QRS-T angle: is it a specific parameter associated with sudden cardiac death in type 2 diabetes? Results from the SURDIAGENE and the Mini-Finland prospective cohorts.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 2 diabetes is associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), but the risk of dying from another cause (non-SCD) is proportionally even higher. The aim of the study was to identify easily available ECG-derived features associated with SCD, while considering the competing risk of dying from non-SCD causes. METHODS: In the SURDIAGENE (Survie, Diabete de type 2 et Genetique) French prospective cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes, 15 baseline ECG parameters were interpreted among 1362 participants (mean age 65 years; HbA1c 62±17 mmol/mol [7.8±1.5%]; 58% male). Competing risk models assessed the prognostic value of clinical and ECG parameters for SCD after adjusting for age, sex, history of myocardial infarction, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), HbA1c and eGFR. The prospective Mini-Finland cohort study was used to externally validate our findings. RESULTS: During median follow-up of 7.4 years, 494 deaths occurred including 94 SCDs. After adjustment, frontal QRS-T angle ≥90° (sub-distribution HR [sHR] 1.68 [95% CI 1.04, 2.69], p=0.032) and NT-proBNP level (sHR 1.26 [95% CI 1.06, 1.50] per 1 log, p=0.009) were significantly associated with a higher risk of SCD. Nevertheless, frontal QRS-T angle was the only marker not to be associated with causes of death other than SCD (sHR 1.08 [95% CI 0.84, 1.39], p=0.553 ). These findings were replicated in the Mini-Finland study subset of participants with diabetes (sHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.05, 4.71], p=0.04 for SCD and no association for other causes of death). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: QRS-T angle was specifically associated with SCD risk and not with other causes of death, opening an avenue for refining SCD risk stratification in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Baroreflex sensitivity assessed with the sequence method is associated with ventricular arrhythmias in patients implanted with a defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction lacks accuracy in predicting sudden cardiac death, resulting in unnecessary implantation of cardioverter defibrillators for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Baroreflex sensitivity could help to stratify patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmia. AIM: To assess the association between cardiac baroreflex sensitivity and ventricular arrhythmias in patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. METHODS: This case-control single-centre study took place between 2015 and 2016. Cases (n=10) had experienced ventricular arrhythmias treated by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the previous 3 years; controls (n=22) had no arrhythmia during the same period. Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed using the temporal sequence method (mean slope) and cross-spectral analysis (low-frequency gain and high-frequency gain). RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years; 94% of the patients were men. 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram autonomous nervous system variables, left ventricular ejection fraction and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration did not differ between cases and controls. The mean slope was lower in cases than in controls (8 vs. 15ms/mmHg [P=0.009] in the supine position; 7 vs. 12ms/mmHg [P=0.038] in the standing position). The mean slope in the supine position was still significantly different between groups after adjustment for age, left ventricular ejection fraction and NT-proBNP (P=0.03). By comparison, low-frequency gain and high-frequency gain did not differ between groups in either the supine or the standing position. CONCLUSION: Patients with ventricular arrhythmias had a lower mean slope compared with those who were free of arrhythmia. A prospective study is needed to confirm this association.