A pragmatic outreach pilot to understand and overcome barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in abdominal organ transplant.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Early data show a lower severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike antibody immune response among SOTRs leading to patient concerns about vaccine efficacy. Public health messaging has largely left out immunocompromized individuals leading to a higher risk of vaccine misinformation. The American Society of Transplantation recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all SOTRs; however, patient concerns and beliefs about vaccination are largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a transplant-center-based, pragmatic pilot trial to encourage COVID-19 vaccination among 103 unvaccinated SOTRs. We assessed vaccine concerns, barriers to vaccination, answered questions about efficacy, side effects, and clinical recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 24% (n = 25) of SOTRs reported that they will schedule COVID-19 vaccination after the study call, 46% reported that they will consider vaccination in the future, and 30% said they will not consider vaccination. Older age and White race were associated with lower willingness to schedule the vaccine, whereas Black race and longer time from transplant were associated with higher willingness. Common vaccine concerns included lack of long-term data, inconsistent messaging from providers, scheduling inconvenience, and insufficient resources. Follow-up approximately 1 month after the initial outreach found 52% (n = 13) of liver transplant recipients, and 10% (n = 3) of kidney transplant recipients subsequently received COVID-19 vaccines for a vaccination rate of 29% among respondents. CONCLUSION: Transplant center-based vaccine outreach efforts can decrease misinformation and increase vaccination uptake; however, vaccine-related mistrust remains high.

Active Tuberculosis After Solid Organ Transplantation in Individuals With Negative Pretransplant QuantiFERON-TB Gold Testing: A Case Series.

Active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients most commonly occurs due to reactivation of latent infection and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, including allograft loss and death. National transplant societies, including the American Society of Transplantation, recommend screening for latent TB prior to transplant, with treatment in the peritransplant setting to reduce the subsequent risk of TB reactivation. Though screening is traditionally conducted using laboratory-based assays, such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold, false negatives may occur in SOT candidates due to anergy from end-stage organ dysfunction, highlighting the need for a multimodal diagnostic approach. In this case series, we describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 3 SOT recipients at the University of Pennsylvania with negative pretransplant QuantiFERON-TB Gold testing who subsequently developed active TB in the posttransplant setting, contributing to a growing body of knowledge regarding this challenging population. Each patient experienced a complicated clinical course that arose in part from the lack of diagnosis of TB prior to transplant. Because all had epidemiologic risk factors for TB, the findings of our study highlight the need for more individualized approaches to pretransplant TB screening.

Successful transatlantic bilateral hand transplant in a young female highly sensitized to HLA class II antigens.

Vascularized composite allografts may be more susceptible to rejection than other types of organ transplants, particularly in sensitized recipients. We describe a successful transatlantic bilateral hand transplant in a 40-year old woman who was highly sensitized to class II HLA antigens including HLA-DPB1 (UNet CPRA = 86%). Prior to transplantation, we selected an upper limb donor based on HLA class II matching and absence of donor specific antibodies, given evidence that class II mismatches are associated with acute cellular rejection in hand transplants. The patient was conditioned using five doses of thymoglobulin, and her immunosuppression included tacrolimus, rapamycin, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Post-transplant, the patient non-DSA anti-HLA antibody levels drastically increased, but only transiently and weak DSAs developed, which became undetectable by two months posttransplant. Following transplantation, periodic biopsies over 6 months indicated no evidence of rejection except for transient Banff grade 1 and one sample with grade 2 acute rejection. There was no evidence of rejection on her recent 1-year follow-up. The patient is currently healthy, has recovered protective sensibility, and is regaining excellent function. This case highlights the importance of pre-transplantation planning, donor selection/compatibility, and ethical considerations in the ultimate success of VCA.