Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions targeting optimal physical or cognitive function in adults with a history of cancer and describe the breadth of evidence as well as strengths and limitations across a range of functional domains. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The time scope was January 2008 to April 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective, controlled trials including single- and multiarm cohorts investigating rehabilitative interventions for cancer survivors at any point in the continuum of care were included, if studies included a primary functional outcome measure. Secondary data analyses and pilot/feasibility studies were excluded. Full-text review identified 362 studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction was performed by coauthor teams and quality and bias assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Scheme (class I-IV). DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies for which the functional primary endpoint achieved significance were categorized into 9 functional areas foundational to cancer rehabilitation: (1) quality of life (109 studies), (2) activities of daily living (61 studies), (3) fatigue (59 studies), (4) functional mobility (55 studies), (5) exercise behavior (37 studies), (6) cognition (20 studies), (7) communication (10 studies), (8) sexual function (6 studies), and (9) return to work (5 studies). Most studies were categorized as class III in quality/bias. Averaging results found within each of the functional domains, 71% of studies reported statistically significant results after cancer rehabilitation intervention(s) for at least 1 functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence supporting the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for individuals with a cancer history. The findings should be balanced with the understanding that many studies had moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in study quality by AAN criteria. These results may provide a foundation for future work to establish clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative interventions across cancer disease types.

Use of low-level laser therapy for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common conditions all over the world. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in patients with CRS. Fourteen adult patients with CRS participated in this single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial (12 male, mean age 40 years). Patients received five successive sessions of sham laser followed by five successive sessions of real laser after 2 days. Ga-Al-As laser of 830 nm in a continuous mode at a power output of 30 mW and energy dose of 1 J was applied on the cheeks and the forehead for the maxillary and frontal sinuses, respectively. Laser was delivered on six points over each sinus, each point for 33 s. Four measurements were taken. The total symptom score (TSS) was calculated as the primary outcome measure. The effects of LLLT on TSS were evaluated by using repeated measure ANOVA. The percentage improvement of real laser and sham laser was compared by Wilcoxon signed ranked test. Cohen's d was used to calculate the effect size. Total symptom score significantly improved after real laser (p = 0.015, Cohen's d = 0.69). The percentage improvement for real laser (34.12 ± 46.43) was significantly better than the sham laser (5.02 ± 37.34, Z = - 2.23, p = 0.026). No significant improvements were observed after sham laser. This study indicates that five-session active LLLT when compared with sham is effective in the treatment of CRS symptoms.

Balance in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can affect balance via different mechanisms, including sensory and motor peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, and reduced muscle strength and flexibility. To provide an overview of what is currently known about the effects of cancer treatment on balance in pediatric ALL patients and survivors, and of the predictors of poor balance, a review of the literature was conducted. METHODS: Five databases were searched for English-language original research articles on balance during or after treatment for pediatric ALL. RESULTS: From a total of nine studies, six identified significant balance problems in children with ALL during or after treatment. The percentage of patients or survivors with impaired balance varied between 27% and 69% during treatment, 7% and 65% a few years after completion of treatment, and 14% and 17% many years after the completion of treatment. Factors associated with impaired balance were higher body mass index; higher intrathecal methotrexate dose; cranial radiation; knee extensor weakness; and impaired cognition. CONCLUSION: Although heterogeneity between the studies regarding patient age; age at diagnosis; time since completion of treatment; and methods of quantifying balance make it difficult to reach a single conclusion, the evidence suggests that survivors may experience short- and/or long-term balance difficulties. While there is a need for additional studies to better understand the effects of impaired balance in survivors, clinicians treating both child and adult survivors of ALL need to be aware of these potential risks.

Balance impairment in survivors of pediatric brain cancers: risk factors and associated physical limitations.

PURPOSE: The study aims were to determine the prevalence of balance impairments in adult survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, and to identify predictors of and limitations associated with balance impairments. METHODS: Participants were adult survivors (N = 329) of pediatric CNS tumors. Balance was considered impaired among those with composite scores < 70 on the sensory organization test. Potential predictors of impaired balance were evaluated with generalized linear regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between balance impairment and function. RESULTS: Balance impairment was observed in 48% of survivors, and associated with infratentorial tumor location (OR = 4.0, 95% CI, 2.0-7.6), shunt placement (OR = 3.5, 95% CI, 1.8-6.7), increased body fat percentage (OR = 1.1, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1), hearing loss (OR = 11.1, 95% CI, 5.6-22.2), flexibility limitations (OR = 2.0, 95% CI, 1.0-3.9), peripheral neuropathy (OR = 2.4, 95% CI, 1.2-4.5), and cognitive deficits (OR = 2.2, 95% CI, 1.1-4.7). In adjusted models, impaired balance was associated with limitations in overall physical performance (OR = 3.6, 95% CI, 2.0-6.3), mobility (OR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.5-4.4), diminished walking endurance (OR = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.7-5.0), and non-independent living (OR = 2.0, 95% CI, 1.0-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors have impaired balance, which is associated with mobility and physical performance limitations. Interventions to address the complex needs of this population should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors with identified risk factors should be closely evaluated for presence of balance impairment. Interventions tailored to improve balance also can positively affect function and mobility in survivors.

Peripheral Neuropathy, Sensory Processing, and Balance in Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Purpose To compare peripheral nervous system function and balance between adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and matched controls and to determine associations between peripheral neuropathy (PN) and limitations in static balance, mobility, walking endurance, and quality of life (QoL) among survivors. Patients and Methods Three hundred sixty-five adult survivors of childhood ALL and 365 controls with no cancer history completed assessments of PN (modified Total Neuropathy Score [mTNS]), static balance (Sensory Organization Test [SOT]), mobility (Timed Up and Go), walking endurance (6-minute walk test), QoL (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey), and visual-motor processing speed (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale). Results PN, but not impairments, in performance on SOT was more common in survivors than controls (41.4% v 9.5%, respectively; P < .001). In multivariable models, higher mTNS scores were associated with longer time to complete the Timed Up and Go (ß = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.23; P < .001), shorter distance walked in 6 minutes (ß = -4.39; 95% CI, -8.63 to -0.14; P = .04), and reduced QoL (ß = -1.33; 95% CI, -1.79 to -0.87; P < .001 for physical functioning; ß = -1.16; 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.67; P < .001 for role physical; and ß = -0.88; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.42; P < .001 for general health). Processing speed (ß = 1.69; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.40; P < .001), but not mTNS score, was associated with anterior-posterior sway on the SOT. Conclusion PN in long-term ALL survivors is associated with movement, including mobility and walking endurance, but not with static standing balance. The association between processing speed and sway suggests that static balance impairment in ALL survivors may be influenced by problems with CNS function, including the processing of sensory information.

A pilot study into the effect of low-level laser therapy in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of the nose and paranasal sinuses that has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. No study has examined the effectiveness of applying low-level laser therapy (LLLT) locally over the sinuses in patients with CRS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LLLT in patients with CRS. Fifteen adult patients with CRS participated in this pilot pretest-posttest clinical study. Patients were treated with a 830-nm Ga-Al-As laser in continuous-wave mode at a power output of 30 mW and energy dose of 1 J. Laser irradiation was delivered on six points over each maxillary or frontal sinus with 33 sec irradiation for each point and a total treatment duration of 198 sec for each sinus. Patients were given LLLT three times per week for ten treatment sessions. Patients were asked to score their symptoms in accordance with a four-point scale (0-3), and a total symptom score (TSS) for each patient was calculated. Percentage improvement of TSS was considered as the primary outcome measure. TSS was calculated at baseline (T0), at 2 weeks (T1) and at 4 weeks (T2). The TSS was improved significantly at T1 (39%) and at T2 (46.34%). A large effect size for LLLT was found (ηp(2) ηp(2) = 0.63). The therapeutic effect was sustained for a mean of 5 months. This pilot study indicates that LLLT applied for 4 weeks improves symptoms in patients with CRS.