motherhood. The ascendant mothering narrative in Western society is Intensive Mothering Ideology (IMI). These ideals, norms, and practices set unattainable standards. Highly romanticized versions of motherhood portrayed on social media tend to stimulate social comparisons among women potentially impacting their well-being. This scoping review seeks to examine the literature that identifies the impact of social comparison via social media on maternal mental health, within the context of IMI. The methodology by Arksey and O'Malley guided the approach to creating this scoping review. Systematic searches of articles published within the previous 10 years were conducted in Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, and PsycINFO. Searches aimed to capture concepts regarding social media as a medium for social comparison, and transmission of intensive mothering ideologies ultimately impacting maternal mental health. Articles were screened at the title and abstract level first, followed by application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nine articles were selected for inclusion in this scoping review. The studies were published in seven peer-reviewed journals, from four different countries with most originating from the United States. Results revealed that making social comparisons after exposure to intensive mothering ideas negatively impacted maternal well-being. Within the context of the Social Comparison Theory (SCT), maternal characteristics like self-esteem and maternal comparison orientation (MCO) seem to mediate the impact that social media has on maternal mental health. Social media communicates highly idealized motherhood mores, and critical analyses should focus on how mothers use social media.

Metformin in Conjunction With Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Long-term Results of a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly detected in early stages and there is interest in improving outcomes with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). As metformin affects NSCLC signaling pathways, it might alter the metabolism of NSCLC treated with SBRT. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of a phase II clinical trial evaluating metformin in conjunction with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial evaluated patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition Stage I-II, cT1-T2N0M0 NSCLC who were randomized 6:1 to receive metformin versus placebo in conjunction with SBRT. The outcomes analyzed included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 toxicities. RESULTS: There were 14 patients randomized to the metformin arm and one to the placebo. Median follow-up was four years. In the metformin group, the median PFS was 4.65 years [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.31-5.93] and median survival was 4.97 years (95%CI=3.05-4.61). Five year PFS was 27.8% (95%CI=5.3-57.3%) and OS was 46.0% (95%CI=16.0-71.9%). The one patient randomized to placebo was alive and without progression at five years. There were no LFs in the primary SBRT treatment volumes and no CTCAE version 4 Grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of SBRT and metformin for early-stage NSCLC were similar to historic controls. These findings along with the results of the NRG-LU001 and OCOG randomized trials do not support the therapeutic use of metformin for NSCLC.

Development and clinical implementation of a digital workflow utilizing 3D-printed oral stents for patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the development of 3D-printed stents using our digital workflow and their effects on patients enrolled in the lead-in phase of a multi-center, randomized Phase-II trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital dental models were created for patients using intraoral scanning. Digital processes were implemented to develop the mouth-opening, tongue-depressing, and tongue-lateralizing stents using stereolithography. Time spent and material 3D-printing costs were measured. Physicians assessed mucositis using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) and collected MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) reports and adverse events (AEs) from patients at various time points (TPs). OMAS and MDASI results were evaluated using paired t-test analysis. RESULTS: 18 patients enrolled into the lead-in phase across 6 independent clinical sites in the USA. 15 patients received stents (average design and fabrication time, 8 h; average material 3D-printing cost, 11 USD). 10 eligible patients with complete OMAS and MDASI reports across all TPs were assessed. OMAS increased significantly from baseline to week 3 of treatment (mean difference = 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.60; p = 0.01). MDASI increased significantly from baseline to week 3 of treatment (mean difference = 1.02; 95 % CI, 0.40-1.70; p = 0.005), and week 3 of treatment to end of treatment (mean difference = 1.90; 95 % CI, 0.90-2.92; p = 0.002). AEs (grades 1-3) were reported by patients across TPs. Mucositis and radiation dermatitis were primarily attributed to chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed stents were successfully fabricated and well tolerated by patients. As patients enroll in the randomized phase of this trial, data herein will establish a baseline for comparative analysis.