Impact of metabolic syndrome and its components on heart rate variability during hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Both uremia and metabolic syndrome (MetS) affect heart rate variability (HRV) which is a risk factor of poor prognoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MetS on HRV among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in a teaching hospital in Northern Taiwan from June to August, 2010. Adult patients on chronic hemodialysis without active medical conditions were enrolled. HRV were measured for 4 times on the index hemodialysis day (HRV-0, -1, -2, and -3 at before, initial, middle, and late phases of hemodialysis, respectively), and the baseline demographic data and clinical parameters during the hemodialysis session were documented. Then we evaluated the impacts of MetS and its five components on HRV. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five patients (100 women, mean age 65.1 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled and included those with MetS (n = 91, 52 %) and without MetS (n = 84, 48 %). The patients with MetS(+) had significantly lower very low frequency, total power, and variance in HRV-0, total power and variance in HRV-2, and variance in HRV-3. (all p ≦ 0.05) When using the individual components of MetS to evaluate the impacts on HRV indices, the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion significantly affected most indices of HRV while other four components including "waist circumference", "triglycerides", "blood pressure", and "high-density lipoprotein" criteria exhibited little impacts on HRV. FPG criterion carried the most powerful influence on cardiac ANS, which was even higher than that of MetS. The HRV of patients with FPG(+) increased initially during the hemodialysis, but turned to decrease dramatically at the late phase of hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of FPG(+) outstood the influence of uremic autonomic dysfunction, and FPG criterion was the most important one among all the components of MetS to influence HRV. These results underscored the importance of interpretation and management for abnormal glucose metabolism.

Comparisons of Intradialytic Exercise Versus Home-Based Exercise in Hemodialysis Patients: A Narrative Review.

With the increasing prevalence of end-stage kidney disease, the number of patients requiring hemodialysis (HD) continues to rise. While life-sustaining, HD is often associated with adverse effects such as muscle loss, physical deconditioning, fatigue, and compromised health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recent research suggests that intradialytic exercise (IDE) and home-based exercise (HBE) may mitigate these adverse effects and improve patient outcomes. However, the existing literature mainly focuses on the outcomes of both exercises, whereas the comparison of types is often omitted. Hence, this review consolidates findings from studies investigating the effectiveness, implementation, safety, feasibility, and adherence of different types of IDE and HBE in HD patients. Overall, the current literature bolsters the significance of IDE and HBE for improving health in HD patients. IDE and HBE enhance physical function, cardiopulmonary capacity, HRQoL, and cognitive well-being. Some research proposed an indirect link between IDE and survival rates. Despite these benefits, challenges remain in implementing these exercise modalities, including patient adherence and the feasibility of routine exercise during HD sessions. Integrating these exercises into routine care allows healthcare providers to enhance outcomes for HD patients. Further research is suggested to optimize exercise protocols and explore long-term effects and cost-effectiveness.