Effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on the local recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW: The decision whether to include postoperative radiotherapy on patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma depends on the risk of local recurrence. The objectives of this study were to systematically review literature on whether perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients is associated with higher local recurrence rates and whether local recurrence is influenced by the administration of postoperative radiotherapy in patients presenting with perineural invasion. TYPE OF REVIEW: Systematic review. SEARCH STRATEGY: Embase, PubMed, Web Of Science. EVALUATION METHOD: The databases above were searched for studies that analysed: the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with perineural invasion, local recurrence and postoperative radiotherapy. The data of seven studies were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. There was no evidence of the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on local recurrence rates in patients presenting with perineural invasion. Some evidence suggests that local recurrence rates may increase in cases of multifocal perineural invasion, especially if nerves >1 mm are involved but these data should be interpreted with caution due to the low-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence regarding the prognostic value of perineural invasion and the impact of postoperative radiotherapy in patients presenting with perineural invasion is lacking in the literature, making it difficult to select a postoperative strategy for early-stage tumours.

Pre-treatment radiomic features predict individual lymph node failure for head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop and validate a pre-treatment radiomics-based prediction model to identify pathological lymph nodes (pLNs) at risk of failures after definitive radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Training and validation cohorts consisted of 165 patients with 558 pLNs and 112 patients with 467 pLNs, respectively. All patients were primarily treated with definitive radiotherapy, with or without systemic treatment. The endpoint was the cumulative incidence of nodal failure. For each pLN, 82 pre-treatment CT radiomic features and 7 clinical features were included in the Cox proportional-hazard analysis. RESULTS: There were 68 and 23 nodal failures in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed three clinical features (T-stage, gender and WHO Performance-status) and two radiomic features (Least-axis-length representing nodal size and gray level co-occurrence matrix based - Correlation representing nodal heterogeneity) as independent prognostic factors. The model showed good discrimination with a c-index of 0.80 (0.69-0.91) in the validation cohort, significantly better than models based on clinical features (p < 0.001) or radiomics (p = 0.003) alone. High- and low-risk groups were defined by using thresholds of estimated nodal failure risks at 2-year of 60% and 10%, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 94.4% and 98.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A pre-treatment prediction model was developed and validated, integrating the quantitative radiomic features of individual lymph nodes with generally used clinical features. Using this prediction model, lymph nodes with a high failure risk can be identified prior to treatment, which might be used to select patients for intensified treatment strategies targeted on individual lymph nodes.

Survival Patterns in Elderly Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the effect of age on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and non-cancer-related death (NCRD) in elderly (aged ≥70 years) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with definitive radiation therapy. The results were compared with those of younger patients, and the most important prognostic factors for survival endpoints were determined. Treatments may be better justified based on identification of the main differences in survival between young and elderly patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were analyzed from all consecutive HNSCC patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (66-70 Gy) in our department between April 2007 and December 2014. A total of 674 patients, including 168 elderly patients (24.9%), were included in the study. Multivariate association models were constructed to assess the effect of age on survival endpoints. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors for survival in elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 674 consecutive patients, including 168 elderly patients, were analyzed. The 5-year OS and NCRD rates were significantly worse for elderly patients than for young patients: 45.5% versus 58.2% (P=.007) and 39.0% versus 20.7% (P<.001), respectively. In the multivariate association analysis on the relationship between age and OS, lymph node involvement and worse World Health Organization (WHO) performance status were identified as significant confounders. Multivariate association analysis between age and NCRD identified Union for International Cancer Control stage as a significant confounder. After correction for confounders, the effect of age on OS and NCRD increased. Worse WHO performance status, lymph node involvement, and specific tumor site were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in the elderly patient group. Of the elderly patients, 80 (47%) died during follow-up; 45% of these deaths were ascribed to the index tumor. For elderly patients, radiation therapy combined with systemic forms of treatment was significantly associated with adverse NCRD rate (hazard ratio, 8.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-27.2; P=.001) after we performed a multivariate association analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly HNSCC patients have worse survival outcomes than young HNSCC patients. Age is an independent prognostic factor for OS, mainly due to an increase in non-cancer-related mortality and comorbid diseases. The differences in CSS between young and elderly patients are negligible.

Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors.

OBJECT: The authors sought to determine the incidence, time course, and risk factors for overall adverse radiation effect (ARE) and symptomatic ARE after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS: All cases of brain metastases treated from 1998 through 2009 with Gamma Knife SRS at UCSF were considered. Cases with less than 3 months of follow-up imaging, a gap of more than 8 months in imaging during the 1st year, or inadequate imaging availability were excluded. Brain scans and pathology reports were reviewed to ensure consistent scoring of dates of ARE, treatment failure, or both; in case of uncertainty, the cause of lesion worsening was scored as indeterminate. Cumulative incidence of ARE and failure were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring at last imaging. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 435 patients and 2200 brain metastases evaluable, the median patient survival time was 17.4 months and the median lesion imaging follow-up was 9.9 months. Calculated on the basis of 2200 evaluable lesions, the rates of treatment failure, ARE, concurrent failure and ARE, and lesion worsening with indeterminate cause were 9.2%, 5.4%, 1.4%, and 4.1%, respectively. Among 118 cases of ARE, approximately 60% were symptomatic and 85% occurred 3-18 months after SRS (median 7.2 months). For 99 ARE cases managed without surgery or bevacizumab, the probabilities of improvement observed on imaging were 40%, 57%, and 76% at 6, 12, and 18 months after onset of ARE. The most important risk factors for ARE included prior SRS to the same lesion (with 20% 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE vs 3%, 4%, and 8% for no prior treatment, prior whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT], or concurrent WBRT) and any of these volume parameters: target, prescription isodose, 12-Gy, or 10-Gy volume. Excluding lesions treated with repeat SRS, the 1-year probabilities of ARE were < 1%, 1%, 3%, 10%, and 14% for maximum diameter 0.3-0.6 cm, 0.7-1.0 cm, 1.1-1.5 cm, 1.6-2.0 cm, and 2.1-5.1 cm, respectively. The 1-year probabilities of symptomatic ARE leveled off at 13%-14% for brain metastases maximum diameter > 2.1 cm, target volume > 1.2 cm(3), prescription isodose volume > 1.8 cm(3), 12-Gy volume > 3.3 cm(3), and 10-Gy volume > 4.3 cm(3), excluding lesions treated with repeat SRS. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, capecitabine, but not other systemic therapy within 1 month of SRS, appeared to increase ARE risk. For the multivariate analysis considering only metastases with target volume > 1.0 cm(3), risk factors for ARE included prior SRS, kidney primary tumor, connective tissue disorder, and capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Although incidence of ARE after SRS was low overall, risk increased rapidly with size and volume, leveling off at a 1-year cumulative incidence of 13%-14%. This study describes the time course of ARE and provides risk estimates by various lesion characteristics and treatment parameters to aid in decision-making and patient counseling.

Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia.

PURPOSE: To determine if acute symptoms during definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CHRT) are prognostic factors for late dysphagia in head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study consisted of 260 HNC patients who received definitive RT or CHRT. The primary endpoint was grade 2-4 swallowing dysfunction at 6 months after completing RT (SWALM6). During treatment, acute symptoms, including oral mucositis, xerostomia and dysphagia, were scored, and the scores were accumulated weekly and entered into an existing reference model for SWALM6 that consisted of dose-volume variables only. RESULTS: Both acute xerostomia and dysphagia were strong prognostic factors for SWALM6. When acute scores were added as variables to the reference model, model performance increased as the course of treatment progressed: the AUC rose from 0.78 at the baseline to 0.85 in week 6. New models built for weeks 3-6 were significantly better able to identify patients with and without late dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Acute xerostomia and dysphagia during the course of RT are strong prognostic factors for late dysphagia. Including accumulated acute symptom scores on a weekly basis in prediction models for late dysphagia significantly improves the identification of high-risk and low-risk patients at an early stage during treatment and might facilitate individualized treatment adaptation.