Peer Activate: A Feasibility Trial of a Peer-Delivered Intervention to Decrease Disparities in Substance Use, Depression, and Linkage to Substance Use Treatment.

Although effective evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist, racial/ethnic minority individuals with lower income are less likely to have access to these interventions and may experience greater stigma in the health care system, resulting in disproportionate rates of morbidity and mortality. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) may be uniquely suited to address barriers faced by those from impoverished areas; however, peers have not traditionally been trained in implementing EBIs. The current open-label trial (N = 8) was performed to evaluate implementation and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted EBI supporting recovery, linkage to treatment, and reduced depression. Results suggest the intervention was feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for linking individuals from a community setting to substance use treatment and could be delivered with fidelity by a peer interventionist. Participants who completed the intervention demonstrated clinically reliable decreases in substance use and depressive symptoms. Findings provide initial support for PRS dissemination of EBIs to increase linkage to care and support recovery in traditionally underserved populations. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 61(11), 23-31.].

Act Healthy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating a Behavioral Activation Intervention to Address Substance Use and Medication Adherence Among Low-Income, Black/African American Individuals Living with HIV/AIDS.

There is a need for parsimonious behavioral interventions to support HIV and substance use treatment outcomes for low-income, Black/African American individuals living with HIV. This randomized clinical trial (N = 61) evaluated Act Healthy (AH), an integrated behavioral intervention to reduce substance use and improve medication adherence, compared to supportive counseling (SC) plus Life-Steps medication adherence counseling on substance use, craving, adherence-related outcomes, and depression over one year. Participants in AH had significantly steeper decreases in cravings compared to SC, but no significant differences in substance use. Across both groups, there was a significant increase in probability of being on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (86% on ART at 12 months vs. 56% at baseline), and a significant decrease in medication nonadherence. Findings provide preliminary support for an intervention to reduce cravings and strategies to improve ART use in a hard-to-reach, vulnerable population at high risk for poor treatment outcomes and ongoing HIV transmission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration number: identifier: NCT01351454. Retrospectively registered on May 10, 2011.

Substance Use Outcomes Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Living with HIV Following Residential Substance Use Treatment in Washington, DC.

This study explored how sexual or gender minority (SGM) status influenced substance use (SU) treatment outcomes in a predominantly African American and unemployed sample of people with HIV. N = 60 participants were enrolled in an abstinence-focused inpatient SU treatment center, followed by outpatient treatment sessions. At 12-months follow-up, the survival rate (i.e. those who did not reuse substances) was 37.6% (non-SGM group) vs. 4.8% (SGM group). The impact of SGM status on reuse was .54 log odds, p = .11, which translates to a 71.8% increase in the hazard of reusing substances for SGM vs. non-SGM individuals. For both groups, frequency of reuse remained stable and problems associated with SU decreased over time. Results suggest a potentially clinically relevant finding that SGM individuals have possible heigh-tened risk of SU after a mixed inpatient-outpatient program. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration number: NCT01351454.

Psychosocial challenges affecting patient-defined medication for opioid use disorder treatment outcomes in a low-income, underserved population: Application of the social-ecological framework.

INTRODUCTION: Successful engagement with medication treatment for opioid use disorder is an important focus in reducing mortality associated with the opioid crisis. Mortality remains at unacceptably high levels, pointing to a need for improved understanding of factors that affect medication for opioid use disorder outcomes. This study aims to understand how barriers co-occur and interact to interfere with outcomes in methadone treatment for a low-income, underserved patient population with opioid use disorder. METHODS: This study was conducted at a community-based drug treatment center that serves a predominately low-income, racially diverse population. Guided by the social-ecological framework, we analyzed semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients and providers working in opioid use disorder care and recovery across Baltimore City (N = 32) to assess factors that influence methadone treatment outcomes, and how barriers co-occur and interact to worsen treatment outcomes. The study used patient-centered definitions to describe successful treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Barriers described by both patients and providers fit into several broad levels: individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and stigma. Participants described co-occurrence of many barriers. Further, the study identified potential interactive effects, such that interrelated barriers were seen as fueling one another and having a deleterious effect on treatment outcomes. Specifically, interrelationships between barriers were described for 1) unstable housing with social influences and mental health factors; 2) transportation with poor physical health and other competing responsibilities; 3) treatment program policies and schedule with competing responsibilities; and 4) stigma with poor physical and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding barriers to successful medication for opioid use disorder outcomes and considering their co-occurrence may help to identify and promote interventions to mitigate their impact. This work is intended to guide future research to adapt conceptual frameworks for understanding psychosocial and structural barriers affecting opioid use disorder treatment and ultimately intervention efforts to improve treatment outcomes.

What motivates community mental and behavioral health organizations to participate in LGBTQ+ cultural competency trainings?

The constantly evolving language, understanding, and cultural context regarding the mental health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender diverse individuals (LGBTQ+) require mental health providers to obtain LGBTQ+ cultural competency training to be affirmative and effective with this population. Unfortunately, many providers are not obtaining this ongoing training and mental health disparities continue to plague LGBTQ+ populations. Guided by the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted eight focus groups with community mental and behavioral health organization (MBHO) administrators (e.g., directors, clinical supervisors) and therapists to explore what factors facilitated or inhibited their adoption and implementation of a multicomponent LGBTQ+ cultural competency training program that required administrator and therapist participation in multiple learning sessions over several months (i.e., workshop, clinical consultation, and organizational technical assistance). Results from template analysis supported CFIR-aligned themes, including characteristics of individuals, inner setting, outer setting, and process, and two additional codes-marketing and other/previous training opportunities-emerged from the focus group data. Findings suggest that therapists are motivated to engage in such a program because they want to feel more efficacious, and administrators see the benefits of LGBTQ+ training programs for their clientele and marketing. Barriers to adoption and implementation include cost and personnel resistance, although participants believed these barriers were surmountable. Emphasizing therapist efficacy, clientele need, and benefits for marketing mental and behavioral health services could motivate MBHOs' and therapists' adoption and implementation of LGBTQ+ cultural competency training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Peer-delivered services for substance use in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Addressing the burden of disease associated with substance use is a global priority, yet access to treatment is limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Peers, individuals with lived experience of substance use, may play an important role in expanding access to treatment, supporting outcomes, and reducing stigma. While peer-delivered services for substance use have been scaling up in high-income countries (HICs), less is known about their application in LMICs. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence of peer-delivered services for substance use in LMICs. METHODS: PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, PubMed, and six region-specific databases were searched, and articles that described peer-delivered services for substance use and related outcomes in LMICs were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using tools appropriate for each study design. To provide a more stringent evaluation of structured interventions, a subset of articles was analyzed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) framework. RESULTS: The search yielded 6540 articles. These were narrowed down to 34 included articles. Articles spanned four continents, included quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and primarily targeted infectious disease risk behaviors. Ten articles were included in the EPOC sub-analysis. In the context of high risk of bias, some of these articles demonstrated positive impacts of the peer-delivered services, including reductions in risk behaviors and increases in infectious disease knowledge scores, while many others showed no significant difference in outcomes between peer intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-delivered services may be feasible for addressing substance use and reducing infectious disease risk behaviors in LMICs, where there are severe human resource shortages. Globally, peers' lived experience is valuable for engaging patients in substance use treatment and harm reduction services. Further research is needed to better characterize and quantify outcomes for peer-delivered services for substance use in LMICs.