Crossing the handover chasm: Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to the early detection and timely management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to identify barriers to the early detection and timely management of severe sepsis throughout the emergency department (ED), general ward (GW), intermediate care unit (IMC), and the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five multicenter focus group discussions with 29 clinicians were conducted. Discussions were based on a moderation guide were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis was performed according to the principles of the concept mapping method and the framework approach. RESULTS: The major causes of the delayed detection and treatment could be summarized in a framework of communication errors and handover difficulties throughout patients' course of treatment, which can be divided into 5 core areas: inadequate histories before hospital admission; poorly coordinated handovers between the ambulance service and the ED; delayed patient transfer between the ED and the GW as well as delays in patient transfers between the GW and the ICU by, for example, a lack of bed capacity and a shortage of staff. Generally, participants from all wards mentioned that the urgency with which septic patients needed to be treated was not communicated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the need to improve intra- and interunit handover processes in hospital care, which would ensure a holistic treatment concept, thereby improving patient care.

Hospital Incidence and Mortality Rates of Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis, the most severe manifestation of acute infection, poses a major challenge to health care systems around the world. To date, adequate data on the incidence and mortality of sepsis in Germany have been lacking. METHODS: Nationwide case-related hospital DRG statistics for the years 2007-2013 were used to determine the in-hospital incidence and mortality of sepsis. Cases were identified on the basis of the clinical and pathogen-based ICD-10 codes for sepsis. The statistical evaluation was standardized for age and sex and carried out separately for each age group. RESULTS: The number of cases of sepsis rose by an average of 5.7% per year, from 200 535 in 2007 to 279 530 in 2013, corresponding to an increase in the adjusted in-hospital incidence from 256 to 335 cases per 100 000 persons per year. The percentage of patients with severe sepsis rose from 27% to 41%. The in-hospital mortality of sepsis fell over the same period by 2.7%, to 24.3%. In 2013, 67 849 persons died of sepsis in German hospitals (or died of another disease, but also had sepsis). The incidence was highest in the youngest and oldest age groups, and the in-hospital mortality rose nearly linearly with age from age 40 onward. CONCLUSION: Sepsis and death from sepsis are markedly more common in Germany than previously assumed, and they are on the rise. Sepsis statistics should become a standard component of federal statistical reports on public health, as well as of hospital statistics. Preventive measures and evidencebased treatment should be implemented across the nation.

Barriers and supportive conditions to improve quality of care for critically ill patients: A team approach to quality improvement.

PURPOSE: Despite the fact that Quality Improvement (QI) teams are widespread tools for improving performance in medical settings, little is known about what makes teams effective and successful. The goal of this study was to identify barriers and supportive conditions for QI teams to implement an effective and successful QI project to improve quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter expert interviews with 17 team leaders were conducted in a cluster randomized trial. Interviews were based on a semistructured interview guide and were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analysis was performed according to the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: The major findings of our study can be summarized in a framework of conditions that support the implementation of changes by QI teams. This framework can be divided into 5 core categories: the availability of external support, an interdisciplinary QI team, staff characteristics such as dedicated employees who are aware and experienced, and generally supportive structural circumstances. Furthermore, the interviewees reported that changes should be disseminated through, for example, repeating key elements or addressing employees directly. CONCLUSIONS: Using a grounded theory-based qualitative approach, we identified a framework of conditions supportive of QI-related change, which can help project initiators to create environments that are supportive of change.

Hyperlactatemia is an independent predictor of mortality and denotes distinct subtypes of severe sepsis and septic shock.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines and most trials do not consider elevated lactate (Lac) serum concentrations when grading sepsis severity. We therefore assessed the association of different types of circulatory dysfunction regarding presence of hyperlactatemia and need for vasopressor support with clinical presentation and outcome of sepsis. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a prospective observational multicenter cohort study, 988 patients with severe sepsis were investigated regarding vasopressor support, Lac levels, and outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-eight-day mortality regarding shock or hyperlactatemia was as follows: hyperlactatemia more than 2.5 mmol/L and septic shock (tissue dysoxic shock): 451 patients with a mortality of 44.8%; hyperlactatemia without vasopressor need (cryptic shock): 72 patients, mortality 35.3%; no hyperlactatemia with vasopressor need (vasoplegic shock): 331 patients, mortality 27.7%; and absence of hyperlactemia or overt shock (severe sepsis): 134 patients, mortality 14.2% (P < .001). These groups showed differences in source and origin of infection. The influence of hyperlactatemia on 28-day mortality (P < .001) (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1-4.1 for Lac >4 mmol/L) was independent of vasopressor support (P < .001) (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.0 for norepinephrine >0.1 µg/kg per minute) in logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperlactatemia increases risk of death independent of vasopressor need resulting in different phenotypes within the classic categories of severe sepsis and septic shock.