Renal transplantation in infants and small children.

There are still concerns about renal transplantation in small children. The aim of this study was to identify prenatal data, underlying diseases, patient and graft survival, graft function and growth in young renal transplant recipients at our center. A retrospective analysis was performed on 50 kidney transplants performed during the period 1981-2008 in children weighing <13 kg. Their median age at transplantation was 1.4 (range 0.4-3.7) years and the median weight was 9.5 (3.4-12.1) kg. The underlying diseases were congenital in 88% of the patients and acquired in 12%. Ten-year patient survival was 88% (82% before 1998 and 95% since 1998). Ten-year graft survival was 82% (75 and 95%, respectively). Graft function (glomerular filtration rate) deteriorated from a mean of 75-48 ml/min/1.73 m(2) within 10 years. There was rapid catch-up growth within the first years post-transplant, from a median height of -2.44 standard deviation score (SDS) at transplantation to -0.74 SDS after 3 years. In small children, patient and graft survival were as good as those in older children. Renal function deteriorated during the first years post-transplant but stabilized within a few years. In most children, there was a substantial improvement in growth within the first years after transplantation.

The efficacy of antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rebound of anti-A/B antibodies in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: As antigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) using the Glycosorb®-ABO columns is becoming increasingly popular in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the efficacy of Glycosorb®-ABO IA in vivo and ex vivo. We also assessed the risk of anti-A/B antibody (ABab) rebound before and after ABOi kidney transplantation. METHODS: A protocol for ABOi living donor kidney transplantation was used, combining four preoperative and three preemptive postoperative Glycosorb®-ABO IAs with rituximab and maintenance immunosuppression. ABabs were determined by a haemagglutination titration technique. RESULTS: ABOi kidney transplantation was attempted 45 times and 43 transplantations were performed. Overall patient survival was 93% and graft survival was 91%. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. Glycosorb®-ABO IA significantly reduced the ABabs in the majority of patients (P < 0.0001). However, in three patients (6.8%), the antibody elimination was incomplete. Inadequate adsorption of core-chain-dependent ABabs may explain this finding, but further studies are needed. In five patients, the preconditioning was interrupted before transplantation, resulting in ABab rebound. Yet, when preconditioning was restarted, the antibodies could be removed as planned. After ABOi transplantation, rebound of ABabs was seen in two patients (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Glycosorb®-ABO IA in combination with rituximab effectively depletes ABabs in most patients, but owing to core-chain-dependent ABabs, Glycosorb®-ABO IA may be less effective than nonspecific techniques for antibody removal in some patients. Rebound before transplantation subsequent to interrupted preconditioning does not hamper a successful ABOi transplantation. Postoperatively, when this protocol for ABOi transplantation is followed, the risk of ABab rebound is small.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in children.

We designed a new protocol to enable safe ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. The new protocol utilizes antigen-specific immunoadsorption rather than unspecific plasma exchange to remove existing anti A/B antibodies and rituximab rather than splenectomy to prevent rebound of antibodies. Sixty patients have so far been successfully transplanted with this protocol and 10 of those have been children. When compared with ABO-compatible transplantations, we could not find any differences in success rate, renal function, or adverse events.

Isoagglutinin adsorption in ABO-incompatible transplantation.

As the demand for kidney transplantation is constantly growing methods to expand the donor pool have become increasingly important. ABO-incompatibility has hitherto been regarded as an absolute contraindication to living donor donation. However, as ABO-incompatibility has accounted for the majority of living donor exclusions, efforts have been made to overcome this immunologic barrier. Successful desensitization protocols thus far, have combined plasmapheresis for antibody removal with splenectomy to reduce the antibody producing B-cell pool, in addition to quadruple immunosuppression. Although good graft function has been achieved, the high risks involved have been deterrent. We have developed a protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab, in combination with standard maintenance immunosuppression (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids). We hypothesized that the anti-A/B antibodies could be effectively eliminated and good graft function achieved, without the complications of coagulopathy and transfusion reactions associated with plasmapheresis. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the substitution of splenectomy with a single dose of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab would further reduce surgical risk as well as the risk of infectious complications. In 2001 the program for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation was started at our center. To date 50 ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have been performed according to the protocol based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab. Safety and efficacy of the protocol has been evaluated in several studies, all showing that the antigen-specific immunoadsorption is well tolerated and without any serious side effects. Patient and graft survival as well as kidney function have been comparable to that of ABO-compatible living donor kidney transplantation and the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection 0%. We conclude that AB0-incompatible kidney transplantation using a protocol based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab, in combination with triple immunosuppressive therapy is safe and effective. ABO-incompatibility following this protocol does not have a negative impact on graft function. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is equivalent to standard ABO-compatible living donor kidney transplantation.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab: a 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In 2001 a protocol for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab was introduced at our center, short-term results being comparable with those of ABO-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney transplantation. Of greater importance, however, is long-term graft function, thus far not evaluated. The aim of this study was therefore to assess long-term results of this protocol. METHODS: Twenty ABOi kidney recipients with more than 12-month follow-up were included in the study: all adult crossmatch negative ABOi kidney recipients (n=15) were compared with an adult ABOc living donor recipient control group (n=30), and all pediatric ABOi kidney recipients (<16 years of age) (n=5) were compared with a group of pediatric ABOc kidney recipients (n=18). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was three years. There was no significant difference in patient survival, nor in graft survival or in the incidence of acute rejection in any of the groups. In the adult kidney recipients mean glomerular filtration rate was equivalent at all time points (79-83 mL/min), as was Deltas-creatinine. In the pediatric groups, Deltas-creatinine was similar but glomerular filtration rate lower among the ABOi kidney recipients. There was a significant reduction (P<0.0001) without rebound in A/B antibody titers after transplantation (median IgG 1:2 and median IgM 1:1>1 year posttransplant) compared with pretransplant levels (median IgG 1:32 and IgM 1:16). CONCLUSION: We conclude that ABOi kidney transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab is equivalent to ABOc living donor kidney transplantation. ABOi transplantation after this protocol does not have a negative impact on long-term graft function.

The European experience.

A new protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation was introduced in 2001. In this protocol, antigen-specific immunoadsorption to remove existing AB antibodies is used in addition to rituximab to prevent rebound of antibodies and conventional immunosuppression (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone). This protocol has successively been implemented in many European centers, primarily in Sweden and Germany but also in the UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Greece and Spain, and almost 200 ABO-incompatible transplantations have now been performed. In a recent 3-center pooled analysis of 60 consecutive ABO-incompatible living-donor transplantations, there were no graft losses that could be related to the ABO incompatibility and, when compared with ABO-compatible transplantations, no difference in graft or patient survival was found.

Present techniques for antibody removal.

Renal transplantation into a patient with a positive cytotoxic cross-match or with an incompatible blood group inevitably results in acute humoral rejection, unless the HLA or anti-A/B antibodies have been removed before transplantation. Although there are several procedures to remove HLA and anti-A/B antibodies, plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption are the most commonly used. In this report, presently available techniques for antibody removal are briefly reviewed.

Preapheresis immunosuppressive induction: necessary or harmful?

In ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, only a few studies have addressed the necessity, duration, and content of immunosuppressive induction therapy. At our center (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden), using a preconditioning regimen consisting of 13 days of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone, we have investigated both short- and long-term renal allograft function (up to 28 days and 1 year after transplantation, respectively) and correlated them to tacrolimus 12-hr trough levels. In summary, during the first 28 days after transplantation, renal allograft function in the ABO-incompatible group was impaired when compared with that observed in the ABO-compatible group. One possible explanation for this finding is the prolonged pretransplantation exposure to tacrolimus in the ABO-incompatible group, resulting in tacrolimus-associated renal toxicity, which slows the reduction in plasma creatinine. In fact, the day before, and also immediately after, the transplantation (for the first 3-4 postoperative days), the tacrolimus 12-hr trough levels in the ABO-incompatible group were greater than in the ABO-compatible group. Possibly, a shorter pretreatment period with tacrolimus or a reduced target tacrolimus trough level could eliminate this difference in postoperative renal allograft function. However, 1 year after transplantation, kidney allograft function in the two study groups was similar.

Comparing the tube and gel techniques for ABO antibody titration, as performed in three European centers.

Data from 60 consecutive ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations performed in Stockholm, Sweden; Freiburg, Germany; and Uppsala, Sweden, revealed significant variation in preoperative A/B antibody levels, with median titers of 1:32, 1:128, and 1:8, respectively. We wanted to investigate whether these differences were method-related. The same samples from 21 healthy blood donors were analyzed in the three centers using current local methods. Results confirmed method-related differences, with higher A/B titers in Freiburg and lower titers in Uppsala compared with Stockholm. Results for the same sample differed by a median of three (range 0 to 6) titer steps. When the same number of samples were analyzed in the three centers using the same gel method and the same test erythrocytes, results differed by a median of one titer step (range 0 to 4) for the same sample. In conclusion, gel hemagglutination technique significantly decreases intercenter variation compared with tube technique.

Long-term results of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab.

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation has gained a renewed interest during the past years. In 2001, a protocol for ABOi kidney transplantation based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab was introduced at our center. In this study long-term graft function using this protocol was assessed. All ABOi kidney recipients with >1-year follow-up (n=15) were compared with all ABO-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney recipients maintained on the same basic immunosuppression (n=27). Patient and graft survival as well as rejections and calculated glomerular filtration rate were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 3 years. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival nor in rejection episodes. Mean glomerular filtration rate (79-83 ml/min) was equivalent at 1, 2, and 3 years in both groups. We conclude that ABOi kidney transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab is equivalent to standard ABOc living donor kidney transplantation. ABOi transplantation following this protocol does not have a negative impact on graft function long-term.

Pharmacodynamics of rituximab in kidney transplantation.

The B-cell depleting anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has become a therapeutic alternative in renal transplantation. However, understanding of the pharmacodynamics is limited. We have therefore studied the effect of single-dose rituximab, in combination with conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy, on the B-cell population in peripheral blood as well as in tissues, in kidney transplant recipients. Forty-nine kidney recipients received single-dose rituximab. The prevalence of B cells was assessed in peripheral blood, kidney transplant tissue, and in lymph nodes. In 88%, complete depletion of B cells in peripheral blood was observed and, 15 months after treatment, B cells were still undetectable in the majority of patients. In kidney tissue, B cells were also completely eliminated. In contrast, the B cells were not eliminated in lymph nodes, although a reduction was observed. In conclusion, single-dose rituximab in kidney transplant recipients evokes a long-term elimination of B-cells in peripheral blood as well as within the kidney transplant.

Implementation of a Protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation--a three-center experience with 60 consecutive transplantations.

BACKGROUND: A new protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has recently been introduced. We report here on the joint experience of the implementation in Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden and Freiburg, Germany. METHODS: The new protocol utilizes antigen-specific immunoadsorption to remove existing ABO-antibodies, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent the rebound of antibodies, and conventional tacrolimus, mycophenolate-mofetil, and prednisolone immunosuppression. Sixty consecutive ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations were included in the study. The outcome is compared with the results of 274 ABO-compatible live donor transplantations performed during the same period. RESULTS: Two of the ABO-incompatible grafts have been lost (non-compliance and death with functioning graft). All the remaining 58 grafts had good renal function at a follow-up of up to 61 months. We did not observe any late rebound of antibodies and there were no humoral rejections. Graft survival was 97% for the ABO-incompatible compared with 95% for the ABO-compatible. Patient survival was 98% in both groups. There was a significant variation in preoperative A/B-antibody titer between the centers, with a median 1:8 in Uppsala, median 1:32 in Stockholm and median 1:128 in Freiburg. More preoperative antibody adsorptions were therefore needed in Freiburg than in Stockholm and Uppsala. CONCLUSIONS: The new protocol was easily implemented and there were no graft losses that could be related to ABO-incompatibility. A significant inter-institutional variation in the measurement of anti-AB-antibodies was found, having a substantial impact on the number of immunoadsorptions and consequently on the total cost for the procedure. A standardized fluorescence-activated cell sorting technique for antibody quantification is much needed.

Incidence of Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression With 2 Different Corticosteroid Minimization Strategies: ADVANCE, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: ADVANCE (NCT01304836) was a phase 4, multicenter, prospectively randomized, open-label, 24-week study comparing the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) with 2 prolonged-release tacrolimus corticosteroid minimization regimens. METHODS: All patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil and 1 bolus of intraoperative corticosteroids (0-1000 mg) as per center policy. Patients in arm 1 received tapered corticosteroids, stopped after day 10, whereas patients in arm 2 received no steroids after the intraoperative bolus. The primary efficacy variable was the diagnosis of PTDM as per American Diabetes Association criteria (2010) at any point up to 24 weeks postkidney transplantation. Secondary efficacy variables included incidence of composite efficacy failure (graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection or severe graft dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4) <30 mL/min per 1.73 m), acute rejection and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The full-analysis set included 1081 patients (arm 1: n = 528, arm 2: n = 553). Baseline characteristics and mean tacrolimus trough levels were comparable between arms. Week 24 Kaplan-Meier estimates of PTDM were similar for arm 1 versus arm 2 (17.4% vs 16.6%; P = 0.579). Incidence of composite efficacy failure, graft and patient survival, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were also comparable between arms. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and acute rejection were significantly higher in arm 2 versus arm 1 (13.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.006 and 25.9% vs 18.2%, P = 0.001, respectively). Tolerability profiles were comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, and mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppressive regimen is efficacious, with a low incidence of PTDM and a manageable tolerability profile over 24 weeks of treatment. A lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was seen in patients receiving corticosteroids tapered over 10 days plus an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus versus those receiving an intraoperative bolus only.

A Prospective Randomized Trial on the Effect of Using an Electronic Monitoring Drug Dispensing Device to Improve Adherence and Compliance.

BACKGROUND: Outcome after renal transplantation depends on patient compliance and adherence for early detection of complications and identification of intervention opportunities. Compliance describes the degree to which patients follow medical advice and take their medications. Adherence has been defined as the extent to which a patients' behavior coincides with clinical prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 7 to 14 days after transplantation into groups with (n = 40) and without (n = 40) an electronic medication dispenser (EMD). The EMD, which was used for the 1-year study period, recorded the date and time the patient took their medications and was monitored via a web-based application. Patients were monitored for 1 year regarding outpatient follow-up visits, emergency hospitalizations, renal biopsies, rejection episodes, renal function, and blood concentration of medications. RESULTS: Compliance in the intervention group was 97.8% (the control group was not assessed). Number of missed doses varied significantly by weekday (P = 0.033); patients were most likely to miss doses on Saturdays and Thursdays. Patients missed a total of 11 follow-up visits. During the study, 92 biopsies were performed on 55 patients (intervention group: 32 [17]; control group, 60 [38]). Biopsy-verified rejection was three times more common among controls (13 patients vs. 4; P = 0.054, not significant). Average P-creatinine level was slightly lower in the intervention group than the control group (131 vs. 150 µmol/L, not significant), whereas mean tacrolimus was similar (7.32 vs. 7.22 ng/mL, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The EMD is associated with high compliance, and there are also indications of a lower rejection rate.

Photopheresis for the treatment of refractory renal graft rejection.

Acute rejection episodes still occur after kidney transplantation in spite of modern immunosuppressive protocols including combined tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The authors present seven cases of biopsy-proven acute rejection after kidney transplantation refractory to conventional rejection therapy with repeated pulses of high-dose steroids followed by polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies that responded well to photopheresis treatment. Photopheresis is an atoxic immunomodulatory apheresis-based treatment with no generalized immunosuppressive action; rather, it is directed at suppressing donor-specific T-cell clones. At the last follow-up, 9 to 43 months after transplantation, all patients had functioning grafts, with serum creatinine levels ranging from 105 to 312 microM. The authors conclude that photopheresis treatment contributed to the favorable outcome. Therefore, the authors are presently designing a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of photopheresis as an adjuvant prophylactic treatment after renal transplantation.

Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study.

BACKGROUND: The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy. METHODS: This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147). RESULTS: The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits.

A longitudinal study of children who received renal transplants 10-20 years ago.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported on our 10-year experience of renal transplantation in children in the cyclosporine era, that is, from December 1981 until December 1991. In this paper, we report on the same children observed for another 10 years. METHODS: Of 53 children who received a renal transplant between 1981 and 1991, 47 survived and were observed for 10 to 20 years. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, prednisolone, and azathioprine. Yearly clinical examinations were performed. RESULTS: Overall, actual patient survival is 91%, 89%, and 89%, and actual graft survival 85%, 77%, and 66% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. No patients have died during the last 10 years. Twenty-six grafts were lost over 20 years. Thirteen of those were lost during the present follow-up (10-20 years): 11 in chronic rejection and 2 because of development of renal cell carcinoma. No other malignancies were noted. Mean glomerular filtration rate decreased from 58+/-19 at 1 year (n=42) to 44+/-16 mL/min/1.73 m2 body surface area at 10 (n=33) years. Hypertension was treated in 46%, 40%, and 66% of the children at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively; two of them showed left ventricular hypertrophy 10 years after transplant. Minor cataracts without visual disturbance were found in 45% of patients. All children except three with mental retardation are, or have been, attending normal day care or normal school. CONCLUSION: Social integration is good, and severe complications are scarce, even when renal transplantation occurred at a very young age.

Successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Historically, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have only been undertaken after splenectomy and unspecific plasmapheresis and with quadruple drug immunosuppression plus B-cell specific drugs. We have evaluated a protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab, and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The protocol called for a 10-day pretransplant conditioning period starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplant days -6, -5, -4, and -1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. RESULTS: Four patients have received transplants with this protocol. The donor-recipient blood groups were A2/O, B/O, B/A, and A1/O. The ABO-antibodies were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level posttransplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects, and all patients have normal renal-transplant function. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that after one infusion each of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin and antigen-specific immunoadsorption, blood-group-incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with standard immunosuppression and without splenectomy.