The role of SSDL in quality assurance in radiotherapy.

This paper describes the role of the Polish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) in quality assurance in radiotherapy by means of providing calibration of ionisation chambers, TLD postal dosimetry audits and end-to-end audits for radiation therapy. A historical review of the methods and results are presented. The influence of the SSDL in Warsaw on radiation protection of patients in Poland is discussed. The International Atomic Energy Agency together with World Health Organisation (IAEA/WHO), through its network of SSDLs around the world, propagates newly developed methods for calibration and auditing. Suitable high quality equipment was provided by the IAEA, as well as special materials and technical support to the SSDL in Warsaw. The activity of the SSDL and the services provided for Polish radiotherapy centres have resulted in a reduction of discrepancies between planned doses and doses delivered to patients. The newly tested IAEA methods of end-to-end on-site dosimetry audits allow for monitoring and improving the quality of IMRT in Poland. The traceability of standards used for the calibration of therapy level dosimeters from Polish radiotherapy centres is assured by the IAEA dosimetry laboratory. The consistency of methods performed in the Polish SSDL with the ISO:17025 norm is supervised by the Polish Centre for Accreditation - a member of International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), for calibration and testing. Due to the rapid technological development of radiotherapy, special attention has to be paid to newly developed methods for dosimetry auditing and institutions which provide services for assuring radiation safety of patients.

Statistical analysis of the periodic intermediate checks results on the standards used for calibrations of ionizing radiation dosimeters in a 60Co gamma ray beam.

Periodic intermediate checks on the equipment used for calibration activity accredited for the conformity with the international norm ISO/IEC 17025 are an essential issue for monitoring the validity of calibration laboratory's results. These checks should be carried out according to a procedure defined by each accredited laboratory. The results of these checks should not exceed the acceptance criteria established in the laboratory and statistical techniques shall be applied to the reviewing of the results. In this work, a simple method of carrying out intermediate checks on working standards used for calibrations of ionizing radiation dosimeters in a 60Co gamma ray beam was presented. Moreover, the statistical analysis of obtained results was presented. This analysis allowed for a reliable inference regarding the operation of the working standards used to calibrate the customer's devices. The presented methods can be used as a guidance in order to conform to the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements for carrying out and reviewing of periodic intermediate checks results in the area of calibrations of ionizing radiation dosimeters for external beam radiotherapy.

Long-term stability of radiotherapy dosimeters calibrated at the Polish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory.

Unidos 10001, Unidos E (10008/10009) and Dose 1 electrometers from 14 radiotherapy centres were calibrated 3-4 times over a long period of time, together with Farmer type (PTW 30001, 30013, Nuclear Enterprises 2571 and Scanditronix-Wellhofer FC65G) cylindrical ionization chambers and plane-parallel type chambers (PTW Markus 23343 and Scanditronix-Wellhofer PPC05). On the basis of the long period of repetitive establishing of calibration coefficients for the same electrometers and ionization chambers, the accuracy of electrometers and the long-term stability of ionization chambers were examined. All measurements were carried out at the same laboratory, by the same staff, according to the same IAEA recommendations. A good accuracy and long-term stability of the dosimeters used in Polish radiotherapy centres was observed. These values were within 0.1% for electrometers and 0.2% for the chambers with electrometers. Furthermore, these values were not observed to vary over time. The observations confirm the opinion that the requirement of calibration of the dosimeters more often than every 2 years is not justified.