Combined baseline HBcrAg and end-of-treatment HBsAg predict HBV relapse after entecavir or tenofovir cessation.

BACKGROUND: For patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the optimal stopping criteria for entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment remain unclear. METHODS: This study recruited CHB patients with levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <100 IU/mL at the end of treatment (EOT) from Kaohsiung (n = 190) and Linkou (n = 188) Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals for use as development and validation groups, respectively. RESULTS: In the development group, 108 patients with HBsAg ≤40 IU/mL were used for analysis of predictors of HBV relapse and HBsAg loss. Multivariate analysis showed that age, nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced status, baseline hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and HBsAg at EOT were associated independently with virological and clinical relapse. An HBsAg level of 20 IU/mL at EOT was the best cut-off value for minimizing HBV relapse. Patients with EOT HBsAg ≤20 IU/mL had lower virological and clinical relapse rates and higher HBsAg loss rates than those with EOT HBsAg 21-40 IU/mL and HBsAg 41-100 IU/mL in the development and validation groups. The virological and clinical relapse rates were very low (5-year rates: 6.5% and 0%, respectively) and HBsAg loss rate was very high (5-year rate: 81.7%) in patients with a combination of baseline HBcrAg ≤4 log U/mL and EOT HBsAg ≤20 IU/mL in the development group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of baseline HBcrAg ≤4 log U/mL and EOT HBsAg level ≤20 IU/mL might reduce the risk of HBV relapse and increase HBsAg loss rate, and might be helpful for off-NA follow-up strategy.

Incidence and Factors Associated With HBV Relapse After Cessation of Entecavir or Tenofovir in Patients With HBsAg Below 100 IU/mL.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the incidence and factors associated with relapse of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with levels of HB surface antigen (HBsAg) less than 100 IU/mL after cessation of entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. METHODS: We collected data from patients with chronic HBV infection without cirrhosis treated with entecavir from 2007 through 2015 or TDF from 2011 through 2016 in Taiwan. We identified 135 patients with levels of HBsAg less than 100 IU/mL at the end of treatment (79 entecavir and 56 TDF) and collected data from them for a median of 87 weeks (interquartile range, 48-161 wk) for use as the development set. We collected data from 108 patients from separate medical centers in Taiwan, followed up for a median of 126 weeks (interquartile range, 61-214 wk), and used these as the validation group. Post-treatment virologic relapse was defined as a serum HBV DNA level greater than 2000 IU/mL, and clinical relapse was defined as an alanine aminotransferase level greater than 80 U/L and a HBV DNA level greater than 2000 IU/mL. RESULTS: In the development group, the 5-year incidences of virologic relapse, clinical relapse, and HBsAg loss were 40.9%, 32.5%, and 47%, respectively. The baseline HBV DNA and end-of-treatment levels of HBsAg were associated independently with relapse. In the development group, 17.3% of patients with end-of-treatment HBsAg levels less than 40 IU/mL had a virologic relapse within 5 years, whereas 67.6% of patients with a HBsAg level of 40 IU/mL or more had a virologic relapse within 5 years (P < .001); proportions of patients with clinical relapses were 10.2% (HBsAg <40 IU/mL) and 57.6% (HBsAg ≥40 IU/mL; P < .001). In the validation groups, for patients with end-of-treatment HBsAg levels less than 40 IU/mL or 40 IU/mL or more, the rates of virologic relapse at 5 years were 31.1% and 80.5% (P < .001), and rates of clinical relapse were 14.2% and 50.3% (P < .001), respectively. Rates of virologic and clinical relapse within 5 years were low (<10%) in patients with a combination of end-of-treatment HBsAg level less than 40 IU/mL and baseline HBV DNA level less than 5 × 104 IU/mL, or baseline hepatitis B core-related antigen level less than 4 log U/mL in the development group. CONCLUSIONS: An end-of-treatment HBsAg level of 40 IU/mL or less is optimal for stopping nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. Waiting to stop therapy until patients have a combination of baseline HBV DNA level of 5 × 104 IU/mL or hepatitis B core-related antigen of 4 log U/mL and end-of-treatment HBsAg level of 40 IU/mL might reduce the risk of HBV relapse.

Kinetics in HBsAg after Stopping Entecavir or Tenofovir in Patients with Virological Relapse but Not Clinical Relapse.

This study investigated the kinetics in HBsAg and the HBsAg loss rate after entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) cessation in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who achieved virological suppression after virological relapse without clinical relapse. A total 504 HBeAg-negative, non-cirrhotic patients who previously received entecavir or TDF with post-treatment and who were followed up for at least 30 months were included. Of the 504 patients, 128 achieved sustained virological suppression (Group I), and 81 experienced virological relapse without clinical relapse. Of the 81 patients, 52 had intermittent or persistent HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL (Group II), and 29 achieved persistent virological suppression (HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL) for at least 1.5 years (Group III) after virological relapse. A generalized estimating equations analysis showed that Groups I and III experienced larger off-treatment HBsAg declines than Group II (both, p < 0.001). The post-treatment HBsAg declines of Group I and Group III were similar (p = 0.414). A multivariate analysis showed that there were no differences in the HBsAg change and HBsAg decline (p = 0.920 and 0.886, respectively) or HBsAg loss rate (p = 0.192) between Group I and Group III. The patients who achieved persistent viral suppression after HBV relapse without clinical relapse have a similar decline in HBsAg and the HBsAg loss rate as the sustained responders.