Impact of nocturnal fall in blood pressure on early cardiovascular changes in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a selected population of subjects with a recent diagnosis of hypertension whether a blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure is associated with more advanced cardiac and vascular damage. METHODS: One hundred and eleven recently diagnosed and never-treated patients with mild essential hypertension underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography. RESULTS: The 78 patients with normal (> 10%) night-time fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (dippers) were similar to the 33 patients with a small (< or = 10 %) fall (non-dippers) for age, sex, body surface area, smoking habit, clinic and 24-h blood pressure. There were no differences between dippers and non-dippers in left ventricular mass index (104 versus 105 g/m2), common carotid internal diameter (5.8 versus 5.9 mm), intima-media thickness (0.66 versus 0.64 mm) and carotid plaques prevalence (25 versus 29%). Furthermore, no differences were found in the correlation of daytime and night-time SBP and DBP with left ventricular mass and carotid wall thickness. When the 77 men and 34 women were analysed separately, similar results were obtained. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a blunted reduction in night-time blood pressure does not play a major role in the development of cardiovascular changes during the early phase of essential hypertension.

Blood pressure control in a hypertension hospital clinic.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < or = 140/90 mm Hg) in a representative sample of treated hypertensive patients followed in our hypertension clinic. Second, to assess in a subgroup of these patients: (a) the proportion of BP control with both clinic blood pressure (CBP < or =140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (< or =132/85 mm Hg) criteria, and (b) the prevalence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index, LVMI>125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre clinic during a period of 6 months and who had regularly been followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. BP was taken in the clinic by a doctor using a mercury sphygmomanometer with the participants seated. Seventy-four patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics to the entire population of participants underwent complete echocardiographic examination and 24 h ABP monitoring. RESULTS: During follow-up, 352 of the treated patients had clinic BP < or =140/90 mm Hg, 198< or =160/95 mm Hg and 150>160/95 mm Hg, indicating that BP control was satisfactory in 50.3%, borderline in 28.3% and unsatisfactory in 21.4% of the cases. In the subgroup of 74 patients, the proportion of individuals with satisfactory clinic BP control (CBP< or =140/90 mm Hg) was higher (50.0 versus 33.6%) than with satisfactory ABP control (daytime ABP values < or =132/85 mm Hg). LVH was found in 21 of the 74 patients (28.3%): 12 of them had unsatisfactory CBP control and 19 had unsatisfactory ABP control. LVMI did not correlate with CBP values but only with ABP values (mean 24 h systolic r = 0.47, diastolic r = 0.40, P<0.001; mean daytime systolic r = 0.45, mean daytime diastolic r = 0.39, P<0.001; mean night-time systolic r = 0.38, mean night-time diastolic r = 0.38, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension centre clinic have satisfactory CBP control in 50% of cases, but this rate seems to over-estimate the effective BP control during daily life. A large fraction of patients show persistence of LVH and this evidence of organ damage almost entirely concerns individuals with poor ABP control.

Lack of correlation between left ventricular mass and diameter of left coronary artery main trunk in hypertensive patients.

The study was designed to evaluate whether the increase in left ventricular (LV) mass in essential hypertensives (H) is associated with a proportional increase in diameter of the left coronary artery (LCA) trunk. Twenty-six hypertensives, 14 with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index [LVMI] > or =134 g/m2 in men and > or =110 g/m2 in women) and 12 without LVH, and 10 normotensive controls (C) underwent clinical laboratory and echocardiographic transthoracic examination. LV dimensions were measured according to the Penn convention and LV mass calculated by the formula of Devereux. The LCA main trunk was visualized by two-dimension short axis view at the level of the great vessels section, and the diameter measured as intima-intima distance at end-diastole. Hypertensives with and without LVH and C had similar age, sex, and body surface area distribution. LVMI was, by definition, significantly higher in H with LVH than in H without LVH and in C (144+/-21, 113+/-13, and 98+/-10 g/m2, P<.01), whereas the diameter of the LCA trunk was similar in all groups (0.48+/-0.1, 0.48, and 0.46 cm, respectively). There was no significant correlation between LVMI and LCA diameter in H (r = 0.21, P = not significant). The diameter of LCA trunk was significantly correlated only with BSA (r = 0.5, P<.01), LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters (r = 0.5 and r = 0.4, P<.05). Our data suggest that in H the increase in LVM is not associated with a concomitant increase of epicardial coronary artery diameter, and this finding may account in part for the impairment of coronary blood flow reserve in LVH.

[Changes in the treatment of cardiac emergencies and their influence on fatalities. Data from the MONICA Project, Brianza Area]. / Mutamenti nel trattamento della emergenza cardiologica e loro influenza sulla letalità. Dati del Progetto MONICA Area Brianza.

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, clinical trials consistently modified the therapeutic approach to coronary disease, and particularly to acute myocardial infarction. However, the magnitude of the contribution to the observed reduction in case fatality rates due the therapeutic improvement is still being debated. OBJECTIVES: To determine the real degree of implementation of the "suggested treatments" on clinical practice, and to evaluate their global effect on coronary mortality. METHODS: Analysis of the type of administered treatment in two consecutive series of acute coronary events, observed during the year 1986 (500 events) and 1989 (907 events), registered by the MONICA Project-Brianza Area. We evaluated: pre-coronary times; type of hospitalization; type of treatment before, during and after the event; occurrence of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation both in and out of hospital; global and specific fatality rates at 28 days. RESULTS: In the study period, overall coronary fatality rates changed from 29.4 to 23.6% (19% decrease-p < 0.05), fatality of confirmed AMI changed from 16.4 to 8.3% (49.4% decrease-p < 0.005); specific fatality for out of hospital cardiac arrest was unchanged (99%). Pre-coronary times were unmodified in the two periods of observation: hospitalization < 1 hr. in 20%, < 6 hr. in 50%, > 24 hr. in 10% of events. The percentage of cases admitted in CCU changed from 47.4 to 54.8% (from 71.6 to 86.4% of patients with confirmed AMI-p < 0.025). Thrombolysis in confirmed AMI changed from 29.3 to 43.2% (p < 0.001); antiplatelets treatment changed from 19.7 to 81.9% (p < 0.001); the use of betablockers went from 16.6 to 44% (p < 0.001) while the use of other agents was unmodified. Coronary arteriography and revascularization procedures continue to play a marginal role. CONCLUSIONS: The MONICA registry experience shows that very important changes occurred in the treatment of coronary emergencies, particularly in the acute phase of myocardial infarction, suggesting that in our area, standardization of the therapeutic protocols might be responsible for the observed reduction of coronary fatality even though the advantages were observed only in hospitalized patients.

[Appropriateness of indicating aortocoronary bypass and coronary angioplasty: results of an observational prospective study in the Lombardy region. Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Appropriatezza Rivascolarizzazione Coronarica]. / L'appropriatezza della indicazione al by-pass aorto-coronarico e alla angioplastica coronarica: i risultati di uno studio osservazionale prospettico in regione Lombardia. Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Appropriatezza Rivascolarizzazion Coronarica.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies on the appropriateness of cardiac revascularization procedures have been aimed at detecting "overuse" (ie when patients get a procedure without a clear indication), while little attention has been paid yet to "underuse" (when patients who could benefit from a procedure do not get it). This study was planned to assess the extent of over- and underuse of revascularization procedures in northern Italy. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of experts convened by the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) rated the appropriateness of 898 "theoretical indications" for coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) using the RAND Corporation methodology. Standardized information has been collected on a consecutive sample of patients in the Lombardy region and identified during performance of a coronary angiogram at one of the services belonging to the GISE (Gruppo Italiano Studi Emodinamica) network. Out of the 2718 consecutive patients undergoing a coronary angiogram during the recruitment period (February-May 1995), a total of 1821 (70%) were eligible for the appropriateness study. RESULTS: Indication for CABG were appropriate in 565 (80%) patients, uncertain in 111 (16%) and inappropriate in 25 (4%). Corresponding values for PTCA were: 40% (n = 262), 46% (n = 300) and 14% (n = 90). Among the 394 to whom a medical therapy was recommended after angiography, the indication was considered appropriated in only 14% (n = 57) and uncertain for 30% (n = 117). For the remaining 220, the indication was considered inappropriate, suggesting that according to the panel criteria, 56% of the patients should have received a revascularization procedure (either a CABG or PTCA) instead. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that underuse of revascularization procedures represents a substantial health care problem in Lombardy region, at least with reference to the period covered by this study. The study in itself does not make it possible to understand whether these results reflect a structural shortage of services (limited accessibility and/or unprioritized waiting lists) or a more general quality-of-care problem. The study protocol now foresees a follow-up for 9 months after the index angiogram to assess the eventual utilization pattern of CABG/PTCA.

The consequences of under-use of coronary revascularization; results of a cohort study in Northern Italy.

AIM: To assess whether under-use of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) affects patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed following up a cohort of patients, candidates for a revascularization procedure (either CABG or PTCA) after an index angiogram. A total of 1258 patients, candidates -- according to explicit criteria -- for either CABG or PTCA entered the study enrolled by 16 hospitals located in a Northern Italian region (Lombardia). Information on demographic and clinical characteristics, type of care received (i.e. CABG or PTCA performed Yes/No) and vital status was obtained from revascularization laboratories, patients' hospital medical records and local census offices of the town of patients' residence. The main outcome measure was total unadjusted and adjusted mortality at a minimum follow-up of 9 months after the index cardiac angiogram. RESULTS: Patients who received CABG or PTCA (n=863) had lower mortality than those who did not (n=350) (4.8% vs 10.6%, P=0.001). This held true after adjustment for relevant risk factors between the two groups such as extent of coronary artery disease, clinical symptoms, and cardiac surgical risk index (adjusted odds ratio=0.48; 95% confidence intervals=0.30--0.77) and after performing a survival analysis (adjusted hazard ratio=0.31; 95% confidence intervals=0.19--0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Failure to perform a revascularization procedure when it was indicated led, in this study, to a significantly increased mortality showing that under-use of effective procedures may represent a significant quality of care problem even in areas where health care systems are well developed. Although the study was not specifically designed to identify determinants of under-use (i.e. reduced capacity leading to waiting lists, physicians' competence or patients' refusal to undergo a recommended procedure) our data suggest that limited capacity could have been the most important reason. Our findings also provide further evidence of the validity of the RAND method to assess the impact of under-use of coronary revascularization procedures.