Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 105(1): 221-227, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is nonreversible and remains the biggest obstacle to long-term survival after lung transplantation (LTx). Retransplantation is the sole definitive therapeutic option for CLAD. We analyzed our single-center experience with retransplantation as a treatment option for CLAD. METHODS: From March 1, 2010, to May 31, 2016, 419 consecutive patients underwent LTx at our institution; 29 of these procedures were retransplantations for CLAD. We analyzed demographic characteristics, lung allocation score, operation type, length of stay, and perioperative outcomes. Actuarial survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: In total, 29 of 419 patients (6.9%) underwent retransplantation for CLAD. Median time from primary LTx to retransplantation was 1,163 days (range: 304 to 3,971 days). Patients undergoing retransplantation were younger and had higher lung allocation scores than primary transplantation patients. Most LTx procedures were bilateral (93% of retransplantations, 95% of primary LTx). Rates of cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe primary graft dysfunction, and re-exploration for bleeding were higher in retransplantation patients (p = 0.010, p = 0.019, and p = 0.029, respectively). One- and 5-year survival rates in the retransplantation group were similar to those of the primary LTx group (89.2% and 64.3% versus 89.7% and 58.2%, respectively; p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Lung retransplantation is a viable treatment option for CLAD after LTx. In this study, retransplantation patients were younger, had higher lung allocation scores, and were more likely to require cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support than primary LTx patients. Postoperative length of stay and short- and mid-term survival were comparable with those of primary LTx patients.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/cirurgia , Transplante de Pulmão , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 154(5): 1798-1809, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29042051

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used as a bridge to lung transplantation in patients with rapid pulmonary function deterioration. The reported success of this modality and perioperative and functional outcomes are varied. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent lung transplantation at our institution over 1 year (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015). Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as a bridge to transplant; preoperative characteristics, lung transplantation outcomes, and survival were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 12 (13%) received bridge to transplant, and 81 (87%) did not. Patients receiving bridge to transplant were younger, had higher lung allocation scores, had lower functional status, and were more often on mechanical ventilation at listing. Most patients who received bridge to transplant (n = 10, 83.3%) had pulmonary fibrosis. Mean pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was 103.6 hours in duration (range, 16-395 hours). All patients who received bridge to transplant were decannulated immediately after lung transplantation but were more likely to return to the operating room for secondary chest closure or rethoracotomy. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction within 72 hours was similar between groups. Lung transplantation success and hospital discharge were 100% in the bridge to transplant group; however, these patients experienced longer hospital stays and higher rates of discharge to acute rehabilitation. The 1-year survival was 100% in the bridge to transplant group and 91% in the non-bridge to transplant group (log-rank, P = .24). The 1-year functional status was excellent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be used to safely bridge high-acuity patients with end-stage lung disease to lung transplantation with good 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival and excellent 1-year functional status. Long-term outcomes are being studied.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Transplante de Pulmão , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/mortalidade , Pneumopatias/fisiopatologia , Pneumopatias/cirurgia , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Pulmão/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA