Long-term follow-up of HIV-infected patients on dolutegravir monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, dolutegravir monotherapy has been explored as a drug-reduced regimen for HIV patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study, including patients virologically suppressed for ≥6 months, without previous virological failure (VF) under integrase inhibitors (INIs), who had been switched to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg/day). The primary aim was to report the proportion of VF at week 48 (W48) and week 96 (W96) of dolutegravir monotherapy. The evolution from baseline to W48 of residual viraemia on ultra-deep sequencing and HIV DNA was also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Prior to switching to dolutegravir monotherapy, they had a median (IQR) of 15.4 (6.5-19.9) years of antiretroviral exposure, 5.8 (3.2-10.3) years of viral suppression and 687 (461-848) CD4+ cells/mm3. They remained on dolutegravir monotherapy for a median (IQR) of 100 (29-148) weeks. Forty-two out of 61 patients (68.9%) reached W48 and 32 out of 61 patients (52.5%) reached W96. VF occurred in three patients, with the emergence of INI resistance. VF occurred before W24 and in patients pre-exposed to INIs. At W48, the probability of VF (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 5.6% (95% CI = 1.8%-16.4%). The same result was obtained at W96. Detectable residual viraemia did not increase and median HIV DNA did not change significantly (2.4 log/106 cells at baseline and 2.3 log/106 cells at W48). Dolutegravir plasma concentration was above the IC90 in 41/41 samples, from 22 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up showed a low risk of VF under dolutegravir monotherapy, in a selected population of patients with previous long-term virological suppression and low HIV reservoir.

Persistent low-level viraemia in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients is not linked to viral resistance or inadequate drug concentrations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess genotypic sensitivity scores (GSSs), plasma antiretroviral concentrations (PACs) and immunovirological outcomes at Week 96 (W96) in patients with persistent low-level viraemia (LLV). METHODS: On 1 January 2017, we analysed data from patients on three-drug regimens with persistent LLV defined as at least two consecutive plasma viral loads (pVLs) between 21 and 200 copies/mL (including one pVL of ≥50 copies/mL), at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Outcomes were: GSS, PACs and HIV-DNA load at study entry; and virological status and proportion of patients with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at W96. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included, with median age of 52.6 years (IQR 45.2-57.9), last CD4 count of 658 cells/mm3 (IQR 462-909) and total ART duration of 10.2 years (IQR 5.7-15.2). LLV duration was 14.0 months (IQR 5.5-22.3). GSS was 3 in 46/57 (81%) patients and PACs were adequate in 53/57 (93%) patients. Median total HIV-DNA was 2.65 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 2.44-2.86). During follow-up, 26/57 (46%) had experienced ART modifications. At W96, 38/57 (67%) patients remained with LLV, 15/60 (26%) had achieved confirmed pVL of <20 copies/mL and 4/57 (7%) had virological failure. The four virological failures were due to three ART interruptions and one incomplete adherence (selection of Y181C RAM). No factors (patient characteristics at study entry, GSS, PACs, total HIV-DNA load and ART modification) were associated with W96 viral outcome, except for time from HIV diagnosis and the LLV duration at study entry. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients harbouring LLV had no resistance to ART and adequate PACs. Two-thirds of these patients remained with this LLV status.

Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at a low dose (600/100 mg/day) in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia.

Background: Darunavir/ritonavir is a potent PI with a high genetic barrier and pharmacological robustness favourably investigated as monotherapy. Whether darunavir could be dose reduced in the context of monotherapy deserves investigation. Methods: Patients with HIV suppressed viraemia (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL for 12 months) under ART who had switched to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at 600/100 mg/day between 2013 and 2015 were included in this observational 48 week single-centre study. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological success (defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) at week 24. Secondary outcomes included treatment strategy success and resistance. Results: Thirty-one patients were included with the following baseline characteristics [median (IQR)]: age 52 years (47-57), CD4+ 649 cells/mm3 (463-813), ART duration 16.3 years (9.2-22.3), nadir CD4+ 195 cells/mm3 (144-261) and duration of HIV suppression 7.8 years (4.8-9.7). Prior to switch, ART consisted of PI monotherapy for 28 of 31 patients [darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg/day (n = 26), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 1) and atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 1)] and a triple drug regimen for 3 of 31 patients. Within the 48 weeks of follow-up, no virological failure occurred and two patients discontinued 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir due to side effects at week 16 and 40, leading to a virological suppression rate of 100% (95% CI = 89-100) at weeks 24 and 48. Strategy success rates were 96.8% (95% CI = 83.3-99.9) at week 24 and 93.5% (95% CI = 78.6-99.2) at week 48. Median (IQR) Ctrough values of 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir and 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir were 1537 ng/mL (1286-1724) and 1255 ng/mL (873-2161), respectively. Conclusions: A lower dose of darunavir/ritonavir used as monotherapy (600/100 mg/day) was highly effective in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Rates of serum level determinations of antiepileptic drugs in accord with guidelines: A clinical study at a tertiary center.

OBJECTIVE: To compare our rates of appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with those defined in the French guidelines for measuring drug levels of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during the pre- and post-medical/pharmaceutical interventional periods. METHODS: This study was prospectively carried out at a tertiary center (epilepsy unit of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris) between 2013 and 2016 over three time periods. Criteria for appropriateness were those stated in the current French guidelines. The main outcome measure was the percentage of drug level measurements with an appropriate indication, while a second outcome measure was the impact of education on clinical practice. RESULTS: Of the 698 AED level measurements requested, 84% overall were found to have appropriate indications ranging from 75% to 90%, according to French guideline criteria. Rates of appropriate indications for the three most commonly used individual AEDs-valproate, carbamazepine and lamotrigine-were 79.6%, 77.3% and 90.7%, respectively, whereas the requests considered to not have an appropriate indication involved the majority (63.5%) of cases of routine drug monitoring. In addition, dedicated education seems to substantially increase rates of appropriateness. CONCLUSION: At our center, 84% of AED level determinations had an appropriate indication according to a priori defined and reliable criteria. Moreover, it was noted that a specific educational intervention substantially increased rates of appropriateness. Thus, it appears to be crucial to ensure that medical and paramedical staff are aware of the official recommendations to avoid taking unnecessary drug level measurements.

Dolutegravir as monotherapy in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia.

BACKGROUND: Reducing drug burden is a key challenge for achieving lifelong suppressive HIV therapy. Dolutegravir, with a high potency, long half-life and high genetic barrier, offers potential for monotherapy. METHODS: This observational single-centre study enrolled all patients with HIV RNA (viral load) <50 copies/mL for at least 12 months, with CD4 >350 cells/mm(3) and with no failure under integrase inhibitor therapy who had switched from suppressive ART to dolutegravir monotherapy (50 mg/day). Primary outcome was proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/mL at week 24. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients treated for a median ART duration of 17 years (IQR 11-20), virally suppressed for a median of 79 months (IQR 42-95) and with a median CD4 count of 624 cells/mm(3) (IQR 524-761), were enrolled. Baseline ART consisted of a three-drug (n = 10), two-drug (n = 10) or single-drug (n = 8) regimen with integrase inhibitor exposure in 13 patients. The proportion of patients maintaining viral load <50 copies/mL was 96% (95% CI 79%-100%) at week 4, 100% (95% CI = 85%-100%) at week 8, 93% (95% CI 76%-99%) at week 12 and 92% (75-99) at week 24. Three patients (3.70%; 95% CI 3.4%-10.8%) with prior integrase inhibitor experience had HIV RNA rebound with the presence of resistance mutations. Genotyping of HIV DNA using the Sanger method or ultradeep sequencing showed no integrase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) except for the mutation 74I in a patient on a suppressive elvitegravir regimen. The median within- and between-subject variability of dolutegravir C24 was 25% and 34%, respectively. Nine patients with a year of follow-up remained virally suppressed. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir has the potency to be further investigated as a single ART in randomized studies, particularly in patients with no prior exposure to integrase inhibitors.

Rapid plasma viral suppression in naive HIV-infected patients with high CD4 cells and low viraemia initiating a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor strategy: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) strategy can control HIV replication in antiviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV-infected patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low viral load (VL). METHODS: This observational study included all HIV-infected treatment-naive patients with a CD4 cell count >300 cells/mm(3), a plasma HIV RNA between 1000 copies/mL and 30,000 copies/mL and wild-type virus who initiated dual NRTI ART between January 2008 and December 2012. HIV RNA and CD4 cell count were assessed at Day 0, Week (W) 4, W12, W24 and W48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma VL (pVL) <50 copies/mL at W24. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The median (IQR) baseline characteristics were: time since HIV diagnosis, 25 months (8-66 months); CD4 cell count, 592 cells/mm(3) (405-798 cells/mm(3)); HIV RNA, 10,395 copies/mL (4106-16,566 copies/mL); and HIV DNA, 464 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (195-1168 copies/10(6) PBMC). Nineteen patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine and one patient received abacavir/lamivudine. At W12, 88% of the patients with available data (n = 16/18, 95% CI 0.65-0.99) had a pVL <50 copies/mL. Overall, the proportion of patients with a pVL <50 copies/mL was 100% (n = 20/20, 95% CI 0.83-1.0) at W24 and 95% (n = 18/19, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) at W48 (with one patient lost to follow-up and one patient with poor treatment compliance). The median increase in CD4 cells was 83 cells/mm(3) (40-310 cells/mm(3)). There was no discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy for any reason such as lack of efficacy or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that, in patients with a high CD4 cell count and a low VL, a dual NRTI strategy may represent a potentially effective treatment strategy to control HIV replication. This needs to be confirmed in larger controlled clinical studies.

Efficacy of raltegravir switching strategies in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia according to the genotypic sensitivity score.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The lack of antiretroviral (ARV) backbone activity associated with raltegravir has been proposed as the main explanation for virological relapse observed in patients with undetectable viraemia who are switched from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to raltegravir. However ARV activity remains difficult to assess in this context. The aim of our study was to precisely assess the ARV backbone activity in patients with undetectable viraemia who underwent raltegravir switching strategies and to evaluate the efficacy of such switching strategies based on the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS). METHODS: Patients with a plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level of <50 copies/mL on a stable two ARV-class regimen were enrolled if they switched one of their ARV drugs to raltegravir 400 mg twice daily. The GSS was calculated using a genotyping test performed on the HIV-1 RNA of the last plasma measurement with a HIV-1 RNA level of >50 copies/mL before the switch and on the results of all previous genotyping tests. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at week 24. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The proportion of patients with a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at week 24 was 92.9 % (range 83.0-97.2 %) in the intent-to-treat analysis and 98.1 % (90.0-99.7 %) in per-protocol analysis. When the backbone was fully active, the proportion was 100.0 % (86.7-100.0 %) at week 24 and week 48 in the per-protocol analysis. We observed a decrease in plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides of -12.7 % (p = 0.005) and -26.5 % (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir switching strategies are effective when the associated backbone is fully active according to the GSS. In the context of undetectable viraemia, where ARV activity remains difficult to assess, the determination of the GSS requires the entire ARV history of the patient and all previous HIV-RNA genotyping test results.

Non-disclosure of a pregnant woman's HIV status to her partner is associated with non-optimal prevention of mother-to-child transmission.

Our objective was to study relations between non-disclosure of HIV to partner, socio demographics and prevention of HIV mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), among HIV-infected pregnant women enrolled in the French Perinatal Cohort (ANRS-EPF-CO1) from 2005 to 2009 (N = 2,952). Fifteen percent of the women did not disclose their HIV status to their partner. Non-disclosure was more frequent in women diagnosed with HIV infection late in pregnancy, originating from Sub-Saharan Africa or living alone, as well as when the partner was not tested for HIV. Non-disclosure was independently associated with non optimal PMTCT: late initiation of antiretroviral therapy, detectable viral load at delivery and lack of neonatal prophylaxis. Nonetheless, the rate of transmission did not differ according to disclosure status. Factors associated with non-disclosure reflect vulnerability and its association with non optimal PMTCT is a cause for concern although the impact on transmission was limited in this context of universal free access to care.

Etravirine concentrations in the cervicovaginal compartment in HIV-1-infected women receiving etravirine-containing antiretroviral therapy: DIVA 02 study.

We studied the penetration of etravirine and HIV shedding in the genital tract among 12 HIV-1-infected women receiving an etravirine-containing regimen who had <40 copies/ml blood plasma (BP) HIV RNA. None of the cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) samples showed detectable HIV RNA. Median etravirine concentrations were 663 ng/ml in BP and 857 ng/ml in CVF, with a CVF/BP etravirine ratio of approximately 1.2. This good penetration of etravirine may contribute to the control of viral replication in the female genital tract.

Long COVID-19 symptoms: Clinical characteristics and recovery rate among non-severe outpatients over a six-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To describe persistent symptoms in long COVID-19 non-severe outpatients and report the 6-month clinical recovery (CR) rate. METHODS: Observational study enrolling outpatients (≥ 18 years) with confirmed non-severe COVID-19 (positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR or presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies) who consulted for persistent symptoms after the first pandemic wave (March-May 2020). CR was assessed at the 6-month visit and defined as complete (no symptom), partial (persistent symptoms of lower intensity) or lack of recovery (no improvement). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (79% women, mean age: 48 years) enrolled; main symptoms (mean 81 days after acute infection): asthenia/myalgia (77%), dyspnea (51%), headaches (35%), cough (33%). At 6 months (n=56), 30% had complete, 57% partial, and 13% lack of recovery. The proportion of patients with>2 persistent symptoms was 26% at 6 months (main symptoms: dyspnea [54%] and asthenia/myalgia [46%]). CONCLUSION: We observed a slow but high recovery rate at 6 months among these outpatients.

Prevalence and factors associated with symptom persistence: A prospective study of 429 mild COVID-19 outpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent symptoms have recently emerged as a clinical issue in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors in symptomatic non-hospitalized individuals with mild COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients, from March to May 2020, with weekly phone calls from clinical onset until day 30 and up to day 60 in case of persistent symptoms. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients with complete recovery at day 30 and day 60 and factors associated with persistent symptoms. RESULTS: We enrolled 429 individuals mostly women (72.5%) and healthcare workers (72.5%), with a median age of 41.6 years [IQR 30-51.5]. Symptoms included: cough (69.7%), asthenia (68.8%), anosmia (64.8%), headaches (64.6%), myalgia (62.7%), gastrointestinal symptoms (61.8%), fever (61.5%), and ageusia (60.8%). Mean duration of disease was 27 days (95%CI: 25-29). The rate of persistent symptoms was 46.8% at day 30 and 6.5% at day 60 consisting in asthenia (32.6%), anosmia (32.6%), and ageusia (30.4%). The probability of complete recovery was 56.3% (95%CI: 51.7-61.1) at day 30 and 85.6% (95%CI: 81.2-89.4) at day 60. Factors associated with persistent symptoms were age>40 (HR 0.61), female sex (HR 0.70), low cycle threshold (HR 0.78), and ageusia (HR 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 - even in its mild presentation - led to persistent symptoms (up to one month) in nearly half of individuals. Identification of risk factors such as age, gender, ageusia and viral load is crucial for clinical management and argues for the development of antiviral agents.

Upgraded Cobas Ampliprep-Cobas TaqMan version 2.0 HIV-1 RNA quantification assay versus first version: correction of underestimations.

The large underestimations of HIV RNA quantification observed in 17 patients with the first version of Cobas TaqMan assay have been successfully corrected in the upgraded version 2.0. In comparison with the Abbott RealTime assay, the mean difference that was 1.18 log(10) copies/ml is now zero. The discrepancies have disappeared.

Low immune response rate of HIV-infected patients to a single injection of hepatitis A vaccine.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the immune response of HIV-1 positive patients to a single injection of HAV vaccine in a context of vaccine shortage during the 2017 European outbreak. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled all HIV-1 positive patients vaccinated by a single injection of HAV vaccine Vaqta 50®. HAV serology was performed before and>30 days after the vaccine injection. RESULTS: Among the 73 patients, HIV-1 viral load was≤50 copies/mL in 93.2% of the cases. Medians of CD4 and median ratio of T CD4/CD8 cells were 658/mm3 and 0.9, respectively. A low immune response rate (59.7%) was observed among the patients. Responders had a significantly higher CD4/CD8 cell ratio than non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: A serologic control should be recommended in this population in the event of a single injection vaccination schedule. During routine follow-up, and prior to any untoward event, physicians should assess the vaccination coverage of HIV-infected patients.

Increased risk of IRIS-associated tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients receiving Integrase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is associated with a risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after ART initiation. METHODS: Data from all patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis disease and uncontrolled HIV infection from 1997 to 2017 in a French center were retrospectively collected. We evaluated the incidence of tuberculosis-IRIS in patients initiating ART with or without integrase inhibitors (INSTI) RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included: 21 receiving an INSTI regimen and 34 a non-INSTI regimen. Except with regard to ART regimen, the two groups were comparable (median CD4 of 85/mm3). The overall percentage of IRIS was 34% (19/55), with 52% IRIS in INSTI regimen and 23% in non-INSTI regimen respectively (P=0.04). In a multivariate logistic model, we observed an increased risk of IRIS in the INSTI regimen compared to the non-INSTI, with an OR at 3.33 [95% CI, 1.01-11.1] (P=0.05) CONCLUSIONS: ART containing integrase inhibitors could be associated with increased incidence of TB-associated IRIS.

Early symptomatic neurosyphilis and ocular syphilis: A comparative study between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.

OBJECTIVES: Since the 2000s, there has been an increase in prevalence of neurosyphilis (NS) and ocular syphilis (OS). As data about symptomatic NS/OS is limited, this study aims to assess the characteristics of symptomatic NS/OS, according to HIV status. METHODS: We compared the clinical and biological presentation of early symptomatic NS/OS and its outcome in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (93% men, 49% HIV-positive) were included from 2000 to 2016 in two centers, with 67 (69%) having OS, 15 (16%) NS, and 14 (14%) both. HIV-positive patients were younger (P=0.006) and more likely to be males having sex with males (P=0.00048) or to have a history of syphilis (P=0.01). Among 81 OS, there were 43 posterior uveitis (57%), and bilateral involvement was more common in HIV-positive patients (62% versus 38%, P=0.045). Among 29 NS there were 21 cases of cranial nerve involvement (72%), seven meningitis (24%) and 11 paresthesia (38%). Involvement of the VIIIth cranial nerve was the most common (16 cases). Treponemal tests were more commonly found positive in cerebrospinal fluid in HIV-positive patients (88% versus 76%, P=0.04). Visual acuity (VA) always improved after treatment (initial VA logMAR 0.8±0.8 versus 0.1±0.1 at 3 months), but 32% and 18% of the patients still had neurological or ocular impairment respectively six and 12 months after treatment. Non-treponemal serological reversion was observed in 43/50 patients (88%) at six months. CONCLUSION: HIV infection has no consequence on the outcome of NS and OS. Sequelae are common, emphasizing the importance of prevention, and screening, and questioning enhanced treatment.

Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 outpatients: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics, evolution and risk factors for long-term persistence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions (OGD) in COVID-19 outpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in SARS-CoV-2 infected outpatients with OGD. Weekly phone interviews were set up starting from COVID-19 onset symptoms and over the course of 60 days, using standardized questionnaires that included a detailed description of general symptoms and OGD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with complete recovery of OGD at D30. Rate and time to recovery of OGD, as well as risk factors for late recovery (>30 days), were evaluated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Ninety-eight outpatients were included. The median time to onset of OGD after first COVID-19 symptoms was 2 days (IQR 0-4). The 30-day recovery rate from OGD was 67.5% (95% CI 57.1-75.4) and the estimated median time of OGD recovery was 20 days (95% CI 13-26). Risk factors for late recovery of OGD were a complete loss of smell or taste at diagnosis (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.56, P=0.0005) and age over 40 years (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with complete loss of smell or taste and over age 40 are more likely to develop persistent OGD and should rapidly receive sensorial rehabilitation.

Impact of discrepancies between the Abbott realtime and cobas TaqMan assays for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M non-B subtypes.

Viral loads in 249 clinical samples from individual patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 non-B subtypes were determined with both the Abbott RealTime and Cobas TaqMan assays. The differences exceeded 0.5 log for about 20% of samples and 1 log for 3%, with higher values always from the Abbott assay in the latter cases.

CCR5Delta32 59537-G/A promoter polymorphism is associated with low translational efficiency and the loss of CCR5Delta32 protective effects.

We have recently demonstrated that the CCR5Delta32 protein interacts with CCR5 and CXCR4 and down-modulates their cell surface expression. We have also reported the absence of detectable expression of the truncated CCR5Delta32 protein in four out of six human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV(+)) CCR5(-/-) individuals. To explain the defect in protein expression in these samples, we cloned and sequenced the promoter regions of the six HIV(+) individuals. We have identified several polymorphisms in the CCR5Delta32 promoter region, but these polymorphisms were not associated with significant differences in mRNA levels. Coupled in vitro transcription/translation and polyribosome analysis demonstrated a strong association between a variant genotype designated CCR5Delta32 59537-A/A and a low translation efficiency. Protein analysis indicated that the peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two of the HIV(+) CCR5(-/-) individuals carrying the CCR5Delta32 59537-A/A variant expressed trace amounts of CCR5Delta32 protein compared to the individuals carrying the CCR5Delta32 59537-G/G genotype. The results imply that the absence of CCR5Delta32 protein in two HIV(+) individuals is due to a genetic defect in the translation of the protein. Together, these results highlight the importance of the CCR5Delta32 protein as an HIV suppressive factor and provide further insight into the mechanism of the protective effect of the CCR5Delta32 mutation.

Positive effects of combined antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cell homeostasis and function in advanced HIV disease.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) increases CD4(+) cell numbers, but its ability to correct the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-induced immune deficiency remains unknown. A three-phase T cell reconstitution was demonstrated after HAART, with: (i) an early rise of memory CD4(+) cells, (ii) a reduction in T cell activation correlated to the decreasing retroviral activity together with an improved CD4(+) T cell reactivity to recall antigens, and (iii) a late rise of "naïve" CD4(+) lymphocytes while CD8(+) T cells declined, however, without complete normalization of these parameters. Thus, decreasing the HIV load can reverse HIV-driven activation and CD4(+) T cell defects in advanced HIV-infected patients.

[Assisted reproductive techniques in the context of HIV: the infectiologist's point of view]. / Assistance médicale à la procréation dans le contexte du risque viral lié au VIH: point de vue de l'infectiologue.

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in the context of HIV has been possible in France out of research studies since 2001 for couples with one or both partners HIV infected. Couples should fulfil general criteria allowing access to ART and also specific criteria related to the HIV infection and adherence to measures for reduction of viral transmission either to their partner and the child expected. This management is multidisciplinary and brings together gynecologists, obstetricians, reproduction biologists, psychologists or specialized psychiatrists, HIV and hepatitis specialists, virologists and their teams. The patient's assessment should be comprehensive to allow decisions and to answer to the couples' queries in a reasonable delay. The infectious diseases specialist role is multiple: to inform patients according to the HIV disposition for individuals and for the couple, to remind HIV infected women that there are conditions required to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and that the risk remains even if it is very low with specific treatment. For infected men the processing of semen will require at least two tests. The specialist will evaluate the HIV infection progression, the necessity for antiretroviral therapy initiation or modification. Sometimes therapeutic management avoids exclusion of the couple from ART program for immunovirological parameters. Then according to these evaluations the infectious diseases specialist would share his conclusions with the ART specialists allowing them to adapt their decisions of care to the couple fertility situation without fear or constraints related to HIV.