Molecular profiling of gynecologic cancers for treatment and management of disease - demonstrating clinical significance using the AMP/ASCO/CAP guidelines for interpretation and reporting of somatic variants.

Molecular features of gynecologic cancers have been investigated in comprehensive studies, but correlation of these molecular signatures with clinical significance for precision medicine is yet to be established. Towards this end, we evaluated 95 gynecologic cancer cases submitted for testing using The JAX ActionSeq™ NGS panel. Molecular profiles were studied and compared to TCGA datasets to identify similarities and distinguishing features among subtypes. We identified 146 unique clinically significant variants (Tier I and II) across 45 of the 212 genes (21%), in 87% (83/95) of cases. TP53, PTEN, ARID1A, PIK3CA and ATM were the most commonly mutated genes; CCNE1 and ERBB2 amplifications were the most frequently detected copy-number alterations. PARP inhibitors were among the most commonly reported drug class with clinical trials, consistent with the frequency of DNA damage-response pathway mutations in our cohort. Overall, our study provides additional insight into the molecular profiles of gynecologic cancers, highlighting regulatory pathways involved, raising the potential implications for targeted therapeutic options currently available.

Molecular profiling of CNS tumors for the treatment and management of disease.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined more than 130 distinct central nervous system (CNS) tumor entities, of which glioblastoma is the most fatal primary brain tumor. However, the correlation of the molecular signatures of glioblastoma with clinical significance for precision medicine is not well-known. How, and to what extent these variants may affect clinical decision making remains uncertain. Here, we evaluate 48 glioblastomas submitted for testing using the JAX ActionSeq™ Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. We identified 131 clinically significant variants (Tier I and II) across 30 of the 212 genes (14%). TP53, EGFR, PTEN, IDH1 were the most commonly mutated genes; EGFR, CDK4 amplifications, and CDKN2A deletion were the most frequently detected copy-number alterations. CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors were among the most commonly reported drug class with FDA approved therapies and investigational therapies, which is consistent with the frequencies of these genes in our cohort. Overall, our study established the molecular profiles of glioblastoma based on the 2017 joint consensus guidelines by AMP/ASCO/CAP and provides the potential implications for targeted therapeutic options currently available.

Mutation Yield of a Custom 212-Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Solid Tumors: Clinical Experience of the First 260 Cases Tested Using the JAX ActionSeq™ Assay.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the positive yield rate of a custom 212-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, the JAX ActionSeq™ assay, used in molecular profiling of solid tumors for precision medicine. METHODS: We evaluated 261 cases tested over a 24-month period including cancers across 24 primary tissue types and report on the mutation yield in these cases. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 261 cases (13%) had no detectable clinically significant variants. In the remaining 228 cases (87%), we identified 550 clinically significant variants in 88 of the 212 genes, with four of fewer clinically significant variants being detected in 62 of 88 genes (70%). TP53 had the highest number of variants (125), followed by APC (47), KRAS (47), ARID1A (20), PIK3CA (20) and EGFR (18). There were 38 tier I and 512 tier II variants, with two genes having only a tier I variant, seven genes having both a tier I and tier II variant, and 79 genes having at least one tier II variant. Overall, the ActionSeq™ assay detected clinically significant variants in 42% of the genes included in the panel (88/212), 68% of which (60/88) were detected in more than one tumor type. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that of the genes with documented involvement in cancer, only a limited number are currently clinically significant from a therapeutic, diagnostic and/or prognostic perspective.

Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Taking Liquid Biopsy to the Clinic: Validation of the JAX PlasmaMonitorTM Assay.

The standard of care in oncology has been genomic profiling of tumor tissue biopsies for the treatment and management of disease, which can prove to be quite challenging in terms of cost, invasiveness of procedure, and potential risk for the patient. As the number of available drugs in oncology continues to increase, so too does the demand for technologies and testing applications that can identify genomic alterations targetable by these new therapies. Liquid biopsies that use a blood draw from the diseased patient may offset the many disadvantages of the invasive procedure. However, as with any new technology or finding in the clinical field, the clinical utility of an analytical test such as that of the liquid biopsy has to be established. Here, we review the clinical testing space for liquid biopsy offerings and elucidate the technical and regulatory considerations to develop such an assay, using our recently validated PlasmaMonitorTM test.

Genomic Profiling of Two Histologically Distinct Rare Urothelial Cancers in a Clinical Setting to Identify Potential Therapeutic Options for Treatment and Management of Disease.

Molecular profiling of urothelial cancers for therapeutic and prognostic potential has been very limited due to the absence of cancer-specific targeted therapies. We describe here 2 clinical cases with a histological diagnosis of an invasive sarcomatoid and a poorly differentiated carcinoma favoring urothelial with some neuroendocrine differentiation, two of the rarer types of urothelial cancers, which were evaluated for mutations in 212 genes for single-nucleotide variants and copy-number variants and 53 genes for fusions associated with solid tumors. In both cases, we identified variants in 2 genes, ARID1A and CDKN2A, indicative of the role of dysregulation of chromatin remodeling and cell cycle control as being common features of bladder cancer, consistent with the proposed model of tumorigenesis in these rare, highly aggressive pathological subtypes. The presence of a KRAS mutation in the poorly differentiated cancer and a TP53 mutation in the sarcomatoid tumor is indicative of a distinctive profile and adds a potential layer of molecular stratification to these rarer histological subtypes. We present a comparative analysis of the histological, clinical, and molecular profile of both cases and discuss the potential to delineate these tumors at the molecular level keeping in mind the possible therapeutic implications.