Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 48(2): 222-225, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832536

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted health care systems, including implementation of lung cancer screening programs. The impact and recovery from this disruption on screening processes is not well appreciated. Herein, the radiology database of a Northeast tertiary health care network was reviewed before and during the pandemic (2013-2022). In the 3 months before the pandemic, an average of 77.3 lung cancer screening with computed tomography scans (LCS-CT) were performed per month. The average dropped to 23.3 between April and June of 2020, whereas COVID-19 hospitalizations peaked at 1604. By July, average hospitalizations dropped to 50, and LCS-CTs rose to >110 per month for the remaining year. LCS-CTs did not decline during COVID-19 surges in December of 2021 and 2022. The LCS-CT performance grew by 4.5% in 2020, 69.6% in 2021, and 27.0% in 2022, exceeding projected growth by 722 examinations. This resiliency indicates a potentially smaller impact of COVID-19 on lung cancer diagnoses than initially feared.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Atenção à Saúde
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(7): 4180-4191, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36869917

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to clarify the association between metastatic pattern and prognosis in stage IV gastric cancer, with a focus on patients presenting with metastases limited to nonregional lymph nodes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the National Cancer Database was used to identify patients ≥ 18 years of age diagnosed with stage IV gastric cancer between 2016 and 2019. Patients were stratified according to pattern of metastatic disease at diagnosis: nonregional lymph nodes only ("stage IV-nodal"), single systemic organ ("stage IV-single organ"), or multiple organs ("stage IV-multi-organ"). Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models in unadjusted and propensity score-matched samples. RESULTS: Overall, 15,050 patients were identified, including 1,349 (8.7%) stage IV-nodal patients. Most patients in each group received chemotherapy [68.6% of stage IV-nodal patients, 65.2% of stage IV-single organ patients, and 63.5% of stage IV-multi-organ patients (p = 0.003)]. Stage IV-nodal patients exhibited better median survival (10.5 months, 95% CI 9.7-11.9, p < 0.001) than single organ (8.0, 95% CI 7.6-8.2) and multi-organ (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-6.0) patients. In the multivariable Cox model, stage IV-nodal patients also exhibited better survival (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85, p < 0.001) than single organ (reference) and multi-organ (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.33, p < 0.001) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 9% of clinical stage IV gastric cancer patients have their distant disease confined to nonregional lymph nodes. These patients were managed similarly to other stage IV patients but experienced a better prognosis, suggesting opportunities to introduce M1 staging subclassifications.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 127(2): 262-268, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36465021

RESUMO

Due to their association with invasive adenocarcinoma, ground glass opacities that reach 3 cm in size, develop a solid component ≥2 mm on mediastinal windows, or exhibit ≥25% annual growth warrant operative resection. Minimally invasive techniques are preferred given that approximately one third of patients will present with multifocal focal disease and may require additional operations. A robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgical approach can be used with percutaneous or bronchoscopic localization techniques and are compatible with developing intraoperative molecular targeting techniques.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Pneumonectomia/métodos
4.
Ann Surg ; 274(1): 146-154, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare morbidity and mortality between nonoperative and operative treatment of pneumoperitoneum. BACKGROUND: Pneumoperitoneum is a potentially life-threatening condition that has been traditionally treated with surgical intervention. Adequately powered studies comparing treatment outcomes are lacking. METHODS: Chart review and computer-assisted abstraction were used to identify patients with pneumoperitoneum at 5 hospitals from 2010 to 2015. Patients with recent abdominal procedures or contained perforation were excluded. Patients were grouped by treatment modality: comfort measures only (CMO), nonoperative treatment, or operative intervention. CMO included only symptom-palliation, whereas nonoperative therapy included all interventions (antibiotics, peritoneal drains, resuscitation) excluding surgery. Outcomes were mortality, discharge disposition, and 30-day complications. Covariates included demographics, comorbidities, and acuity at presentation. RESULTS: Forty patients received CMO, 202 underwent nonoperative treatment, and 199 underwent operative intervention. CMO patients had 98% 30-day mortality. There was no difference in 30-day (P = 0.64) or 2-year mortality (P = 0.53) between patients treated nonoperatively and operatively. Compared with patients treated operatively, patients treated nonoperatively were more likely to have a colorectal source of pneumoperitoneum (37% vs 31%; P = 0.03). Using logistic regression, operative treatment was associated with increased dependence on enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition [odds ratio (OR) 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.99-9.29] and nonhome discharge (OR 3.61, 95% CI, 1.81-7.17). Among patients with clinical peritonitis, operative treatment was associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.17, 95% CI, 0.04-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Operative intervention is associated with reduced mortality in patients with pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis. In the absence of peritonitis, operative treatment is associated with increased morbidity and nonhome discharge.


Assuntos
Pneumoperitônio/terapia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumoperitônio/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Surg Res ; 267: 586-592, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265602

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the place of birth would affect colon cancer survival. METHODS: An observational study of colon cancer patient data using the SEER database from 1973 to 2010 was performed. Patients with more than one primary cancer in their lifetime or patients who were under age 18 were excluded. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed, adjusting for patient demographics and oncological characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 262,618 colon cancer patients were analyzed, with the majority (86.0%) born in the US. The overall 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 51.4% and was significantly lower for US-born than non-US born patients (50.4% vs 58.1%). This difference persisted in local/regional disease and in cases with distant metastasis, and across racial groups. On adjusted analysis, US-born patients had worse disease-specific survivals (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.24-1.33), and this effect persisted in all racial groups except in Asians. CONCLUSION: US-born patients have worse survivals than non-US born patients. This is paradoxical given known disparities in quality of care delivered to immigrant populations. It may be useful to consider including geographical histories in patient interviews.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Adolescente , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Emigração e Imigração , Humanos , Grupos Raciais , Programa de SEER
6.
Anesth Analg ; 132(1): 210-216, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High-quality shared decision-making for patients undergoing elective surgical procedures includes eliciting patient goals and treatment preferences. This is particularly important, should complications occur and life-sustaining therapies be considered. Our objective was to determine the preoperative care preferences of older higher-risk patients undergoing elective procedures and to determine any factors associated with a preference for limitations to life-sustaining treatments. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey conducted between May and December 2018. Patients ≥55 years of age presenting for a preprocedural evaluation in a high-risk anesthesia clinic were queried on their desire for life-sustaining treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and artificial nutrition) as well as tolerance for declines in health states (physical disability, cognitive disability, and daily severe pain). RESULTS: One hundred patients completed the survey. The median patient age was 68. Most patients were Caucasian (87%) and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III (88%). The majority of patients (89%) desired cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, most patients would not accept mechanical ventilation, dialysis, or artificial nutrition for an indefinite period of time. Similarly, most patients (67%-81%) indicated they would not desire treatments to sustain life in the event of permanent physical disability, cognitive disability, or daily severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: Among older, higher-risk patients presenting for elective procedures, most patients chose limitations to life-sustaining treatments. This work highlights the need for an in-depth goals of care discussion and establishment of advance care preferences before a procedure or operative intervention.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Preferência do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Autorrelato , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Ann Surg ; 271(5): 898-905, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30499802

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of open versus laparoscopic surgery on the development of adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: aSBO is a significant contributor to short and long-term postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopy has demonstrated a protective effect in colorectal surgery, but these effects have not been generalized to other abdominal procedures. METHODS: Population level California state data (1995-2010) was analyzed. We identified patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy. The primary outcome was aSBO. Clinical, patient, and hospital characteristics were assessed using Kaplan-Meir methodology and Cox regression analysis adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and operative approach. RESULTS: We included 1,612,629 patients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. The 5-year incidence rate of aSBO was higher after open surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery for each procedure (RYGB 2.1% vs. 1.5%, P < 0.001; cholecystectomy 2.2% vs. 0.65%, P < 0.001; partial colectomy 5.5% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001; appendectomy 0.58% vs. 0.35%, P < 0.001; and hysterectomy 0.89% vs. 0.54%, P < 0.001). The period of greatest risk for aSBO formation was within the first 2-years. In multivariate analysis, an open approach was associated with an increased risk of aSBO for each procedure [RYGB hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, P < 0.001; cholecystectomy HR 1.89, P < 0.001; partial colectomy HR 1.49, P < 0.001; appendectomy HR 1.45, P < 0.001; and hysterectomy HR 1.16, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is associated with a significant and sustained reduction in the rate of aSBO. The period of greatest risk for aSBO is within the first 2 years after surgery.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Histerectomia , Obstrução Intestinal/epidemiologia , Intestino Delgado , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Aderências Teciduais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(13): 4204-4212, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31463695

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given survival measured in months, metrics, such as 30-day mortality, are poorly suited to measure the quality of palliative procedures for patients with advanced cancer. Nationally endorsed process measures associated with high-quality PC include code-status clarification, goals-of-care discussions, palliative-care referral, and hospice assessment. The impact of the performance of these process measures on subsequent healthcare utilization is unknown. METHODS: Administrative data and manual review were used to identify hospital admissions with performance of palliative procedures for advanced pancreatic cancer at two tertiary care hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Natural language processing, a form of computer-assisted abstraction, identified process measures in associated free-text notes. Healthcare utilization was compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: We identified 823 hospital admissions with performance of a palliative procedure. PC process measures were identified in 68% of admissions. Patients with documented process measures were older (66 vs. 63; p = 0.04) and had a longer length of stay (9 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, patients treated by surgeons were less likely to have PC process measures performed (odds ratio 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.37). Performance of PC process measures was associated with decreased healthcare utilization in a Cox proportional hazard model. CONCLUSIONS: PC process measures were not performed in almost one-third of hospital admissions for palliative procedures in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Performance of established high-quality process measures for seriously ill patients undergoing palliative procedures may help patients to avoid burdensome, high-intensity care at the end-of-life.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
9.
J Surg Res ; 240: 80-88, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30909068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the process by which inpatient teams document and convey goals of care (GOC) for critically ill surgical patients. We sought to explore clinician perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to clinician-to-clinician communication and delivery of goal-concordant patient care. METHODS: Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit a multidisciplinary sample of clinicians who held roles in a surgical intensive care unit at a single tertiary care facility. Semistructured interviews with clinicians were conducted between September and December 2017 to assess clinician experiences with communicating and honoring patient GOC. Two independent coders performed qualitative coding in an iterative fashion using a framework approach. Inter-rater agreement was measured by kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Thirty-three clinicians from multiple disciplines including surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, and social work, were interviewed. Analysis revealed that clinicians in all disciplines felt responsible for honoring patient GOC. Conflicts over patient GOC and how to honor them arose between clinicians with longitudinal patient relationships (preoperative and postoperative) and those with single-phase relationships (postoperative). Barriers to clinician-to-clinician communication and delivery of goal-concordant care included inaccessible records, lack of protocols, and difficulty in documenting complex conversations. Facilitators included recognition of a patient's unique treatment priorities and family members with a unified understanding of a patient's GOC. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the clinician-patient relationships and difficulty accessing information about patient preferences contribute to clinician conflicts and concerns with the goal concordance of patient care.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/organização & administração , Comunicação , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Estado Terminal/terapia , Relações Interprofissionais , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Masculino , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Preferência do Paciente , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Qualidade de Vida
10.
J Surg Res ; 241: 235-239, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many articles in the surgical literature were faulted for committing type 2 error, or concluding no difference when the study was "underpowered". However, it is unknown if the current power standard of 0.8 is reasonable in surgical science. METHODS: PubMed was searched for abstracts published in Surgery, JAMA Surgery, and Annals of Surgery and from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016, with Medical Subject Heading terms of randomized controlled trial (RCT) or observational study (OBS) and limited to humans were included (n = 403). Articles were excluded if all reported findings were statistically significant (n = 193), or if presented data were insufficient to calculate power (n = 141). RESULTS: A total of 69 manuscripts (59 RCTs and 10 OBSs) were assessed. Overall, the median power was 0.16 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.08-0.32). The median power was 0.16 for RCTs (IQR 0.08-0.32) and 0.14 for OBSs (IQR 0.09-0.22). Only 4 studies (5.8%) reached or exceeded the current 0.8 standard. Two-thirds of our study sample had an a priori power calculation (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: High-impact surgical science was routinely unable to reach the arbitrary power standard of 0.8. The academic surgical community should reconsider the power threshold as it applies to surgical investigations. We contend that the blueprint for the redesign should include benchmarking the power of articles on a gradient scale, instead of aiming for an unreasonable threshold.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Tamanho da Amostra
15.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(2): 1180-1190, 2024 Feb 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505043

RESUMO

Background: Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery with spontaneous breathing is rarely utilized, but may have several advantages over standard intubation, especially in those with significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities. In this study we evaluate the safety, feasibility, and 3-year survival of thoracoscopic surgery without endotracheal intubation for oncologic and non-oncologic indications. Methods: All consecutive patients [2018-2022] selected for lung resection or other pleural space intervention under local anesthesia and sedation were compared to a cohort undergoing elective thoracoscopic procedures with endotracheal intubation. A propensity-score matched cohort was used to compare perioperative outcomes and 3-year overall survival. Results: A total of 72 patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery without intubation compared to 1,741 who were intubated. Non-intubated procedures included 19 lobectomies (26.4%), 9 segmentectomies (12.5%), 25 wedge resections (34.7%), and 19 pleural or mediastinal resections (26.4%). Non-intubated patients had a lower average body mass index (BMI; 24.6 vs. 27.1 kg/m2, P<0.001) and a higher comorbidity burden. Primary lung cancer was the indication in 30 (41.7%) non-intubated patients. The non-intubated cohort had no operative or 30-day mortality. After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in pre-operative factors. In propensity-score matched analysis, non-intubated patients had shorter median total operating room time (109 vs. 159 min, P<0.001) and procedure time (69 vs. 119 min, P<0.001). Peri-operative morbidity was rare and did not differ between intubated and non-intubated patients. There was no significant difference in 3-year survival associated with non-intubation in the propensity-score matched cohorts (95% vs. 89%, P=0.10) or in a Cox proportional hazard model [hazard ratio (HR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-3.67; P=0.81]. Conclusions: Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in carefully selected patients for both benign and oncologic indications.

16.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 25(3): e113-e123, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310034

RESUMO

Lobectomy has been the standard treatment for stage I lung cancer in healthy patients, largely based on a randomized trial published in 1995. Nevertheless, research has continued regarding the role of sublobar resection. Three additional randomized trials addressing resection extent in healthy patients have recently been published. These 4 trials involve differences in design, eligibility, interventions, and intraoperative processes. Patients were ineligible if intraoperative assessment demonstrated stage > IA or inadequate resection margins. All trials consistently show no differences in perioperative morbidity, mortality, and postoperative changes in lung function between sublobar resection and lobectomy-consistent with other nonrandomized evidence. Long-term outcomes are generally encouraging of lesser resection, but some inconsistencies are apparent. The 2 larger recent trials demonstrated no overall survival difference while the others suggested better survival after lobectomy versus sublobar resection. Recurrence-free survival was found to be the same after lobectomy versus sublobar resection in 3 trials, despite higher locoregional recurrences after sublobar resection. The low 5-year recurrence-free survival (64%, regardless of resection extent) in 1 recent trial highlights the need for further optimization. Thus, there is high-level evidence that sublobar resection is a reasonable alternative to lobectomy in healthy patients. However, variability in long-term results suggests that aspects of patients, tumors and interventions need to be better understood. Therefore, we propose to apply sublobar resection cautiously; especially because there are no short-term benefits. Sublobar resection requires careful attention to intraoperative details (nodes, margins), and may be best suited for less aggressive (eg, ground glass, slow growing) tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pneumonectomia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
17.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 167(3): 822-833.e7, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500052

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing SBRT versus those undergoing surgery. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients without documented comorbidities who underwent surgical resection (lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection) or SBRT for clinical stage I NSCLC between 2012 and 2018. Peritreatment mortality and 5-year OS were compared among propensity score-matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 30,658 patients were identified, including 24,729 (80.7%) who underwent surgery and 5929 (19.3%) treated with SBRT. Between 2012 and 2018, the proportion of patients receiving SBRT increased from 15.9% to 26.0% (P < .001). The 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality were higher among patients undergoing surgical resection versus those receiving SBRT (1.7% vs 0.3%, P < .001; 2.8% vs 1.7%, P < .001). In propensity score-matched patients, OS favored SBRT for the first several months, but this was reversed before 1 year and significantly favored surgical management in the long term (5-year OS, 71.0% vs 41.8%; P < .001). The propensity score-matched analysis was repeated to include only SBRT patients who had documented refusal of a recommended surgery, which again demonstrated superior 5-year OS with surgical management (71.4% vs 55.9%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is being increasingly used to treat early-stage lung cancer in low-comorbidity patients. However, for patients who may be candidates for either treatment, the long-term OS favors surgical management.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirurgia , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/cirurgia , Comorbidade
18.
Surgery ; 2024 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025691

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of esophageal perforation includes open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and endoscopic stent placement. This study analyzed initial treatment and the associated short-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2019 identified adults >18 years with esophageal perforation undergoing an initial nonelective esophageal procedure categorized into either open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, or endoscopic stent placement. Patients with esophageal cancer were excluded. Baseline characteristics and the van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were identified. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and postintervention complications. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to compare in-hospital survival. RESULTS: In total, 3,345 patients met inclusion criteria: the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 50-72 years), and 1,310 (39%) were female. Open procedure was pursued in 2,650 (79%), minimally invasive surgery in 310 (9%), and endoscopic stent placement in 385 (12%) with no differences in van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index or mortality. Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a greater proportion of gastrointestinal complications (P = .006); otherwise, there were no differences in postintervention complications. In total, 380 (11%) patients died and were significantly older, with greater van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and had more postintervention complications. Univariable Cox regression identified age (hazard ratio 1.95, P < .001), van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio 1.06, P < .001), stent placement (hazard ratio 1.93, P = .045), and transfer from a health facility (HR 2.40, P = .049) as associated with decreased in-hospital survival. Multivariable Cox regression revealed age (hazard ratio 1.041, P < .001) and van Walraven-weighted Elixhauser comorbidity index (hazard ratio 1.055, P < .001) were associated with decreased in-hospital survival. CONCLUSION: Patients with esophageal perforation had an 11% in-hospital mortality rate and significant associated complications regardless of intervention. Increasing age and comorbidities are associated with poorer in-hospital survival.

19.
J Clin Densitom ; 16(1): 54-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23374742

RESUMO

Parathyroidectomy is the optimal treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and provides a cure in the vast majority of cases. Over the last 2 decades, improvements in preoperative localization and the development of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring have opened the door for new surgical approaches to parathyroidectomy. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is performed under regional or local anesthesia. It requires less surgical dissection resulting in decreased trauma to tissues and is more effective and less costly than traditional bilateral cervical exploration. This article reviews our approach reflecting advances in preoperative localization, anesthetic techniques, and intraoperative management of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for the treatment of PHPT.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Paratireoidectomia/métodos , Adenoma/cirurgia , Anestesia por Condução , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/cirurgia , Paratireoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
20.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 107(10): 4669-74, 2010 Mar 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20207947

RESUMO

Biodegradable scaffolds seeded with bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs) are the earliest tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) to be used clinically. These TEVGs transform into living blood vessels in vivo, with an endothelial cell (EC) lining invested by smooth muscle cells (SMCs); however, the process by which this occurs is unclear. To test if the seeded BMCs differentiate into the mature vascular cells of the neovessel, we implanted an immunodeficient mouse recipient with human BMC (hBMC)-seeded scaffolds. As in humans, TEVGs implanted in a mouse host as venous interposition grafts gradually transformed into living blood vessels over a 6-month time course. Seeded hBMCs, however, were no longer detectable within a few days of implantation. Instead, scaffolds were initially repopulated by mouse monocytes and subsequently repopulated by mouse SMCs and ECs. Seeded BMCs secreted significant amounts of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and increased early monocyte recruitment. These findings suggest TEVGs transform into functional neovessels via an inflammatory process of vascular remodeling.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Vasos Sanguíneos/fisiopatologia , Engenharia Tecidual/métodos , Animais , Vasos Sanguíneos/metabolismo , Vasos Sanguíneos/patologia , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Células da Medula Óssea/metabolismo , Células da Medula Óssea/ultraestrutura , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Diferenciação Celular , Células Cultivadas , Quimiocina CCL2/metabolismo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Inflamação/fisiopatologia , Camundongos , Camundongos SCID , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Molécula-1 de Adesão Celular Endotelial a Plaquetas/metabolismo , Alicerces Teciduais , Transplante Heterólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA