Impact of pharmacist medication review for paediatric patients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients are at high risk of medication errors and adverse drug events due to complex medical care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of pharmacist medication review for paediatric patients. SETTING: A single-centre prospective observational study was performed over 33 months, from February 2018 to October 2020 in a French Hospital. METHOD: Clinical pharmacists provided medication counselling at a hospital and conducted telephone follow-ups between 3 and 7 days after discharge of paediatric patients with chronic diseases for whom treatment was introduced or modified during hospitalisation or hospital consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of drug-related problems (DRPs), the number and type of pharmacist intervention and paediatrician acceptance rates were assessed. Parents' understanding and drug-related needs were compared before and after medication review. Time to outpatient treatment and patient satisfaction were determined. Statistical analyses were performed in Excel. RESULTS: In total, 195 paediatric patients were included. Pharmacists identified 65 interventions, 95% of which were accepted. The most frequent DRPs included inappropriate drug administration (32.3%), herb-drug interactions (24.6%) and dose selection (17%). Parents' knowledge increased by 28% from baseline after pharmacist's medication counselling. Parents' drug-related needs concerning administration and side effects decreased by 67% and 49%, respectively, following the pharmacist's medication counselling. Most (75%) of the patients were able to get their treatment immediately after discharge. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacists can improve medication safety for children during the discharge process or consultations, by reducing prescription errors, optimising administration, counselling patients or parents and helping to ensure care continuity.

[Adjuvant hormonal therapy for early breast cancer: Assessment of patients' satisfaction]. / Évaluation de la satisfaction de patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein précoce traitées en adjuvant par hormonothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Since the cancer plan, evaluation of professional practices is essential to ensure the implementation of high-quality health care. Assess patient satisfaction is one of the pillars of high-quality health care. The main objective of the study was to assess the satisfaction of patients with early breast cancer taking a hormonal therapy, the secondary objective was to identify factors associated with their satisfaction. METHODS: The modified EORTC OUT-PATSAT-35 questionnaire was sent to a sample of patients in Franche-Comté in order to evaluate nine dimensions of satisfaction among which interpersonal skills, provided information, and overall satisfaction. For each dimension, a satisfaction score between 0 (no satisfaction) and 100 (highest satisfaction) was measured. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the factors associated with satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean overall satisfaction score for the 280 patients who answered was 73 [0-100]. Practicing an extra-professional activity was associated with higher satisfaction for several dimensions (odds ratio between 2.80 and 4.12, P<0.05) whereas it was decreased in the case of a modified appetite (odds ratio between 0.27 and 0.52, P<0.05). No link has been shown between satisfaction and adherence. DISCUSSION: The patients were satisfied and several factors impacting their satisfaction were identified, based on a questionnaire that must evolve to take into account the ambulatory aspect of their care. During the consultations, particular attention will be paid to these factors.

A systematic review of economic evaluation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The economic evaluation (EE) of healthcare interventions has become a necessity. However, high quality needs to be ensured in order to achieve validated results and help making informed decisions. Thus, the objective of the present study was to systematically identify and review published pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-related EEs and to assess their quality. METHODS: Systematic literature research was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane to identify published EEs between 2000 and 2015. The quality of each selected EE was assessed by two independent reviewers, using the Drummond's checklist. RESULTS: Our systematic review was based on 32 EEs and showed a wide variety of methodological approaches, including different perspectives, time horizon, and cost effectiveness analyses. Nearly two-thirds of EEs are full EEs (n = 21), and about one-third of EEs had a Drummond score ≥7, synonymous with 'high quality'. Close to 50% of full EEs had a Drummond score ≥7, whereas all of partial EEs had a Drummond score <7 (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 15 years, a lot of interest has been evinced over the EE of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its direct impact on therapeutic advances in PDAC. To provide a framework for health care decision-making, to facilitate transferability and to lend credibility to health EEs, their quality must be improved. For the last 4 years, a tendency towards a quality improvement of these studies has been observed, probably coupled with a context of rational decision-making in health care, a better and wider spread of recommendations and thus, medical practitioners' full endorsement.