A systematic review of the use of intranasal steroids in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if intranasal steroids (INS) are useful in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with polyps. DATA SOURCES: Studies for inclusion were searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and references of included studies. REVIEW METHODS: Initial screening of article titles and abstracts obtained from the literature search was performed independently by two reviewers (SAJ and RT) based on the research protocol criteria. These articles then underwent a second-stage review. Each article was read in detail and discussed by the two reviewers before inclusion in the study. RESULTS: The review yielded 13 studies regarding the treatment of sinonasal polyps with intranasal steroids. Six of these could be included in the meta-analysis. The outcome measure used for meta-analysis was change in polyp size from baseline compared between the treatment and control groups. Results from both conservative and optimistic selection of treatment effect are positive, providing significant improvement in polyp size in the treatment group as compared to controls. In the conservative estimate, the mean improvement in polyp size score between the treatment and placebo group is 0.43 with a 95% CI of [0.25, 0.61]. Of those treatment groups with the largest improvement, the mean improvement in polyp size score can go as high as 0.63 with a 95% CI of [0.43, 0.82]. CONCLUSION: Intranasal steroids are beneficial in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with sinonasal polyps. Further studies looking at the use of INS in the treatment of CRS without polyps are warranted.

Methylene blue and parathyroid adenoma localization: Three new cases of a rare cutaneous complication.

Methylene blue has been safely used for the localization of parathyroid glands during parathyroidectomy, and only a few adverse effects have been documented. Methylene blue administration as a cause of pulse-oximetry-related skin injury is extremely rare. We describe 2 such cases in patients who developed a blister on the second digit at the pulse oximetry site after an uncomplicated excision of a parathyroid adenoma. In another case, a patient became bradycardic intraoperatively; she was successfully resuscitated, but she incurred a second-degree burn at the pulse oximetry site. In all 3 cases, the burns resolved with local wound care. We publish this report to alert surgeons and anesthesiologists to the risk of skin complications with the use of high-dose intraoperative methylene blue.