Clinical effects of viral relapse after interferon plus ribavirin in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sustained viral response (SVR) after therapy with interferon-ribavirin (IF-RB) reduces liver-related (LR) complications and mortality in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients. Here, we assess the impact of end-of-treatment response with subsequent relapse (REL) on LR events (LR death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver transplantation), and liver stiffness (LS) by transient elastography. METHODS: We analyzed the GESIDA 3603 Cohort (HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with IF-RB in 19 centers in Spain). Response to IF-RB was categorized as SVR, REL, and no response (NR). The study started when IF-RB was stopped and ended at death or the last follow-up visit. Multivariate regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, HIV category of transmission, CDC clinical category, nadir CD4+ cell count, HCV genotype, HCV-RNA viral load, and liver fibrosis. RESULTS: Of 1599 patients included, response was categorized as NR in 765, REL in 250 and SVR in 584. Median follow-up was more than 4 years in each group. Taking the group of patients with NR as reference, we found that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of liver-related events (liver-related death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation) for patients with REL and for patients with SVR were 0.17 (0.05; 0.50) and 0.03 (0; 0.20), respectively. We also found that SVR was followed by less liver stiffness than both REL and NR. However, REL was associated with less liver stiffness than NR. CONCLUSIONS: Best outcomes were achieved with an SVR. However, REL was associated with less LR mortality, decompensation, and liver stiffness than NR.

Validation of N Protein Antibodies to Diagnose Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Large Cohort of Healthcare Workers: Use of Roche Elecsys® Immunoassay in the S Protein Vaccination Era.

The aim of this study was to validate the detection of anti-nucleocapsid protein (N protein) antibodies for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in light of the fact that most COVID-19 vaccines use the spike (S) protein as the antigen. Here, 3550 healthcare workers (HCWs) were enrolled from May 2020 (when no S protein vaccines were available). We defined SARS-CoV-2 infection if HCWs were found to be positive by RT-PCR or found to be positive in at least two different serological immunoassays. Serum samples from Biobanc I3PT-CERCA were analyzed by Roche Elecsys® (N protein) and Vircell IgG (N and S proteins) immunoassays. Discordant samples were reanalyzed with other commercial immunoassays. Roche Elecsys® showed the positivity of 539 (15.2%) HCWs, 664 (18.7%) were found to be positive by Vircell IgG immunoassays, and 164 samples (4.6%) showed discrepant results. According to our SARS-CoV-2 infection criteria, 563 HCWs had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Roche Elecsys® immunoassay has a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and concordance with the presence of infection of 94.7%, 99.8%, 99.3%, and 0.96, respectively. Similar results were observed in a validation cohort of vaccinated HCWs. We conclude that the Roche Elecsys® SARS-CoV-2 N protein immunoassay demonstrated good performance in diagnosing previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large cohort of HCWs.

Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces non-liver-related mortality in patients coinfected with HIV and Hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: Sustained virological response (SVR) after therapy with interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver-related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assessed the effect of SVR on HIV progression and mortality not related to liver disease. METHODS: An observational cohort study including consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with interferon plus ribavirin between 2000 and 2008 in 19 centers in Spain. RESULTS: Of 1599 patients, 626 (39%) had an SVR. After a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, we confirmed that failure to achieve an SVR was associated with an increased risk of liver-related events and liver-related death. We also observed higher rates of the following events in nonresponders than in responders: AIDS-defining conditions (rate per 100 person years, 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), .59-1.10] vs 0.29 [.10-.48]; P= .003), non-liver-related deaths (0.65 [.42-.87] vs 0.16 [.02-.30]; P = .002), and non-liver-related, non-AIDS-related deaths (0.55 [.34-.75] vs 0.16 [.02-.30]; P = .002). Cox regression analysis showed that the adjusted hazard ratios of new AIDS-defining conditions, non-liver-related deaths, and non-liver-related, non-AIDS-related deaths for nonresponders compared with responders were 1.90 (95% CI, .89-4.10; P = .095), 3.19 (1.21-8.40; P = .019), and 2.85 (1.07-7.60; P = .036), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that eradication of HCV after therapy with interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is associated not only with a reduction in liver-related events but also with a reduction in HIV progression and mortality not related to liver disease.

Dual therapy based on a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor as a novel salvage strategy for HIV-1-infected patients on a failing antiretroviral regimen.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of dual-antiretroviral therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) in treatment-experienced patients failing a current antiretroviral regimen. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 60 consecutive HIV-1-infected patients who started a dual-antiretroviral rescue regimen containing a PI/r, in three hospitals in Spain. Virological failure was defined as confirmed HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at treatment week 24 or later. The percentage of patients remaining free of therapeutic failure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, by intent-to-treat analysis (missing, changes and virological failure = therapeutic failure). RESULTS: Median baseline characteristics of patients were: 13 years on antiretroviral therapy (four prior highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens and eight different drugs), 380 CD4 cells/mm(3) and HIV RNA 3.04 log(10) copies/mL. All patients had resistance mutations to at least two drug classes, although only 9.3% had specific mutations to darunavir. A darunavir-based regimen was started in 47 (78.4%) patients, combined with etravirine (26.7%), tenofovir (26.7%) or raltegravir (25%). Three (5%) patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. At the end of follow-up, 86.7% of patients remained free of therapeutic failure; the percentages of patients with no therapeutic failure at treatment weeks 24, 48 and 96 were 96.6% (95% CI, 91.9-101.3); 90.1% (95% CI, 81.9-98.3) and 79.8% (95% CI, 66.1-93.5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a dual-therapy rescue regimen including a PI/r is convenient, well tolerated and potent enough to achieve persistent viral suppression in selected pre-treated patients with low viral load and few PI resistance mutations.

Simplification to dual antiretroviral therapy including a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of simplification to a dual antiretroviral regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 131 HIV-1-infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral treatment (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL) who switched to a maintenance dual antiretroviral regimen, containing a PI/r, in three hospitals in Spain. Virological failure was defined as confirmed HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL. The percentage of patients remaining free of therapeutic failure was estimated using the time-to-loss-of-therapeutic-response algorithm, by intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Median baseline characteristics of the patients were 14 years on antiretroviral therapy, five prior HAART regimens and 10 different drugs, 24 months on a suppressive regimen and 522 CD4+ cells/mL. Reasons for simplification to dual therapy were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-related toxicity (46.6%), removal of lamivudine/emtricitabine due to resistance (16.8%), simplification from regimens containing a dual PI, enfuvirtide or tipranavir (20.6%) and simplification from other complex regimens (16.0%). Darunavir (58.0%), lopinavir (16.8%) or atazanavir (13.0%) were the preferred PIs, used in combination with tenofovir (50.4%), raltegravir (22.1%) or etravirine (12.2%). At the end of follow-up (median 14 months), 90.1% of patients remained free of therapeutic failure; corresponding data at treatment weeks 24, 48 and 96 were 93.6% (95% CI, 89.3-97.9), 90.9% (95% CI, 84.9-95.9) and 87.4% (95% CI, 80.7-94.1), respectively. Two (1.5%) patients had virological failure and 11 (8.4%) discontinued treatment due to side effects or were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Simplification to a dual-therapy regimen including a PI/r might be useful to enhance convenience and/or diminish toxicity in selected treatment-experienced patients.

Antibody Response Induced by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers.

The aim of this study was to characterize the antibody response induced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of healthcare workers. A total of 2247 serum samples were analyzed using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-test (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), arterial hypertension, smoking and time between infection and/or vaccination and serology were considered the confounding factors. Regarding the medians, subjects previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 who preserved their response to the nucleocapsid (N) protein showed higher humoral immunogenicity (BNT162b2: 6456.0 U/mL median; mRNA-1273: 2505.0 U/mL) compared with non-infected (BNT162b2: 867.0 U/mL; mRNA-1273: 2300.5 U/mL) and infected subjects with a lost response to N protein (BNT162b2: 2992.0 U/mL). After controlling for the confounders, a higher response was still observed for mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 in uninfected individuals (FC = 2.35, p < 0.0001) but not in previously infected subjects (1.11 FC, p = 0.1862). The lowest levels of antibodies were detected in previously infected non-vaccinated individuals (39.4 U/mL). Clinical variables previously linked to poor prognoses regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as age, BMI and arterial hypertension, were positively associated with increasing levels of anti-S protein antibody exclusively in infected subjects. The mRNA-1273 vaccine generated a higher antibody response to the S protein than BNT162b2 in non-infected subjects only.

Response-guided therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients coinfected with HIV: a pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: To study the feasibility of a response-guided therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Treatment duration was individualized on the basis of week 4 and week 12 virologic response. Sixty patients were enrolled and received pegylated interferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg per week) plus weight-based ribavirin (800-1400 mg/day). Patients who achieved a rapid virologic response, defined as viral load <50 IU/mL at treatment week 4, completed 24 weeks of therapy. Patients who did not achieve a rapid virologic response were reassessed at treatment week 12. Patients with a complete early virologic response, defined as an HCV RNA level <600 IU/mL, were treated for 48 weeks. Patients with a partial response, defined as a decrease in the viral load > or = 2 log10 and an HCV RNA level > or = 600 IU/mL, who attained an undetectable viral load at week 24 were treated for 60 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response, defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL, 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 33 (55%) of 60 patients achieved a sustained virologic response: 11 (44%) of 25 patients with HCV genotype 1, 3 (27%) of 11 patients with genotype 4, and 19 (79%) of 24 patients with genotype 3. One-third of patients showed a rapid virologic response. Of patients with genotype 1, there was a rapid virologic response in 4 (16%) of 25; with genotype 4, in 1 (9%) of 11; and with genotype 3, in 14 (58%) of 24. Of the 19 patients with a rapid virologic response, 17 (89.5%) eradicated the virus after 24 weeks of therapy. The rate of sustained virologic response was significantly higher among patients with genotype 3 and low pretreatment HCV RNA levels. A high relapse rate (46%) after 48 weeks of therapy occurred among patients infected with genotypes 1 or 4 who first achieved undetectable viral load at treatment week 12. CONCLUSION: A response-guide therapy is feasible and may be useful to optimize the individual outcome of HCV treatment in patients coinfected with HIV.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin for retreatment of chronic HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients failing a previous standard interferon-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: Combination of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin is the standard treatment for HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients. However, data available on the efficacy of this therapy in co-infected patients who failed a former interferon-based regimen are limited. METHODS: We analysed the efficacy and safety of the Peg-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin combination in a multicentre observational cohort study including 54 HCV/HIV co-infected patients who had failed to respond to or relapsed on interferon-based treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL 24 weeks after completion of therapy. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat analysis, 30% of the patients achieved an SVR. Viral eradication by genotype was 18.9% (7/37) genotype 1; 57.1% (8/14) genotype 3 and 33.3% (1/3) genotype 4. The only independent predictor of SVR was genotype 3 (odds ratio: 5.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-19.8). Fourteen (38%) patients with genotype 1 had undetectable viral load at week 48 of treatment. Nevertheless, 50% of them relapsed during the follow-up period. Severe adverse events or progression of HIV infection did not occur during the study; however, 39% of the patients required Peg-IFN dose reduction because of intolerance or haematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combined Peg-IFN and ribavirin achieved a substantial rate of SVR in HCV/HIV co-infected patients who failed a prior standard interferon-based regimen. The decision to retreat any co-infected patient should be individual-based. More aggressive strategies may be necessary to avoid the high relapse rate observed among patients with genotype 1.

Telaprevir decreases estimated glomerular filtration rate in HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfected patients.

We investigated kidney function outcome in 24 chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients coinfected with HIV receiving telaprevir in a single tertiary care hospital in Spain. A statistically significant median (interquartile range) decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m) relative to baseline [93.6 (73.0-109.0)] was seen at weeks 4 [86.5 (34.0-112.0), P = 0.014], 8 [90.0 (49.0-111.0), P = 0.026] and 12 [89.5 (54.0-113.0), P = 0.017]. These changes reversed after telaprevir discontinuation. Patients presenting an eGFR decrease had a higher risk of haematological toxicity.

Switch strategies in antiretroviral therapy regimens.

Despite great advances in antiretroviral therapy in the last decade, several limitations still remain such as adverse effects, lack of adherence and drug-drug interactions. Switching antiretroviral therapy in stable, virologically suppressed patients with the aim of improving tolerability and convenience is an expanding strategy in clinical practice. Several factors need to be taken into consideration when switching a suppressive regimen, such as previous virologic failure, genetic barrier of the new regimen, prior duration of virologic suppression and expected level of adherence. The most frequently used strategies include reductions in the number of pills, drugs or doses. Although switching strategies may be useful, not all the regimens used in clinical practice are based on data from randomized clinical trials and some may not be the best option for certain patients; therefore, therapy should be individualized taking into consideration available information as well as patient and drug characteristics.

ACTG-HIV symptoms changes in patients switched to RPV/FTC/TDF due to previous intolerance to CART. Interim analysis of the PRO-STR study.

INTRODUCTION: Tolerability and convenience are crucial aspects for the long-term success of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact in routine clinical practice of switching to the single tablet regimen (STR) RPV/FTC/TDF in patients with intolerance to previous cART, in terms of patients' well-being, assessed by several validated measures. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study. Adult HIV-infected patients with viral load under 1.000 copies/mL while receiving a stable ART for at least the last three months and switched to RPV/FTC/TDF due to intolerance of previous regimen, were included. Analyses were performed by ITT. Presence/magnitude of symptoms (ACTG-HIV Symptom Index), quality of life (EQ-5D, EUROQoL & MOS-HIV), adherence (SMAQ), preference of treatment and perceived ease of medication (ESTAR) through 48 weeks were performed. RESULTS: Interim analysis of 125 patients with 16 weeks of follow up was performed. 100 (80%) were male, mean age 46 years. Mean CD4 at baseline was 629.5±307.29 and 123 (98.4%) had viral load <50 copies/mL; 15% were HCV co-infected. Ninety two (73.6%) patients switched from a NNRTI (84.8% from EFV/FTC/TDF) and 33 (26.4%) from a PI/r. The most frequent reasons for switching were psychiatric disorders (51.2%), CNS adverse events (40.8%), gastrointestinal (19.2%) and metabolic disorders (19.2%). At the time of this analysis (week 16), four patients (3.2%) discontinued treatment: one due to adverse events, two virologic failures and one with no data. A total of 104 patients (83.2%) were virologically suppressed (<50 copies/mL). The average degree of discomfort in the ACTG-HIV Symptom Index significantly decreased from baseline (21±15.55) to week 4 (10.89±12.36) & week 16 (10.81±12.62), p<0.001. In all the patients, quality of life tools showed a significant benefit in well-being of the patients (Table 1). Adherence to therapy significantly and progressively increased (SMAQ) from baseline (54.4%) to week 4 (68%), p<0.001 and to week 16 (72.0%), p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to RPV/FTC/TDF from another ARV regimen due to toxicity, significantly improved the quality of life of HIV-infected patients, both in mental and physical components, and improved adherence to therapy while maintaining a good immune and virological response.

Tropical diseases screening in immigrant patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in Spain.

Latent parasitic infections can reactivate because of immunosuppression. We conducted a prospective observational study of all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected immigrants who visited the Infectious Diseases Department of the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, during June 2010-May 2011. Screening of the most prevalent tropical diseases (intestinal parasitosis, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, malaria, schistosomiasis, and strongyloidiasis) was performed according to geographic origin. A total of 190 patients were included: 141 (74.2%) from Latin America, 41 (21.6%) from sub-Saharan Africa, and 8 (4.2%) from northern Africa. Overall, 36.8% (70 of 190) of the patients had at least one positive result for any parasitic disease: 5 patients with positive Trypanosoma cruzi serology, 11 patients with positive Schistosoma mansoni serology, 35 patients with positive Strongyloides stercoralis serology, 7 patients with positive Leishmania infantum serology, intestinal parasitosis were detected in 37 patients, malaria was diagnosed in one symptomatic patient. We propose a screening and management strategy of latent parasitic infections in immigrant patients infected with HIV.

Invasive pneumococcal disease in HIV-infected adults: clinical changes after the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist on the implications of widespread use of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children in the invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in HIV-infected adults. We conducted a multicenter study to analyze differences in clinical presentation of IPD between HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected adults in the prevaccine and postvaccine era. METHODS: Study of all cases of IPD in HIV-infected adults diagnosed since 1996 to 2010. Episodes were classified into prevaccine (1996-2001), early postvaccine (2002-2004), and late postvaccine period (2005-2010). For each case, we identified an HIV-negative control patient with IPD matched by hospital, age, and vaccine period. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one episodes of IPD in HIV-infected patients were diagnosed. The incidence of IPD decreased from 7.81 to 3.69 episodes per 1000 patient-years (-53%; 95% confidence interval: -65% to -36%, P < 0.001) between prevaccine and late postvaccine period. There was an 81% (95% confidence interval: -88% to -69%, P < 0.001) decrease of IPD caused by vaccine serotypes. In late postvaccine period IPD in HIV-infected patients was associated to higher rates of respiratory failure (28.4% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.011), greater intensive care unit admission (8.2% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.02) and a higher need for mechanical ventilation (5.9% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.033). In the prevaccine period, non-HIV-infected patients had a more severe illness than in those with HIV infection; however, these differences disappeared in the late postvaccine period. CONCLUSIONS: In the late postvaccine era, the incidence of IPD in HIV-infected patients has decreased, however, clinical presentation seems to have changed to a more severe illness. The widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, polyssacharide vaccine, and 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has contributed to these changes.

Abacavir coadministration does not interfere with the suppressive activity of ribavirin in an HCV replicon system.

BACKGROUND: HCV is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-coinfected patients. Several observational studies have suggested that HCV response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin is lower in HIV-coinfected patients treated with abacavir. It has been postulated that abacavir could compete with ribavirin to be phosphorylated, leading to a reduction in the active form of the drug (triphosphorylated ribavirin). Here, we studied the effect of abacavir, tenofovir or lamivudine addition on the suppressive activity of ribavirin in an HCV RNA replicon system. METHODS: We used the human hepatoma HuH-7 cell clone 9B containing the HCV genotype 1b replicon I389/NS3-3'. Cells were treated for 24 h with ribavirin (0, 10 and 50 µM) plus abacavir, tenofovir or lamivudine at doses of 0, 10 and 50 µM and HCV RNA production was quantified by real-time PCR in triplicate assays. Results were expressed as mean±SD of the HCV RNA produced per cell (log(10) IU/cell). Means were compared using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: Ribavirin treatment produced a dose-dependent suppression of HCV RNA production by the replicon system. Combination of ribavirin and interferon resulted in an additive antiviral activity. The addition of abacavir did not modify the suppressive activity of ribavirin on the replicon HCV RNA expression. Similar results were obtained when ribavirin was used in combination with tenofovir or lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: In a subgenomic HCV RNA replicon system, the antiviral effect of ribavirin was not modified by the addition of abacavir, tenofovir or lamivudine.

Ability of treatment week 12 viral response to predict long-term outcome in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommendation to extend treatment duration in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients who clear the virus later than treatment week 4 is not evidence-based. Our main objective was to study the ability of week 12 viral response [early virologic response (EVR)] to predict long-term outcome in patients treated for 48 weeks. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: Genotype 1 HCV treatment-naive, HIV-coinfected adult patients with compensated liver disease who started combination therapy with fixed-dose pegylated-interferon (pegIFN) alfa-2a or weight-based pegIFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin were included. Univariate and forward stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to identify predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) and relapse. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat analysis, 31.3% (87/278) of patients achieved an SVR. SVR rate was more than three-fold higher in patients who cleared the virus by week 12 of treatment compared with late responders. Among 123 end-of-treatment responders, 36 (29.3%) relapsed. Relapse risk increased in patients with cirrhosis, in those with ribavirin dose reductions and in late responders: more than 65% of patients who cleared the virus between weeks 12 and 24 relapsed following 48 weeks of treatment compared with 10% of those attaining a complete EVR (<15 IU/ml) at treatment week 12 (risk ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 2.9-14.4). CONCLUSION: Viral response at treatment week 12 is a strong predictor of long-term outcome. Genotype 1 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who achieve a complete EVR (<15 IU/ml) are at low risk of viral relapse after completing the standard 48 weeks of therapy.