RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the recommendations of statins treatment for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), treatment adherence and persistence are still a concern. This study examined the real world practice of long-term adherence and persistence to statins treatment initiated after hospital discharge for ASCVD, and their associated factors in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: Post discharge statin prescriptions between 2006 and 2012 were extracted from the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database. Good adherence, defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥0.8 and mean medication possession ratio (MPR), was measured every 180-day period. Non-persistence was defined on the date patients failed to refill statin for 90 days after the end of the last prescription. Their associations with influential factors were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation and Cox's proportional hazard model. RESULTS: There was a total of 185,252 post-discharge statin initiations (from 169,624 patients) and followed for 467,398 patient-years in the study cohort. Percentage of good adherence (mean MPR) was 71% (0.87) at 6-months; declined to 54% (0.68), 47% (0.59), and 42% (0.50) at end of year 1, 2, and 7, respectively. Persistence in statin treatment was 86, 67, 50, and 25% at 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 7-year, respectively. Comparing the statin-cohort initiated from year 2006 to 2012, 1-year persistence increased from 58 to 73%, and 1-year good adherence improved from 45 to 61%. Factors associated with sub-optimal adherence and non-persistence included: prescription by primary care clinics or non-cardiology specialties; patients' age > 75 years; no history of previous statin use; ASCVD events with ischemic stroke diagnosis; comorbidities of renal disease, liver disease, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improving trends, long-term adherence and persistence of statin treatment were suboptimal in Taiwan. Strategies to maintain statin treatment adherence and persistence need to be implemented to further enhance the positive trend.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Lipídeos/sangue , Adesão à Medicação , Alta do Paciente , Prevenção Secundária , Idoso , Aterosclerose/sangue , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Dislipidemias/sangue , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to summarize healthcare costs incurred by patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who developed ischaemic stroke, explore factors associated with increased cost, and highlight the importance of anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the health economic evaluation database was conducted up to December 2015. Studies focused on the cost and/or resource utilization of ischaemic stroke in patients with AF were included. Reported costs were converted to international dollars (I$) and adjusted to 2015 values. Alongside the narrative review of included studies, Spearman's correlation, independent-samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA were used to explore factors associated with cost differences between studies. Sixteen studies published from nine countries were identified. Based on currency conversion rates in 2015, ischaemic stroke-related healthcare costs were estimated to be I$41 420, I$12 895, and I$8184 for high-income, upper middle-income, and lower middle-income economies, respectively. Local GDP per capita accounted for â¼50% of the healthcare cost variation among countries. Major component of overall cost was from hospitalization. Ischaemic stroke incurring in patients with AF ≥75 years was 2.3 times that of their younger peers (P = 0.049). The economic burden from ischaemic stroke in patients with AF is considerable with positive association to country income. Clinicians and stakeholders should be aware of the importance of anticoagulation therapies in stroke prophylaxis, the occurrence of stroke, and the downstream economic burden on an increasingly ageing population.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/economia , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/economia , Isquemia Encefálica/economia , Isquemia Encefálica/prevenção & controle , Custos de Medicamentos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) and FOLFOX 4 (5-FU + folinic acid + oxaliplatin) have shown similar improvements in survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). A US cost-minimization study found that the two regimens had similar costs from a healthcare provider perspective but XELOX had lower costs than FOLFOX4 from a societal perspective, while a Japanese cost-effectiveness study found XELOX had superior cost-effectiveness. This study compared the costs of XELOX and FOLFOX4 in patients with MCRC recently treated in two oncology departments in Hong Kong. METHODS: Cost data were collected from the medical records of 60 consecutive patients (30 received XELOX and 30 FOLFOX4) from two hospitals. Drug costs, outpatient visits, hospital days and investigations were recorded and expressed as cost per patient from the healthcare provider perspective. Estimated travel and time costs were included in a societal perspective analysis. All costs were classed as either scheduled (associated with planned chemotherapy and follow-up) or unscheduled (unplanned visits or admissions and associated tests and medicines). Costs were based on government and hospital sources and expressed in US dollars (US$). RESULTS: XELOX patients received an average of 7.3 chemotherapy cycles (of the 8 planned cycles) and FOLFOX4 patients received 9.2 cycles (of the 12 planned cycles). The scheduled cost per patient per cycle was $2,046 for XELOX and $2,152 for FOLFOX4, while the unscheduled cost was $240 and $421, respectively. Total treatment cost per patient was $16,609 for XELOX and $23,672 for FOLFOX4; the total cost for FOLFOX4 was 37% greater than that of XELOX. The addition of the societal costs increased the total treatment cost per patient to $17,836 for XELOX and $27,455 for FOLFOX4. Sensitivity analyses showed XELOX was still less costly than FOLFOX4 when using full drug regimen costs, incorporating data from a US model with costs and adverse event data from their clinical trial and with the removal of oxaliplatin from both treatment arms. Capecitabine would have to cost around four times its present price in Hong Kong for the total resource cost of treatment with XELOX to equal that of FOLFOX4. CONCLUSION: XELOX costs less than FOLFOX4 for this patient group with MCRC from both the healthcare provider and societal perspectives.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Tomada de Decisões , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/economia , Hong Kong , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/economia , Oxaloacetatos , Viagem/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence and treatment guidelines support the use of statins in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) for secondary prevention of subsequent cardiovascular (CV) event. However, treatment adherence and persistence are still a concern. METHODS: We constructed a retrospective population-based cohort of patients, who initiated statin treatment within 90 days after discharge from hospital for ASCVD using the claims database of Taiwan National Health Insurance. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to measure statin adherence, and PDC ≥80% was defined as good adherence. The study outcomes were subsequent rehospitalisation or in-hospital death due to composite ASCVD, myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke. Their associations with statin prescription adherence or persistence were analysed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The study cohort included 185 252 postdischarge statin initiators. There were 50 015 subsequent ASCVD rehospitalisations including 2858 in-hospital death during 7 years of study period. Good adherence was significantly associated with lower risk of ASCVD rehospitalisation (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.90; 95% CI 0.87 to 0.92) and significantly lower risk of in-hospital death (aHR 0.59; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.65). Compared with constant use of statin, patients in the three less persistent states (recent stop, non-persistence and intermittent use) were associated with higher risk of subsequent ASCVD rehospitalisation, aHRs were 1.16, 1.13 and 1.26, respectively (all p<0.05). The increased risks were consistent with specific outcome of acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Also, patients in the recent stop period had significantly higher risk for fatal CV event. CONCLUSIONS: Good adherence and persistence to statin therapy are significantly associated with lower risk of secondary ASCVD rehospitalisation and in-hospital death.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Many of the cost-effectiveness analyses of apixaban against warfarin focused on Western populations but Asian evidence remains less clear. The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apixaban against warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from a public institutional perspective in Hong Kong. METHODS: We used a Markov model incorporating 12 health state transitions, and simulated the disease progression of NVAF in 1,000 hypothetical patients treated with apixaban/warfarin. Risks of clinical events were based on the ARISTOTLE trial and were adjusted with local International Normalized Ratio control, defined as the time in therapeutic range. Real-life input for the model, including patients' demographics and clinical profiles, post-event treatment patterns, and healthcare costs, were determined by a retrospective cohort of 40,569 incident patients retrieved from a Hong Kong-wide electronic medical database. Main outcome measurements included numbers of thromboembolic and bleeding events, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare cost. When comparing apixaban and warfarin, treatment with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) less than one local GDP per capita (USD 33,534 in 2014) was defined to be cost-effective. RESULTS: In the lifetime simulation, fewer numbers of events were estimated for the apixaban group, resulting in reduced event-related direct medical costs. The estimated ICER of apixaban was USD 7,057 per QALY at base-case analysis and ranged from USD 1,061 to 14,867 per QALY under the 116 tested scenarios in deterministic sensitivity analysis. While in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of apixaban being the cost-effective alternative to warfarin was 96% and 98% at a willingness to pay threshold of USD 33,534 and 100,602 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in Chinese patients with NVAF in Hong Kong.