Impact of a Less Than 50% Residual Stenosis Following Vessel Preparation in Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.

PURPOSE: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been established as first-line therapy in femoropopliteal (FP) intervention, and successful vessel preparation (VP) is considered a key element. However, the clinical impact of successful VP remains unknown. This retrospective study examined the clinical impact of successful VP in DCB FP intervention. METHODS: In total, 268 patients (308 limbs) who underwent successful FP intervention using DCB without atherectomy devices for symptomatic lower extremity artery disease between March 2018 and December 2019 were included in this study (high-dose DCB: 69.8%; low-dose DCB: 30.2%). Successful VP was defined as <50% residual stenosis and

High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated that high-dose drug-coated balloon (HD-DCB) and polymer-based drug-eluting stent (PB-DES) treatments for femoropopliteal (FP) artery disease have favorable outcomes. However, which one would be better remained unrevealed. METHODS: This study used the databases of 2 large-scale multicenter prospective drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) registries. The study included 2470 patients with symptomatic FP lesion treated with IN.PACT Admiral DCB or Eluvia DES at 69 centers. A propensity-score-based paired analysis was conducted. Primary endpoint was 1-year restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were 1-year reocclusion rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR), acute thrombosis, bypass conversion, major amputation, major adverse limb event (MALE), and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 1535 patients were treated with HD-DCB, and 935 patients were treated with PB-DES. The propensity-score matching extracted 678 pairs, with no remarkable intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The 1-year restenosis rate was significantly lower in the PB-DES group than in the HD-DCB group (16.0% vs 22.0%, p=0.016). The other endpoints (reocclusion rate, TLR, acute thrombosis, bypass conversion, major amputation, MALE, and all-cause death) did not differ between the groups. No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effect on the association of HD-DCB vs PB-DES with restenosis risk (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the 1-year TLR, reocclusion rate, and other endpoints did not differ between the PB-DES group and the HD-DCB group despite the lower restenosis in the PB-DES group. CLINICAL IMPACT: One-year restenosis rate was significantly lower in the polymer-based DES group than in the high-dose DCB group for foemoropopliteal disease. However, there is no difference in the other endpoints between two groups.

Difference in one-year late lumen loss between high- and low-dose paclitaxel-coated balloons for femoropopliteal disease.

The objective of the study is to investigate the difference in 1-year late lumen loss (LLL) between the high- (IN.PACT Admiral) and low-dose (Lutonix) paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB). Although a recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated no difference in efficacy endpoint between high- and low-dose PCB, it remains unclear whether high-dose PCB was superior to low-dose PCB in actual clinical practice. We enrolled 64 patients with 67 de novo femoropopliteal lesions who underwent PCB angioplasty at Kokura Memorial Hospital from May 2014 to March 2020 and subsequent follow-up angiography after 1 year. The primary endpoint was 1-year LLL, whereas the secondary endpoints were binary restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) after 1 year. The high- and low-dose PCB groups had 45 and 22 lesions, respectively. Although the low-dose PCB group had higher rates of coronary artery disease, hemodialysis, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia than the high-dose PCB group, the latter had a longer lesion length and more lesions with a TASC classification C or D than the former. The high-dose PCB group had a significantly lower LLL than the low-dose PCB group (0.40 ± 1.05 vs. 1.19 ± 1.03 mm; P = 0.003, respectively). Moreover, the high-dose PCB group had significantly lower rates of binary restenosis at 1 year than the low-dose PCB group (22.2% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.02, respectively). Moreover, negative LLL was only observed in the high-dose PCB group (33.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.005). The high-dose PCB group had a significantly lower LLL than the low-dose PCB group.

Effect of High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Repetition After Drug-Coated Balloon Failure.

PURPOSE: Although the optimal treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions remains debatable, the effectiveness of DCB repetition for DCB restenosis has been reported. However, the optimal DCB repetition strategy is not yet established. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of high-dose DCB repetition with those of low-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, observational study used a clinical database of 677 consecutive patients undergoing FP endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral artery disease between December 2018 and December 2021. Of these patients, 89 cases treated with DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions were analyzed. The primary endpoint was recurrent restenosis (re-restenosis) and the secondary endpoints were recurrent target-lesion revascularization (TLR), re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events (MALE) obtained using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was also performed to explore the effects of the baseline characteristics on the association between high- and low-dose DCB with restenosis risk. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, high-dose DCB demonstrated a significantly higher freedom from re-restenosis compared with low-dose DCB repetition at 1 year (90.4% vs 40.9%, p=0.034). In addition, freedom from re-TLR and MALE at 1 year was significantly higher in the high-dose DCB group (95.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.025; 95.0% vs 54.7%, p=0.025, respectively). Conversely, freedom rates from re-occlusion were not significantly different between the 2 groups (100.0% vs 84.0%, p=0.99). No baseline characteristics or perioperative outcomes had any significant interaction effect on the association of high-dose DCB versus low-dose DCB with restenosis risk. CONCLUSION: For FP DCB restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition offered more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study revealed that for femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition obtained more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition. In addition, there was no significant interaction effect on the association of high- versus low-dose DCB with re-restenosis risk for the baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. This finding might be also a reason for choosing high-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions in daily clinical practice.

Assessment of 3-Year Patency after Endoluminal versus Surgical Bypass Therapy for Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of endoluminal bypass with those of surgical bypass for complex femoropopliteal (FP) arterial lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 530 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford classification 1-3, 66.0%; 4-6, 34.0%) who underwent either endoluminal bypass with Viabahn stent grafts (n = 276) or surgical bypass (n = 254) (with saphenous vein grafts, 74.4%; prosthetic grafts, 25.6%) for FP arterial lesions between 2010 and 2018 were analyzed. The propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of endoluminal bypass with those of surgical bypass. The primary end point was primary patency (freedom from restenosis). The secondary end points were secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb salvage, and overall survival. The interaction effect of baseline characteristics on the association of the revascularization strategy with the risk of restenosis was analyzed using the Poisson mixed-effect model. RESULTS: The propensity score-matched analysis extracted 107 pairs. After propensity score matching, the primary patency rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 84.5%, 75.1%, and 70.9%, respectively, for the endoluminal bypass group versus 78.6%, 73.3%, and 72.0%, respectively, for the surgical bypass group (P = .65). There was no significant difference in secondary patency, freedom from TLR, limb salvage, and overall survival (all P > .05). The subsequent interaction analysis revealed that the involvement of popliteal lesions, small distal reference vessel diameters, and long lesions favored surgical bypass over endoluminal bypass because of improved primary patency (all P for interaction < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year clinical outcomes after endoluminal bypass or surgical bypass for FP arterial lesions were similar.

Clinical outcome of endovascular therapy using a VIABAHN VBX-covered stent for complex aortoiliac artery disease: the AVOCADO II study.

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of a balloon-expandable covered stent (CS) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). However, the real-world clinical outcomes and the underlying factors remain unclear. We assessed the clinical outcomes and factors associated with primary patency after implantation of a balloon-expandable CS for patients with complex AIOD. This prospective multicenter observational study enrolled 149 consecutive patients undergoing VIABAHN® VBX-CS (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) implantation for complex AIOD (age, 74 ± 9 years; male, 74%; diabetes mellitus, 46%; renal failure on dialysis, 23%; chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 26%). The primary study endpoint was 1-year primary patency, and the secondary endpoints were procedural complications, freedom from occlusion, clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and surgical revision at 1 year. Risk factors for restenosis were explored using random survival forest analysis. The median follow-up period was 13.1 months (interquartile range 9.7-14.0 months). Procedural complications were observed in 6.7% of the patients. The 1-year primary patency was 94.8% (95% confidence interval 91.0-98.6%), while the 1-year freedom rate from occlusion, CD-TLR, and surgical revision rates were 96.5% (93.5-99.5%), 94.7% (90.9-98.6%), and 97.8% (95.4-100%), respectively. The presence of chronic total occlusion, aortic bifurcation lesion, the number of disease regions, and TASC-II classification was significantly associated with the restenosis risk. In contrast, the calcification severity, IVUS use, IVUS parameters were not associated with restenosis risk. We observed excellent 1-year real-world outcomes after implantation of a balloon-expandable CS for complex AIOD; only a few perioperative complications occurred.

Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia for isolated infrapopliteal lesion.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who underwent balloon angioplasty for isolated infrapopliteal lesion. METHODS: The study was performed as a single-center, prospective maintained database, retrospective analysis. Between January 2013 and December 2018, consecutive 155 CLTI patients (155 limbs) who primarily underwent balloon angioplasty for de novo isolated infrapopliteal atherosclerotic lesions with Rutherford category class 4 or 5 were identified (IVUS-guided: 92 patients, angio-guided: 63 patients) and included in the analysis. We compared clinical outcomes in IVUS-guided group with that in angio-guided group. The primary endpoint was limb salvage without any reintervention. The main secondary endpoints were wound healing rate and time to wound healing in the tissue loss group. RESULT: Patient and limb characteristics were similar between the two groups. The IVUS-guided group was treated with a larger balloon size for all types of below-the-knee vessel (p < .001), although lesion characteristics, including the QVA-measured vessel diameter, were similar between the two groups. The IVUS-guided group had a higher rate of limb salvage without any reintervention than the angio-guided group (p = 0028). Whereas limb salvage and overall survival was not significantly different. Wound healing was significantly earlier and the time to wound healing was significantly shorter (84 ± 55 days vs. 135 ± 118 days, p = .007) in the IVUS-guided group. CONCLUSION: Limb salvage rate without any reintervention in IIVUS-guided balloon angioplasty group was significantly higher than that in angio-guided balloon angioplasty group in patients with CLTI due to isolated infrapopliteal disease.

Lumen Loss at 1 Year After Bare Nitinol Stent Implantation in the Superficial Femoral Artery.

PURPOSE: To investigate lumen loss (LL) at 1 year after bare nitinol stent (BNS) implantation for de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 701 consecutive patients (mean age 74±9 years; 492 men) with 817 de novo SFA lesions treated with BNS implantation between January 2004 and September 2015. The mean lesion length was 141±88 mm and the mean vessel diameter was 5.4±0.9 mm. The endpoint was LL at 1 year after BNS implantation. Secondary outcomes were restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; estimates are reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). LL was defined as the minimum lumen diameter immediately after BNS implantation minus that at 1 year measured by angiographic quantitative vessel analysis. The distribution of LL in the overall population was estimated using an accelerated failure time model. RESULTS: Mean LL at 1 year was estimated to be 1.74±1.28 mm (95% CI 1.63 to 1.84). Current smoking was positively associated with LL (p=0.015), whereas lack of cilostazol use was correlated with an increase in LL (p=0.001). Reference vessel diameter and lesion length did not have any significant association with LL at 1 year. The 1-year cumulative estimate of restenosis was 25% (95% CI 22% to 28%); the corresponding value for TLR was 18% (95% CI 15% to 21%). CONCLUSION: Mean LL progressed by at least 1.6 mm up to 1 year after BNS implantation. The risk factors for increased LL were current smoker and lack of cilostazol use.

Temporal Course of Vascular Response After Fluoropolymer Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding the vascular response after fluoropolymer paclitaxel-eluting stent (FP-PES) implantation. This study sought to assess the vascular response at 6 and 12 months after FP-PES implantation for femoropopliteal artery lesions using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination.Methods and Results:From the IMPERIAL trial, this study evaluated 10 de novo femoropopliteal lesions treated with FP-PES. The primary study endpoint was neointimal tissue coverage at a 6- and 12-month follow up, as assessed by serial OCT examination. The incidence of peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA) and extra-stent lumen (ESL) was also assessed. A total of 203 matched cross-sectional images were evaluated at 6 and 12 months (5,615 and 5,763 struts, respectively). From 6 to 12 months, the mean neointimal thickness tended to increase from 198 µm to 233 µm, with a significant reduction in the incidence of malapposed struts (0.59% vs. 0.28%, P=0.039). Conversely, uncovered struts and PLIA were more frequently observed at 12 months (4.4% vs. 7.8%, P=0.01; 12.7% vs. 21.0%, P<0.001, respectively). The ESL area significantly increased over time without any difference in its incidence (0.24±0.32 mm2vs. 0.38±0.36 mm2, P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal proliferation was markedly inhibited from 6 to 12 months after FP-PES implantation, whereas the incidence of uncovered struts and PLIA significantly increased over time with the enlargement of ESL.

Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cancer.Methods and Results:Cancer screening was recommended before PCI in consecutive 1,303 patients who underwent their first PCI. By using cancer screening, cancer was diagnosed in 29 patients (2.2%). In total, 185 patients had present or a history of cancer. Patients with cancer more often suffered from non-cardiac death than those without (4.4% vs. 1.5%, P=0.006), and patients with cancer requiring ongoing therapy (n=18) more often suffered from major bleeding compared with those with recently (≤12 months) diagnosed cancer who do not have ongoing therapy (n=59) (16.7% vs. 3.4%, P=0.049). During the 1-year follow up, 25 patients (2.0%) were diagnosed as having cancer, in which 48.0% of bleeding events led to a cancer diagnosis. Patients with high bleeding risk according to the Academic Research Consortium for high bleeding risk (ARC-HBR) were associated with a greater 1-year major bleeding risk than those without high bleeding risk in patients with (7.9% vs. 0.0%, P=0.02) and without cancer (7.1% vs. 2.5%, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer was diagnosed in 2.2% of 1,303 unselected patients before PCI by cancer screening and in 2.0% within 1-year after PCI. Cancer was associated with a greater risk of non-cardiac death, whereas ongoing active cancer was associated with greater risk of major bleeding. ARC-HBR criteria successfully identified high-bleeding risk patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of cancer.

Drug-coated stent implantation vs. bypass surgery for in-stent occlusion after femoropopliteal stenting.

The optimal revascularization for in-stent occlusion (ISO) lesions after femoropopliteal (FP) bare-nitinol stenting has not been established. We, therefore, investigated the comparison between drug-coated stent (DCS) implantation and bypass surgery (BSX) for ISO lesions after FP bare-nitinol stenting. This study was a dual-center, observational study from January 2004 to December 2015. A total of 172 ISO lesions were observed, and after excluding 120 ISO lesions, 52 ISO lesions (50 patients; mean age, 71.0 ± 9.2 years; male, 59.6%) after FP bare-nitinol stenting were enrolled. The included patients with clinical symptoms underwent either DCS implantation (n = 28) or BSX (n = 22). The primary endpoint was recurrent in-stent restenosis (ReISR); secondary endpoints were recurrent target lesion revascularization (ReTLR), recurrent occlusion (reocclusion) and major adverse limb events (MALE), and perioperative complications (POCs), respectively. ReISR or reocclusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after TLR. Stent restenosis was defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) > 2.4 on a duplex scan or ≥ 50% stenosis on angiography. Graft restenosis was defined as a PSV > 300 cm/s and velocity ratio 3.5 or uniformly low PSV < 45 cm/s throughout the entire graft based on graft surveillance. The mean follow-up period was 36.6 ± 25.5 months. At 2 years, the rates of freedom from ReISR, ReTLR, and MALE were not significantly different between the DCS implantation and BSX groups (68.9% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.81; 84.7% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.45; 84.7% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.60, respectively). However, the freedom from reocclusion rate was significantly lower in the DCS implantation group (81.6% vs. 100%, p = 0.04). The occurrence of POCs was not significantly different between the DCS implantation and BSX groups (7.1% vs 4.2%, p = 1.0). Although BSX was the gold-standard therapy for ISO lesions after FP bare-nitinol stenting, DCS implantation might be a good option because the rates of freedom from ReISR, ReTLR, and MALE were similar.

Ten-year clinical outcomes for patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions.

BACKGROUND: Midterm outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) had been well-evaluated; however, 10-year outcomes after EVT are rarely reported. METHODS: A total of 713 patients underwent successful EVT for de novo lesions without acute limb ischemia. We divided patients according to lesion location: aortoiliac lesions only (AI group; n = 260); femoropopliteal lesions with or without aortoiliac lesions (FP group; n = 336); and below-the-knee lesions with or without other lesions (BTK group; n = 117). RESULTS: The clinical follow-up rate was 91% at 10 years. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the BTK group (75%; P < .001) than in the AI group (54%), whereas no significant difference was observed between the FP (53%; P = .76) and AI groups. Compared with patients in the AI group, those in the FP and BTK groups more often suffered from target lesion revascularization (TLR; AI 15% vs FP 50% [P < .001] or BTK 73% [P < .001]) and non-TLR (AI 37% vs FP 49% [P = .005] or BTK 54% [P < .001]); however, after adjusting for baseline characteristics, differences in the risk of non-TLR were marginal between the FP and AI groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.84; P = .051) and BTK and AI groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.25; P = .11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within 10 years after EVT, more than one-half of patients with AI or FP lesions and three-fourths of patients with BTK lesions died. Although the risk of TLR after EVT for AI lesions was relatively low, non-TLR continued to occur up to 10 years, irrespective of lesion location.

IVUS Assessment of the Crossing Pathway of an Intraluminal Reentry Device Used in the Primary Treatment of Infrainguinal Chronic Total Occlusions.

Purpose: To examine with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the crossing pathways of the TruePath reentry device during primary antegrade recanalization of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Methods: Between July 2017 and September 2018, a prospective multicenter study enrolled 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75±9 years; 101 men) with 146 CTOs treated in an antegrade approach using the TruePath reentry device with IVUS assessment of the crossing pathway in successful cases. Outcome measures were complete success (reentry device reached the distal true lumen), assisted success (reentry device use followed by a conventional guidewire to reach the distal true lumen), reentry device crossing route by IVUS assessment, and procedure- and device-related complications. Regression analyses were employed to identify any relevant associations between baseline patient variables and the outcome measures; results are presented as the odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Complete success was achieved in 82 (56.2%) lesions; any success (complete plus assisted) was documented in 117 (80.1%) lesions. Four (3%) perioperative device-related complications were observed. The crossing route was intraplaque for most of the total crossing distance in both complete success cases (95.3%±13.2%) and any success cases (94.8%±14.4%), with relatively short subintimal (3.6%±10.2% and 4.2%±11.2%, respectively) or intramedial (1.2%±5.8% and 1.0%±5.4%, respectively) crossing. CTO length was a significant risk factor for not achieving complete success (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.68, p=0.012), and a history of failed revascularization was associated with not achieving any success (OR 6.40, 95% CI 1.28 to 28.9, p=0.038). Conclusion: The intraplaque route was the primary pathway taken by the TruePath reentry device as it crossed infrainguinal CTOs. Crossing rates were acceptable, with few device-related complications. However, a longer CTO length and a failed revascularization history negatively affected the success rate.

Clinical impact of improvement in the ankle-brachial index after endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease.

Predictive ability of changes in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) after revascularization for long-term clinical outcomes remains unclear. Pre- and postprocedural ABI were recorded for 1307 consecutive patients who underwent their first successful EVT for symptomatic aortoiliac (n = 710) or femoropopliteal (n = 597) lesions. The patients were divided into two groups according to the increase in ABI: ∆ABI ≥ 0.15 (n = 980) and ∆ABI < 0.15 (n = 327). We investigated the association between ABI improvement after EVT and long-term clinical outcomes. The clinical outcome measures included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, target limb revascularization, EVT for target lesion revascularization, major amputation of the target limb, and a composite endpoint that included both target limb revascularization and major amputation. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ∆ABI ≥ 0.15 group than in the ∆ABI < 0.15 group [crude hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.98, P = 0.03]; however, this was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07, P = 0.14). A composite of target limb revascularization and major amputation was less often observed at 10 years in the ΔABI ≥ 0.15 group (258 patients, 38%) compared with the ΔABI < 0.15 group (112 patients, 59%; adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.68, P < 0.001), mainly because of a lower risk of target limb revascularization (adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69, P < 0.001). No significant interactions were noted with regard to the locations of the treated lesions (P for the interaction, 0.13) or preprocedural ABI (P for the interaction, 0.40). An increase of ABI ≥ 0.15 after successful EVT was an independent predictor for freedom from a composite of target limb revascularization and major amputation, irrespective of the locations of the treated lesions and the preprocedural ABI.

Combination therapy of heparin-bonded covered stent and bare-nitinol stent assessed by intravascular ultrasound.

To examine clinical outcomes for combination therapy of heparin-bonded covered stent [VIABAHN™ stent (VIA)] and bare-nitinol stent (BNS), and to determine independent predictors of restenosis after VIA implantation assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted on VIA use in the femoropopliteal artery of 71 patients (81 lesions) treated between June 2012 and November 2018. We divided the treated lesions into two groups; that is, whether BNS was added at the proximal site of the VIA or not (combination of VIA and BNS group [COM; n = 21] vs. VIA group [n = 60]). The median follow-up duration was 21.6 months (interquartile range, 13.2-28.8 months). Restenosis at 2 years was observed in 5 lesions (33%) in COM group and 17 lesions (38%) in VIA group (log-rank, P = 0.74). In VIA group, 14 lesions developed restenosis within 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of VIA group revealed that the proximal plaque burden was an independent predictor of restenosis within 12 months after VIA implantation (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.30, P = 0.01), with the optimal cutoff value of 43% (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.79, sensitivity 91%, specificity 69%). A remaining plaque of > 43% at the proximal reference segment was an independent predictor of restenosis after VIA implantation. When residual stenosis is observed at the proximal site of SFA after VIA implantation, combination therapy of VIA and BNS would be an optimal management.

Spot stenting versus full coverage stenting after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Although spot stenting (SS) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions has been preferred compared with full coverage stenting (FCS), which stenting strategy results in better outcomes has remained unclear in the real-world clinical setting. Therefore, we compared the clinical outcomes of SS and FCS for FP lesions using a propensity-matched analysis. METHODS: The present multicenter, retrospective study examined data from a clinical database of 1554 consecutive patients who had undergone FP endovascular therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease from January 2010 to December 2016. Of these patients, 1151 had undergone FP stenting. The outcome measures were primary patency and primary assisted patency obtained using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was also performed to explore the effects of the baseline characteristics on the association between SS and primary patency. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, SS for FP lesions demonstrated a significantly lower primary patency rate compared with FCS at 3 years (29% vs 53%; P = .011). Additionally, primary assisted patency at 3 years was significantly lower in the group with SS than in the FCS group (53% vs 72%; P = .014). Interaction analysis showed that chronic total occlusion lesions, lesion location A (proximal superficial femoral artery portion), and lesion length ≥138 mm were associated with the noninferiority of SS compared with FCS for primary patency. CONCLUSIONS: The propensity-matched analysis demonstrated that primary patency and primary assisted patency at 3 years were significantly lower with SS compared with FCS for FP lesions in real-world clinical settings. The interaction analysis suggested that SS might be suited to more complex FP lesions (ie, chronic total occlusion lesions, proximal superficial femoral artery lesion, lesion length ≥138 mm).

Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level After Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Claudication.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the 5-year cardiovascular death rate after endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) according to statin therapy status. METHODS: From January 2010 to March 2016, 1324 PAD patients (1670 limbs) with claudication (Rutherford category 1-3) underwent EVT. After excluding 389 patients owing to death or missing data, 935 (70.6%) patients (mean age 72.1±8.7 years; 708 men) were included in the analysis. Statin therapy was prescribed to 509 (54.4%) patients at discharge. LDL-C levels at 3 to 6 months after EVT were correlated with the incidence of cardiovascular death (CVD; procedure-related and proximate cardiac, noncoronary vascular, or unknown causes) at 5 years. A stratifying factor of 100 mg/dL was based on the median LDL-C value (94 mg/dL) in the cohort. Predictors of CVD were sought in multivariate analysis; results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 30.7 months (interquartile range 13.7, 47.6), CVD occurred in 83 (8.9%) patients. The incidence of CVD at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at 3 to 6 months than in those with LDL-C <100 mg/dL (23.5% vs 13.5%, p=0.03). In addition, LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at 3 to 6 months was associated with a higher incidence of CVD (25.2% vs 10.9%, p=0.02) in 509 (54.4%) patients with statin therapy at discharge. In the multivariate model, LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at 3 to 6 months after EVT was an independent predictor of CVD (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.001 to 2.59, p=0.049). CONCLUSION: LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at 3 to 6 months after the EVT for symptomatic lower limb PAD was independently associated with a higher risk of CVD, particularly in patients on statin therapy at discharge. This observation suggests that intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy may be needed to improve clinical outcomes.

Primary Use of the TruePath Crossing Device for Infrainguinal Chronic Total Occlusions With Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the TruePath crossing device as the primary recanalization tool for infrainguinal chronic total occlusions (CTO). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 50 patients (mean age 75 years; 26 men) with 55 infrainguinal CTOs treated with the TruePath between March 2017 and September 2017 at a single center. The mean occlusion length was 138±55 mm, and femoropopliteal lesions accounted for 65% of the 55 lesions. The primary outcome measure was CTO crossing using the TruePath alone; secondary outcomes were assisted success (>50% lumen gain using the TruePath), device-related complications, and intraluminal crossing evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). RESULTS: Complete success was achieved in 33 (60%) of 55 lesions having a mean occlusion length of 145±72 mm. Among these, the true lumen crossing rate was 97% according to IVUS evaluation. Assisted success was achieved in 15 (68%) of the 22 failures. Complete/assisted success, in which the TruePath was thought to have contributed to CTO crossing, was attained in 48 (87%) of the 55 lesions. Three (5.5%) complications were observed: a perforation, an access-site hematoma, and acute occlusion; only the perforation was device related (1.8%). Multivariate analysis showed PACCS grade 4 (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 15.5, p=0.02) was an independent predictor of TruePath failure. CONCLUSION: Primary use of the TruePath crossing device for infrainguinal CTOs demonstrated a satisfactory complete success rate and a high rate of IVUS-documented intraluminal crossing with few device-related complications. Severe calcification is an independent predictor of TruePath failure.

Exacerbated Peri-Stent Contrast Staining on Serial Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography After Platinum-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.

Unlike coronary arteries, little is known about peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) formation after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for infrapopliteal arteries. Herein, we report exacerbated PSS assessed by serial angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) after platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) implantation for infrapopliteal artery lesions. A 68-year-old women with recurrent left critical limb ischemia was admitted to our hospital. Standard endovascular techniques were performed for the popliteal artery (POP) and tibioperoneal trunk (TPT), but residual stenosis occurred. Therefore, a 4.0 × 38-mm PtCr-EES was placed from the distal POP to TPT using OCT guidance. Ten months later, the patient was referred to our hospital due to recurrent left leg rest pain. Angiography showed severe stenosis from the distal POP to the proximal site of the stent, and diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). At the ISR site, stent fracture and compression were observed and vessel evaginations were newly detected on OCT. At that time, good angiographic results were obtained by conventional balloon angioplasty alone. At 6 months follow-up, recurrence of ISR was suspected on duplex ultrasonography. Angiography showed no significant ISR, but PSS had markedly exacerbated from focal type to segmental type. OCT showed exacerbated vessel evagination and in-stent thrombus. The incidence and clinical impact of PSS after DES implantation in infrapopliteal artery lesions remain unclear; therefore, careful follow-up may be needed in such cases.

Impact of Cilostazol Administration on Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether administering cilostazol after treatment for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) can have a positive impact on recurrent ISR (Re-ISR). METHODS: The database of a multicenter, retrospective, observational registry was interrogated to identify 338 consecutive patients (mean age 72.3±8.8 years; 148 men) who underwent endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal ISR in 379 limbs from January 2010 to December 2014. Ninety-seven patients (103 limbs) who received cilostazol after the initial stent implantation procedure were excluded. This left 24 ISR patients (30 limbs) who received cilostazol initially after ISR treatment for comparison with 217 ISR patients (246 limbs) who did not receive the drug. The primary endpoint was 2-year Re-ISR after treatment. The secondary endpoints were recurrent target lesion revascularization (Re-TLR) and reocclusion at 2 years. Restenosis was determined by a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 on a duplex scan or >50% stenosis on angiography. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 23.3±15.5 months. At 2 years, freedom from Re-ISR was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the no cilostazol group (48.6% vs 32.4%, p=0.047). However, freedom from Re-TLR and reocclusion between the 2 groups did not differ significantly [64.7% vs 53.8% (p=0.15) and 88.3% vs 73.9% (p=0.11), respectively]. After adjusting for prespecified risk factors, cilostazol administration was a negative predictor of Re-ISR. CONCLUSION: This small comparative study suggests that administering cilostazol for ISR lesions after femoropopliteal stenting reduces recurrent ISR.