RESUMO
The success of CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has been partially offset by toxicity and logistical challenges, which off-the-shelf agents like CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies might potentially overcome. However, when using CAR T outcomes as the 'standard-of-care comparatorÌ for relapsed/refractory (r/r) LBCL, a potential learning curve with implementing a novel, complex therapy like CAR T needs to be considered. To address this, we analysed 726 UK patients intended to be treated with CD19 CAR T for r/r LBCL and compared outcomes between the first year of the national CAR T programme (Era 1; 2019) and the more recent treatment era (Era 2; 2020-2022). We identified significant improvements for Era 2 versus Era 1 in dropout rate (17% vs. 27%, p = 0.001), progression-free survival (1-year PFS 50% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (1-year OS 60% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). We also observed increased use of bridging therapy, improvement in bridging outcomes, more tocilizumab/corticosteroid use, reduced high-grade cytokine release syndrome (4% vs. 9%, p = 0.01) and intensive care unit admissions (20% vs. 32%, p = 0.001). Our results demonstrate significant improvement in CAR T outcomes over time, highlighting the importance of using up-to-date clinical data when comparing CAR T against new treatment options for r/r LBCL.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal , Antígenos CD19 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Radiotherapy (RT) has potential synergistic effects with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T but is not widely used as bridging therapy due to logistical challenges and lack of standardised protocols. We analysed RT bridging in a multicentre national cohort of large B-cell lymphoma patients approved for 3L axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel across 12 UK centres. Of 763 approved patients, 722 were leukapheresed, 717 had data available on bridging therapy. 169/717 (24%) received RT bridging, 129 as single modality and 40 as combined modality treatment (CMT). Of 169 patients, 65.7% had advanced stage, 36.9% bulky disease, 86.5% elevated LDH, 41.7% international prognostic index (IPI) ≥3 and 15.2% double/triple hit at the time of approval. Use of RT bridging varied from 11% to 32% between centres and increased over time. Vein-to-vein time and infusion rate did not differ between bridging modalities. RT-bridged patients had favourable outcomes with 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 56% for single modality and 47% for CMT (1-year PFS 43% for systemic bridging). This is the largest cohort of LBCL patients receiving RT bridging prior to CAR T reported to date. Our results show that RT bridging can be safely and effectively used even in advanced stage and high-risk disease, with low dropout rates and excellent outcomes.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reino Unido , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/radioterapia , Idoso , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Adulto , Antígenos CD19/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Produtos BiológicosRESUMO
Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients with comorbidities and/or advanced age are increasingly considered for treatment with CD19 CAR T, but data on the clinical benefit of CAR T in the less fit patient population are still limited. We analysed outcomes of consecutive patients approved for treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) by the UK National CAR T Clinical Panel, according to fitness for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). 81/404 (20%) of approved patients were deemed unfit for ASCT. Unfit patients were more likely to receive tisa-cel versus axi-cel (52% vs. 48%) compared to 20% versus 80% in ASCT-fit patients; p < 0.0001. The drop-out rate from approval to infusion was significantly higher in the ASCT-unfit group (34.6% vs. 23.5%; p = 0.042). Among infused patients, response rate, progression-free and overall survival were similar in both cohorts. CAR T was well-tolerated in ASCT-unfit patients with an incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of 2% and 11%, respectively. Results from this multicentre real-world cohort demonstrate that CD19 CAR T can be safely delivered in carefully selected older patients and patients with comorbidities who are not deemed suitable for transplant.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Transplantes , Humanos , Autoenxertos , Transplante Autólogo , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal , Antígenos CD19 , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Clinically latent myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) are important causes of what would otherwise be considered idiopathic hepatic (HVT) or portal vein thrombosis (PVT). They may be difficult to diagnose initially because the peripheral blood count may be normal at the time of thrombosis. A strong association between an activating mutation of the gene encoding one of the Janus kinase family of tyrosine kinases (JAK2(V617F)) and the Philadelphia chromosome-negative MPDs has been identified. We have studied 19 patients with unexplained HVT or PVT and tested for JAK2(V617F). Fourteen (74%) of the 19 patients were heterozygous for JAK2(V617F) but did not meet diagnostic criteria for a MPD at the time of presentation with thrombosis. Prolonged follow-up established the presence of an overt MPD in 13 of the 14 patients after a median duration of 38 months. We recommend testing for JAK2(V617F) in all patients with unexplained HVT or PVT, to identify latent MPDs and prevent potential complications.