Mesenchymal stromal cells transiently alter the inflammatory milieu post-transplant to delay graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells suppress T-cell function in vitro, a property that has underpinned their use in treating clinical steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However the potential of mesenchymal stromal cells to resolve graft-versus-host disease is confounded by a paucity of pre-clinical data delineating their immunomodulatory effects in vivo. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the influence of timing and dose of donor-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on the kinetics of graft-versus-host disease in two murine models of graft-versus-host disease (major histocompatibility complex-mismatched: UBI-GFP/BL6 [H-2(b)]→BALB/c [H-2(d)] and the sibling transplant mimic, UBI-GFP/BL6 [H-2(b)]→BALB.B [H-2(b)]) using clinically relevant conditioning regimens. We also examined the effect of mesenchymal stromal cell infusion on bone marrow and spleen cellular composition and cytokine secretion in transplant recipients. RESULTS: Despite T-cell suppression in vitro, mesenchymal stromal cells delayed but did not prevent graft-versus-host disease in the major histocompatibility complex-mismatched model. In the sibling transplant model, however, 30% of mesenchymal stromal cell-treated mice did not develop graft-versus-host disease. The timing of administration and dose of the mesenchymal stromal cells influenced their effectiveness in attenuating graft-versus-host disease, such that a low dose of mesenchymal stromal cells administered early was more effective than a high dose of mesenchymal stromal cells given late. Compared to control-treated mice, mesenchymal stromal cell-treated mice had significant reductions in serum and splenic interferon-γ, an important mediator of graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenchymal stromal cells appear to delay death from graft-versus-host disease by transiently altering the inflammatory milieu and reducing levels of interferon-γ. Our data suggest that both the timing of infusion and the dose of mesenchymal stromal cells likely influence these cells' effectiveness in attenuating graft-versus-host disease.

Reduced intensity conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: has it achieved all it set out to?

At its inception, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was heralded as a means to limit toxicity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially for the older patient demographic. The aim was to promote the inherent anti-leukemic activity of the transplant whilst reducing toxicity and transplant-related mortality (TRM). More than 10 years on, much has been learnt about the role of conditioning in determining outcomes after transplantation. The use of RIC as a preparative regimen has increased the number of patients that can benefit from HSCT because the initial therapy is less toxic. However, many of the early pioneers of RIC quickly realized that the toxicity from graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was equally as potent as that from conditioning. Furthermore, questions remain concerning the efficacy of RIC regimens in retaining anti-leukemic immunity, especially in cases of aggressive disease. The undoubted synergy between chemotherapeutic and immunologic treatment of malignancy means that reduction of conditioning intensity to minimal levels may not be entirely logical.

Reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant determines the kinetics of acute graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Preparative myeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) may control malignancy and facilitate engraftment but also contribute to transplant related mortality, cytokine release, and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have decreased transplant related mortality but the incidence of acute GVHD, while delayed, remains unchanged. There are currently no in vivo allogeneic models of RIC HSCT, limiting studies into the mechanism behind RIC-associated GVHD. METHODS: We developed two RIC HSCT models that result in delayed onset GVHD (major histocompatibility complex mismatched (UBI-GFP/BL6 [H-2]-->BALB/c [H-2]) and major histocompatibility complex matched, minor histocompatibility mismatched (UBI-GFP/BL6 [H-2]-->BALB.B [H-2])) enabling the effect of RIC on chimerism, dendritic cell (DC) chimerism, and GVHD to be investigated. RESULTS: In contrast with myeloablative conditioning, we observed that RIC-associated delayed-onset GVHD is characterized by low production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, maintenance of host DC, phenotypic DC activation, increased T-regulatory cell numbers, and a delayed emergence of activated donor DC. Furthermore, changes to the peritransplant milieu in the recipient after RIC lead to the altered activation of DC and the induction of T-regulatory responses. Reduced intensity conditioning recipients suffer less early damage to GVHD target organs. However, as donor cells engraft, activated donor DC and rising levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha are associated with a later onset of severe GVHD. CONCLUSIONS: Delineating the mechanisms underlying delayed onset GVHD in RIC HSCT recipients is vital to improve the prediction of disease onset and allow more targeted interventions for acute GVHD.