Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 164(6): 1675-1684, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35066681

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insular cavernous malformations (iCMs) are very rare vascular lesions. Their surgical management is challenging, due to their complex functional and vascular relationship. The continuous improvement of intra-operative tools and neuroimaging techniques has progressively enhanced the safety of iCM surgery. Nevertheless, the best surgical approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the potential role of an anatomo-functional classification to guide the iCMs' management. METHODS: The study included patients affected by iCMs and referred to the Senior Author (FA). All cases were divided in 2 groups, according to a mainly pial growth pattern (exophytic group) or a subcortical one (endophytic group). Endophytic iCM was further subdivided in 3 subgroups, based on the insular gyri involved. According to this classification, each patient underwent a specific additional neuroimaging investigation and surgical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. In the surgical group, trans-sylvian (TS) approach was used in 6 patients with exophytic or Zone I endophytic iCMs. The transcortical (TC) approach with awake monitoring was used in 6 cases of Zone II endophytic vascular lesions. Both TS and trans-intraparietal sulcal (TIS) approach were used for 3 cases of Zone III endophytic iCM. At follow-up, 3 patients were fully recovered from a transient speech impairment while a permanent morbidity was observed in one case. CONCLUSIONS: ICMs represent a single entity with peculiar clinical and surgical aspects. The proposed iCM classification focuses on anatomical and functional concerns, aiming to suggest the best pre-operative work-up and the surgical evaluation.


Assuntos
Vigília , Humanos
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 157(4): 711-20, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25646850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a technique used worldwide to treat several types of chronic neuropathic pain refractory to any conservative treatment. The aim of this data collection is to enforce evidence of SCS effectiveness on neuropathic chronic pain reported in the literature and to speculate on the usefulness of the trial period in determining the long-term efficacy. Moreover, the very low percentage of undesired side effects and complications reported in our case series suggests that all implants should be performed by similarly well-trained and experienced professionals. METHOD: A multicentric data collection on a common database from 11 Italian neurosurgical departments started 3 years ago. Two different types of electrodes (paddle or percutaneous leads) were used. Of 122 patients, 73 % (N = 89) were submitted to a trial period, while the remaining patients underwent the immediate permanent implant (N = 33). Statistical comparisons of continuous variables between groups were performed. RESULTS: Most of the patients (80 %) had predominant pain to their lower limbs, while only 17 % of patients had prevalent axial pain. Significant reduction in pain, as measured by variation in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, was observed at least 1 year after implantation in 63.8 % of the cases, 59.5 % of patients who underwent a test trial and 71.4 % of patients who underwent permanent implant at once. No statistical differences were found between the lower-limb pain group and the axial pain group. CONCLUSIONS: No relevant differences in long-term outcomes were observed in previously tested patients compared with patients implanted at once. Through this analysis we hope to recruit new centres, to give more scientific value to our results.


Assuntos
Espaço Epidural/fisiologia , Neuralgia/terapia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Coleta de Dados , Espaço Epidural/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/cirurgia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/efeitos adversos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/normas , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med ; 5(9): 000947, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30756068

RESUMO

Oral anticoagulant therapy is recommended for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and to prevent stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Until a few years ago, vitamin K antagonists were the only drugs available, but direct oral anticoagulants have recently been introduced into clinical practice for the same clinical indications. Unlike the situation with VKAs, fixed-dose administration was proposed for DOACs, without the necessity for routine laboratory monitoring. However, in clinical practice a high inter-variability in DOAC plasma levels, independently of the type of drug and patient characteristics, was observed and the importance of measuring DOAC anticoagulant activity to support treatment decisions has therefore been recognized. We describe two clinical cases in order to highlight the role and importance of dabigatran-specific measurements to guide patient management in case of major complications. LEARNING POINT: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in clinical practice at fixed doses without laboratory monitoring.However, the importance of measuring DOAC anticoagulant activity to support treatment decisions, particularly in emergency conditions, has been recognized.The clinical value of DOAC measurement is highlighted in the two described cases where the anticoagulation level was taken into consideration when deciding on treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA