Efficacy of vancomycin lock therapy for totally implantable venous access port-related infection due to coagulase-negative staphylococci in 100 patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Data on the efficacy of vancomycin catheter lock therapy (VLT) for conservative treatment of totally implantable venous access port-related infections (TIVAP-RI) due to CoNS are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VLT in the treatment of TIVAP-RI due to CoNS in cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective, observational, multicentre study included adults with cancer treated with VLT for a TIVAP-RI due to CoNS. The primary endpoint was the success of VLT, defined as no TIVAP removal nor TIVAP-RI recurrence within 3 months after initiation of VLT. The secondary endpoint was 3 month mortality. Risk factors for VLT failure were also analysed. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included [men 53%, median age 63 years (IQR 53-72)]. Median duration of VLT was 12 days (IQR 9-14). Systemic antibiotic therapy was administered in 87 patients. VLT was successful in 44 patients. TIVAP could be reused after VLT in 51 patients. Recurrence of infection after completion of VLT occurred in 33 patients, among which TIVAP was removed in 27. Intermittent VLT (antibiotic solution left in place in the TIVAP lumen part of the time) was identified as a risk factor for TIVAP-RI recurrence. At 3 months, 26 deaths were reported; 1 (4%) was related to TIVAP-RI. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 months, success of VLT for TIVAP-RI due to CoNS was low. However, removing TIVAP was avoided in nearly half the patients. Continuous locks should be preferred to intermittent locks. Identifying factors of success is essential to select patients who may benefit from VLT.

Establishment of a French surveillance system of Clostridiodes difficile infection: Comparison of patient's characteristics with other national and European data.

INTRODUCTION: The magnitude and scope of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has changed with an increase in incidence and severity. The epidemiology of CDI is not well known in France due to difficulties to conduct large continuous surveillance. The objectives were to compare the characteristics of patients with CDI collected through repeated point prevalence survey via DIFTEC™, a free electronic tool, with those from previous French or European studies. METHODS: DIFTEC™ was developed to evaluate epidemiological burden, diagnostic strategies and management of CDI in France. National and European guidelines were used for definitions. A literature review of studies conducted in Western Europe on CDI and published between January 2008 and May 2018 was done to compare their data with those included in the DIFTEC™ database. RESULTS: From January 2016, to December 2017, 455 CDI episodes from 22 French hospitals were included. Most of CDI cases were health-care associated (HCA) (78%). The comparison between included patients and French literature data showed that the rates of previous antibiotics exposure, crude mortality and recurrence were not statistically different. However HCA-CDI was significantly more frequent in the DIFTEC™ study. Gender distribution, recurrence and crude mortality rates were not statistically different compared to European data. HCA-CDI was more frequent in the DIFTEC™ study whereas previous treatment with proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics were significantly higher in European studies. DISCUSSION: These results illustrated the added value of a new tool for increasing the reliable knowledge of CDI in France based on epidemiological surveillance implemented in health-care settings.

[COVID-19 and patients with cancer: Experiment of a French comprehensive cancer center]. / Première vague COVID-19 : expérience d'un centre de lutte contre le cancer.

The emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused profound upset in health systems around the world. As cancer patients seem to be at greater risk, the organization of oncological care had to be adapted. We first report the progress of the "first wave" of COVID-19 at the Institut Curie, a French comprehensive cancer center, by describing the measures implemented to limit the risk of transmission of COVID-19 while ensuring as much as possible the continuation of anticancer treatments. Then, we present the results of a prospective institutional database in which the characteristics and outcome of our patients with cancer and suffering from COVID-19 were collected. From March 13 to April 25, 2020, 141 patients followed at Institut Curie for cancer developed COVID-19, of which 26 (18%) died from it. The minimum incidence of COVID-19 in Institut Curie is estimated at 1.4% over this period. No risk factors for developing a severe form of COVID-19 related to cancer have been identified. Cancer patients do not appear to be at greater risk of developing COVID-19, nor of having a more severe form than the general population. With the current increase of COVID-19 cases, it seems essential to share the experience already acquired to minimize the impact of this crisis on the long-term outcome of patients followed for cancer.

Characteristics and Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have emerged about the higher risk of fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in cancer patients. In this article, we review the experience of a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A prospective registry was set up at Institut Curie at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. All cancer patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 were entered and actively followed for 28 days. RESULTS: Among 9842 patients treated at Institut Curie between March 13 and May 1, 2020, 141 (1.4%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, based on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing and/or computerized tomography scan. In line with our case mix, breast cancer (40.4%) was the most common tumor type, followed by hematological and lung malignancies. Patients with active cancer therapy or/and advanced cancer accounted for 87.9% and 68.9% of patients, respectively. At diagnosis, 78.7% of patients had COVID-19-related symptoms, with an extent of lung parenchyma involvement inferior to 50% in 95.8% of patients. Blood count variations and C-reactive protein elevation were the most common laboratory abnormalities. Antibiotics and antiviral agents were administered in 48.2% and 6.4% of patients, respectively. At the time of analysis, 26 patients (18.4%) have died from COVID-19, and 100 (70.9%) were cured. Independent prognostic factors at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with death or intensive care unit admission were extent of COVID-19 pneumonia and decreased O2 saturation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 incidence and presentation in cancer patients appear to be very similar to those in the general population. The outcome of COVID-19 is primarily driven by the initial severity of infection rather than patient or cancer characteristics.

Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection in a hepatology ward.

During 2001, Clostridium difficile infection was observed in 23 patients hospitalized in a hepatology ward (attack rate, 0.9%). Since strain typing ruled out a clonal dissemination, we performed a case-control study. In addition to antibiotic use as a risk factor, the C. difficile infection rate was higher among patients with autoimmune hepatitis (P<.01).

Acquisition of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients in intensive care units: role of antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity.

A matched case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for acquiring multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients during a 2-year period. MDRPA was defined as P. aeruginosa with combined decreased susceptibility to piperacillin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and ciprofloxacin. Thirty-seven patients who were colonized or infected with MDRPA were identified, 34 of whom were matched with 34 control patients who had cultures that showed no growth of P. aeruginosa. Matching criteria were severity of illness and length of ICU stay, with each control patient staying in the ICU for at least as long as the time period between the corresponding case patient's admission to the ICU and the acquisition of MDRPA. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and the use of invasive procedures were similar for case patients and control patients. Multivariate analysis identified duration of ciprofloxacin treatment as an independent risk factor for MDRPA acquisition, whereas the duration of treatment with imipenem was of borderline significance. These data support a major role for the use of antibiotics with high antipseudomonal activity, particularly ciprofloxacin, in the emergence of MDRPA.

Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in home care settings: prevalence, duration, and transmission to household members.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have documented prolonged colonization with hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) after hospital discharge. However, information is lacking about factors associated with prolonged MRSA colonization and MRSA transmission to household contacts. METHODS: From February 2003 to March 2004, adult inpatients (except obstetric patients) were screened for MRSA carriage before discharge to home health care. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate rates and risk factors of MRSA carriage at discharge, MRSA clearance within 1 year, and MRSA transmission to household contacts. RESULTS: We identified MRSA in 191 of the 1501 patients screened before discharge to home health care (12.7%). Of the 148 patients with MRSA who were observed, 75 cleared the organism within 1 year, with an estimated median time to clearance of 282 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 233-313 days). Clearance of MRSA was associated with self-sufficiency in daily activities (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) (P = .049). Of the 188 included household contacts, 36 acquired MRSA (19.1%). Factors associated with household MRSA acquisition were older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.71 per life decade; 95% CI, 1.32-2.21) (P = .001) and participation in the health care of the index patient (adjusted odds ratio, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.33-9.62) (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-acquired MRSA carriage was common at discharge to home health care and was frequently prolonged. Transmission occurred in nearly 20% of household contacts and was associated with older age and participation in health care of the index patient. Household contacts should apply infection control measures similar to those recommended in the hospital setting.