Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 39(6): 643-651, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492116

RESUMO

A hypothesized benefit of social participation is that it encourages people to be more physically active. However, limited evidence exists on the association between social participation over the life-course and physical activity in midlife. We sought to apply a life-course framework to examine the association of social participation and device measured physical activity in midlife in the UK. We used the 1970 British Birth Cohort Study (BCS70), which includes all people born in Britain during a single week in 1970. Social participation was assessed at ages 16, 30, 34 and 42. Physical activity was measured by accelerometery at age 46, as mean daily step count and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The associations of social participation and physical activity were tested using two different life-course models: the sensitive period model and the accumulation model. Individuals with medium and high participation compared to no social participation over their life-course had higher mean daily step count and MVPA in midlife, supporting the accumulation model. In the sensitive period model, only those that actively participated at age 42 had higher mean daily steps and MVPA compared to those who did not participate. Our study provides empirical evidence on the importance of sustaining social participation at all ages over the life-course rather than at a particular timepoint of someone's life. If our findings reflect causal effects, interventions to promote social participation throughout the life-course could be an avenue to promote physical activity in middle life.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Participação Social , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reino Unido , Adulto , Estudos Longitudinais , Adolescente , Acelerometria , Estudos de Coortes , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMJ Open ; 8(2): e018974, 2018 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A number of promising automated behaviour change interventions have been developed using advanced phone technology. This paper reviewed the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR)-based interventions designed to promote changes in specific health behaviours. METHODS: A systematic literature review of papers published between January 1990 and September 2017 in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted. From the total of 2546 papers identified, 15 randomised control trials (RCTs) met the eligibility criteria and were included in a random effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore whether behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that were used in the interventions were associated with intervention effectiveness. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed that IVR-based interventions had small but significant effects on promoting medication adherence (OR=1.527, 95% CI 1.207 to 1.932, k=9, p=0.000) and physical activity (Hedges' g=0.254, 95% CI 0.068 to 0.439, k=3, p=0.007). No effects were found for alcohol (Hedges' g=-0.077, 95% CI -0.162 to 0.007, k=4, p=0.073) or diet (Hedges' g=0.130, 95% CI -0.088 to 0.347, k=2, p=0.242). In the medication adherence studies, multivariable meta-regression including six BCTs explained 100% of the observed variance in effect size, but only the BCT 'information about health consequences' was significantly associated with effect size (ß=0.690, SE=0.199, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.08, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: IVR-based interventions appear promising in changing specific health behaviours, such as medication adherence and physical activity. However, more studies are needed to elucidate further the combination of active components of IVR interventions that make them effective and test their feasibility and effectiveness using robust designs and objective outcome measures.


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Interface para o Reconhecimento da Fala , Telefone/instrumentação , Terapia Comportamental/instrumentação , Dieta Saudável , Exercício Físico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sistemas de Alerta/instrumentação , Interface Usuário-Computador
3.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 25(10): 1042-1052, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29745237

RESUMO

Aims The association between progestin-only contraceptive (POC) use and the risk of various cardiometabolic outcomes has rarely been studied. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of POC use on cardiometabolic outcomes including venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, hypertension and diabetes. Methods and results Nineteen observational studies (seven cohort and 12 case-control) were included in this systematic review. Of those, nine studies reported the risk of venous thromboembolism, six reported the risk of myocardial infarction, six reported the risk of stroke, three reported the risk of hypertension and two studies reported the risk of developing diabetes with POC use. The pooled adjusted relative risks (RRs) for venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction and stroke for oral POC users versus non-users based on the random effects model were 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.62), 0.98 (95% CI 0.66-1.47) and 1.02 (95% CI 0.72-1.44), respectively. Stratified analysis by route of administration showed that injectable POC with a RR of 2.62 (95% CI 1.74-3.94), but not oral POCs (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.7-1.62), was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. A decreased risk of venous thromboembolism in a subgroup of women using an intrauterine levonorgestrel device was observed with a RR of 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.89). No effect of POC use on blood pressure was found, but there was an indication for an increased risk of diabetes with injectable POCs, albeit non-significant. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that oral POC use is not associated with an increased risk of developing various cardiometabolic outcomes, whereas injectable POC use might increase the risk of venous thromboembolism.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus/induzido quimicamente , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Tromboembolia Venosa/induzido quimicamente , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Progestinas/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA