Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Repeated Treatments With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Children With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

PURPOSE: OnabotulinumtoxinA is an approved treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in adults inadequately managed with anticholinergics, and more recently was approved in children on the basis of a phase 3, 48-week, single-treatment study (NCT01852045). Given the paucity of long-term pediatric data, we report on the continued safety in these patients after repeated onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, repeat-treatment extension study (NCT01852058) in patients who entered from the preceding single-treatment study. Data were integrated across both studies. All patients (5-17 years) used clean intermittent catheterization and could receive dose escalations based on response to preceding treatment (50 U, 100 U, or 200 U onabotulinumtoxinA [not to exceed 6 U/kg]). RESULTS: Overall, 95, 90, 55, and 11 patients received 1, 2, 3, and 4 treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA, respectively, and median (quartiles) duration of follow-up was 82 (65, 94) weeks. The safety profile was similar across doses and after repeat treatments. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event during cycles 1, 2, and 3 was urinary tract infection (31%, 34%, 22%). Three serious treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment (3/95; 3.2%) were reported during the study, which were all cases of urinary tract infection. Annualized urinary tract infection rates post-treatment were similar to pre-screening rates. There were no cases of autonomic dysreflexia, neutralizing antibodies, and treatment-emergent adverse events related to distant spread of toxin. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA continued to be well tolerated after repeated treatments in pediatric neurogenic detrusor overactivity patients with similar safety profiles across dose groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were primarily urological with no new safety concerns.

Intravesical Instillation of OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder in Participants with Urinary Incontinence.

PURPOSE: Intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious for the treatment of overactive bladder with urgency urinary incontinence in adults refractory to or intolerant of anticholinergics. Delivery of onabotulinumtoxinA via instillation would reduce the need for intradetrusor injections. The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravesical instillation of an onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel admixture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After review of a stage 1 safety phase by an independent committee, participants were recruited into stage 2 and randomized to either onabotulinumtoxinA 100, 300, 400, or 500 U, or placebo, all with hydrogel admixture. End points included change from baseline to week 12 in the number of urinary incontinence episodes (primary); micturition, urgency urinary, and nocturia episodes/day; volume voided per micturition; proportion of participants with a ≥50% decrease from baseline in urinary incontinence episodes/day; and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire total score. Adverse events were reported. RESULTS: Change from baseline to week 12 in number of urinary incontinence episodes was -2.72 with placebo and ranged from -0.89 to -1.85 in the onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel treatment groups. No difference from placebo was observed for any efficacy end point. The proportions of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among all groups, with asymptomatic bacteriuria the highest reported (6.7%-15.5%). There were no reports of urinary retention or elevated post-void residual volume. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical instillation of an onabotulinumtoxinA + hydrogel admixture for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder was well tolerated, but it showed no improvement over placebo.

OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children.

AIMS: This study evaluated whether one (or more) of three doses of onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and effective to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children. METHODS: This was a 48-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in children (aged 5-17 years) with NDO and urinary incontinence (UI) receiving one onabotulinumtoxinA treatment (50, 100, or 200 U; not to exceed 6 U/kg). Primary endpoint: change from baseline in daytime UI episodes. Secondary endpoints: change from baseline in urine volume at first morning catheterization, urodynamic measures, and positive response on the treatment benefit scale. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: There was a similar reduction in urinary incontinence from baseline to Week 6 for all doses (-1.3 episodes/day). Most patients reported positive responses on the treatment benefit scale (75.0%-80.5%). From baseline to Week 6, increases were observed in urine volume at first morning clean intermittent catheterization (50 U, 21.9 ml; 100 U, 34.9 ml; 200 U, 87.5 ml; p = 0.0055, 200 U vs. 50 U) and in maximum cystometric capacity (range 48.6-63.6 ml) and decreases in maximum detrusor pressure during the storage phase (50 U, -12.9; 100 U, -20.1; 200 U, -27.3 cmH2 O; p = 0.0157, 200 U vs. 50 U). The proportion of patients experiencing involuntary detrusor contractions dropped from baseline (50 U, 94.4%; 100 U, 88.1%; 200 U, 92.6%) to Week 6 (50 U, 61.8%; 100 U, 44.7%; 200 U, 46.4%). Safety was similar across doses; urinary tract infection was most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of NDO in children; 200 U showed greater efficacy in reducing bladder pressure and increasing bladder capacity.

Results of a study examining the use of onabotulinumtoxinA in pediatric patients with overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of approved treatments for pediatric patients with overactive bladder (OAB) with inadequate response to anticholinergic therapy. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100U is approved to treat OAB in adults based on data from randomized, pivotal trials. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of OAB in children aged 12-17 years who were not adequately managed with anticholinergics. STUDY DESIGN: In this multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose study (NCT02097121), pediatric patients with OAB were randomized 1:1:1 to receive onabotulinumtoxinA 25U, 50U, or 100U (≤6 U/kg). Patients could request retreatment starting at week 12. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 after treatment 1 in daily frequency of daytime urinary incontinence (UI) episodes. Safety assessments evaluated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Of 68 screened patients, 55 received ≥1 treatment. Mean age was 14 years; 85.5% of patients were female. At week 12 after treatment 1, least squares mean change from baseline in daily frequency of daytime UI episodes showed a numerically greater reduction in the 100U arm (-2.4) versus the 25U arm (-1.4; P = 0.38), with a significant within-group change from baseline in the 100U arm (P = 0.0027). Achievement of treatment response was significantly greater with onabotulinumtoxinA 100U vs 25U (Figure). Median time to request retreatment was ≥16 weeks in all groups. The most frequently reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (10.9%) and urinary tract infection (UTI; 10.9%). Urinary retention was observed in 1 patient during treatment cycle 2; there were no serious TEAEs of UTI or urinary retention. Throughout 2 additional treatment cycles continued efficacy for the 100U dose arm was observed along with a consistent safety profile. DISCUSSION: Change in daily frequency of UI episodes at week 12 in treatment cycle 1 was not significantly different between arms. However, ≥50% response rate was significantly higher with onabotulinumtoxinA 100U versus 25U. Enrollment challenges that lowered the sample size could have reduced statistical power. Also, the lack of a placebo arm and the observed benefit with the 25U comparator limited interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA injections were well tolerated in children with OAB at all doses studied. Although the primary endpoint was not met, the significantly greater treatment response rate observed with onabotulinumtoxinA 100U versus 25U suggests additional benefit of the higher dose, without additional safety concerns.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Epicardial injection of botulinum toxin may suppress POAF. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of AGN-151607 for the prevention of POAF after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of AGN-151607, 125 U and 250 U vs placebo (1:1:1), for the prevention of POAF after cardiac surgery. Randomization was stratified by age (<65, ≥65 years) and type of surgery (nonvalvular/valve surgery). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of continuous AF ≥30 seconds. RESULTS: Among 312 modified intention-to-treat participants (placebo, n = 102; 125 U, n = 104; and 250 U, n = 106), the mean age was 66.9 ± 6.8 years; 17% were female; and 64% had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) only, 12% had CABG + valve, and 24% had valve surgery. The primary endpoint occurred in 46.1% of the placebo group, 36.5% of the 125-U group (relative risk [RR] vs placebo: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.58-1.10; P = 0.16), and 47.2% of the 250-U group (RR vs placebo: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.79-1.37; P = 0.78). The primary endpoint was reduced in the 125-U group in those ≥65 years of age (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.94; P = 0.02) with a greater reduction in CABG-only participants ≥65 years of age (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.87; P = 0.01). Rehospitalization and rates of adverse events were similar across the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the rate of POAF with either dose compared with placebo; however, there was a lower rate of POAF in participants ≥65 years undergoing CABG only and receiving 125 U of AGN-151607. These hypothesis-generating findings require investigation in a larger, adequately powered randomized clinical trial. (Botulinum Toxin Type A [AGN-151607] for the Prevention of Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Participants Undergoing Open-chest Cardiac Surgery [NOVA]; NCT03779841); A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A [AGN 151607] Injections into the Epicardial Fat Pads to Prevent Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Open-Chest Cardiac Surgery; 2017-004399-68).