Effective stewardship strategies to enhance appropriateness of refer-out test requests in a Canadian tertiary centre laboratory.

OBJECTIVES: Specialized testing conducted in reference laboratories is costly and often not optimally directed. Since 2016, our institution has worked to ensure the appropriateness of refer-out (RO) tests. We examine the impact of utilization initiatives on the patterns of requests and completed tests. DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2016, 81 RO tests were selected for a more rigorous approval process. Physicians not pre-approved for testing received a prompt to consult with laboratory subject matter experts (SMEs) for further detail. After review, SMEs provided responses, approving or rejecting requests based on clinical relevance. Stewardship activities also included: repatriating tests locally, preferring Canadian over foreign institutions, unbundling tests, distributing educational memos, and introducing staged testing. We collected data on the number of requested (NoR) and number of completed (NoC) tests in 2015, before the implementation of the new vetting procedures, and for the post-implementation phase from 2016-2022. RESULTS: For 62 targeted RO tests (including trace metals, vitamins, antibodies, and endocrine-related tests), there was a 33% reduction in NoR and a 51% reduction in NoC in 2022 compared to 2015. The total savings for the study period based on NoC was $807,736. The NoC rate for Neuronal antibody tests decreased to 48.6% in 2022, with cost savings of $17,123, and an additional $50,000 saved by changing the testing site. Insourcing apolipoprotein B and fecal calprotectin tests resulted in cost savings of $3,380 and $3,371, respectively, in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Automated messaging followed by a formal review of RO test requests is an effective utilization strategy that prevents redundant or clinically unjustified testing. This approach leads to significant economic savings and is expected to improve the efficiency of patient care.

Reflex and reflective laboratory interventions for adding value to test results; an integral part of laboratory stewardship.

Post-analytical reflexive (automated) and/or reflective (patient tailored and thought driven) interventions (PARRI), have played a subsidiary role in many diagnostic laboratories, despite mounting evidence of their clinical value. The ever-pervasive demand for greater quality healthcare while curbing costs mandates laboratory stewardship utilizing the most robust testing strategies, including PARRI, to guide patient management. Clinical and medical biochemists are well positioned to guide such additive testing strategies by performing such maneuvers as scrutiny of selected test results, determination of potential adjunctive testing and provision of result interpretation. Significant practice variation exists between laboratories however, including the scope, threshold, and choice of test add-ons and whether the process is reflexive or reflective. Compounding the issue, cost effectiveness of some of these interventions has been sparsely reported. Calls for standardization and scalability have posited artificial intelligence (AI) as the frontier of additive testing. This review article examines each of these aspects and summarizes the evidence supporting PARRI and the related challenges. Theaim isto contribute to national and international momentum towards value-based healthcare.

DMG26: A Targeted Sequencing Panel for Mutation Profiling to Address Gaps in the Prognostication of Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma presents with numerous primary genomic lesions that broadly dichotomize cases into hyperdiploidy or IgH translocated. Clinically, these large alterations are assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for risk stratification at diagnosis. Secondary focal events, including indels and single-nucleotide variants, are also reported; however, their clinical correlates are poorly described, and FISH has insufficient resolution to assess many of them. This study examined the exonic sequences of 26 genes reported to be mutated in >1% of patients with myeloma using a custom panel. These exons were sequenced to approximately 1000 times in a cohort of 76 patients from Atlantic Canada with detailed clinical correlates and in four multiple myeloma cell lines. Across the 76 patients, 255 mutations and 33 focal copy number variations were identified. High-severity mutations and mutations predicted by FATHMM-XF to be pathogenic identified patients with significantly reduced progression-free survival. These mutations were mutually exclusive from the Revised International Staging System high-risk FISH markers and were independent of all biochemical parameters of the Revised International Staging System. Applying our panel to patients classified by FISH to be standard risk successfully reclassified patients into high- and standard-risk groups. Furthermore, three patients in our cohort each had two high-risk markers; two of these patients developed plasma cell leukemia, a rare and severe clinical sequela of multiple myeloma.

Candidate recommendations for protein electrophoresis reporting from the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Monoclonal Gammopathy Working Group.

Protein electrophoresis is commonly used as an aid in the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies and is performed in many laboratories in Canada and throughout the world. However, unlike many other diagnostic tests, there is limited guidance for standardization and neither guidance nor specific recommendations for clinical reporting of serum (SPE) or urine (UPE) protein electrophoresis and immunotyping available in the literature. Therefore, a Canadian effort was undertaken to recommend standards that cover all aspects of clinical reporting with an ultimate goal towards reporting standardization. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists (CSCC) Monoclonal Gammopathy Interest Group (MGIG), which is composed of CSCC members with an interest in protein electrophoresis, has formed a Monoclonal Gammopathy Working Group (MGWG) to take initial steps towards standardization of SPE, UPE and immunotyping. Candidate standardization recommendations were developed, discussed and voted upon by the MGWG. Candidate recommendations that achieved 90% agreement are presented as consensus recommendations. Recommendations that did not achieve 90% consensus remain candidate recommendations and are presented with accompanying MGWG discussion. Eleven consensus recommendations along with candidate recommendations for nomenclature, protein fraction reporting, test utilization, interference handling and interpretive reporting options are presented.

An effective utilization management strategy by dual approach of influencing physician ordering and gate keeping.

OBJECTIVES: There is increasing recognition of the importance of appropriate laboratory test utilization. We investigate the effect of a multifaceted educational approach that includes physician feedback on individual test ordering, in conjunction with targeted restriction, on the utilization of selected laboratory tests. DESIGN AND METHODS: Scientific evidence was compiled on the usefulness and limitations of tests suspected of being over utilized in our laboratories. A variety of approaches were used to deliver education on each of the targeted tests, with greater focus on primary care physicians (PCPs). Feedback on requesting behavior of these tests was also communicated to the latter group which included an educational component. Laboratory based restriction of testing was also exercised, including the unbundling of our electrolyte panel. RESULTS: PCP requesting patterns for the selected tests were found to be markedly skewed. The interventions implemented over the study period resulted in a substantial 51% reduction in overall ordering of five of the targeted tests equating to an annual marginal cost saving of $60,124. Unbundling of the electrolyte panel resulted in marginal cost savings that equated annually to $42,500 on chloride and $48,000 on total CO2. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted educational approach combined with feedback on utilization and laboratory driven gate-keeping significantly reduced the number of laboratory tests suspected of being redundant or unjustifiably requested. Laboratory professionals are well positioned to manage demand on laboratory tests by utilizing evidence base in developing specific test ordering directives and gate-keeping rules.