Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outbreak in Peru 2019 Associated With Campylobacter jejuni Infection.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinical phenotypes and infectious triggers in the 2019 Peruvian Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) outbreak. METHODS: We prospectively collected clinical and neurophysiologic data of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru, between May and August 2019. Molecular, immunologic, and microbiological methods were used to identify causative infectious agents. Sera from 41 controls were compared with cases for antibodies to Campylobacter jejuni and gangliosides. Genomic analysis was performed on 4 C jejuni isolates. RESULTS: The 49 included patients had a median age of 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-54 years), and 28 (57%) were male. Thirty-two (65%) had symptoms of a preceding infection: 24 (49%) diarrhea and 13 (27%) upper respiratory tract infection. The median time between infectious to neurologic symptoms was 3 days (IQR 2-9 days). Eighty percent had a pure motor form of GBS, 21 (43%) had the axonal electrophysiologic subtype, and 18% the demyelinating subtype. Evidence of recent C jejuni infection was found in 28/43 (65%). No evidence of recent arbovirus infection was found. Twenty-three cases vs 11 controls (OR 3.3, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.2-9.2, p < 0.01) had IgM and/or IgA antibodies against C jejuni. Anti-GM1:phosphatidylserine and/or anti-GT1a:GM1 heteromeric complex antibodies were strongly positive in cases (92.9% sensitivity and 68.3% specificity). Genomic analysis showed that the C jejuni strains were closely related and had the Asn51 polymorphism at cstII gene. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the 2019 Peruvian GBS outbreak was associated with C jejuni infection and that the C jejuni strains linked to GBS circulate widely in different parts of the world.

Frecuencia de las señales de alarma en pacientes con cefalea, atendidos en la emergencia de un hospital de Lima / Frequency of red flags in patients with headaches treated in an emergency unit in Lima

Las cefaleas en emergencia suelen ser un reto diagnóstico para el evaluador cuando se trata de diferenciarlas entreprimaria o secundaria a un trastorno neurológico subyacente.Objetivo: Describir la frecuencia de las señales de alarma en cefaleas secundarias y primarias en pacientes que acuden a emergencia.Materiales y Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de series de casos, que acuden a la Emergencia de Medicina de Adultos del Hospital Nacional CayetanoHeredia por cefalea, en un mes. Se excluyeron a los pacientes con cefalea traumática. Se usó un formato para laobtención de datos. Se clasificó a los pacientes en cefalea primaria o secundaria y se determinó la presencia de señales de alarma. Resultados:Se registraron 32 pacientes. Veintiséis (81%) tuvieron cefalea secundaria. De éstas, 9 se debieron a causas infecciosas y 9 a trastornos vasculares intracraneales. La cantidad de señales de alarma presentes en las cefaleas secundarias vario de 3 a 8, con una moda de 5; y en las primarias de 0 a 2, con una moda de 2. El empeoramiento progresivo y el examen neurológico anormal se presentaron en 96% de los casos de cefalea secundaria. Conclusiones: Las señales de alarma, empeoramiento progresivo y examen neurológico anormal fueronlos más frecuentes. Las cefaleas secundarias fueron más comunes que las cefaleas primarias. Se hace énfasis en la utilidad de usar esta metodología en emergencia

Headaches in the emergency room are usually a diagnostic challenge for the physician when they having to differentiate between a primary and secondary headaches and an underlying neurological disorder. Objectives: Describe the frequency of presentation of “red flags” in primary and secondary headaches, in patients presenting to an emergency department. Methods: A case-series prospective study was conducted in the Emergency room of Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia. All patients presenting with headaches within a month were evaluated. Trauma related headaches were excluded. A data collection form was used to determine the presence of red flags as well as other clinical data. The quantity of red flags was assessed in both types of headaches. Results: Thirty two patients were included for study. Twenty-six (81%) had secondary headaches. Nine of them were found to be secondary to infection and other 9 to intracranial vascular disorders. The quantity of red flags present on secondary headaches ranged from 3 to 8 with a mode of 5; on primary headaches they ranged from 0 to 2 with a mode of 2. Progressive worsening of headache and abnormal neurologic exam were present in 25 cases of secondary headache Conclusions: Red flags were progressive worsening of headache and abnormal neurologic exam. Thus the clinical assessment of red flags is useful in the evaluation of patients with secondary headache in the emergency room.