Location and motion of vaginal pessaries in situ in women with successful and unsuccessful pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the location and motion of pessaries between women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with a successful (fitting) and unsuccessful (non-fitting) pessary treatment on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). METHODS: A cross-sectional exploratory study of 15 women who underwent a mid-sagittal dMRI of the pelvic floor at rest, during contraction and during Valsalva with three different types of pessaries. The coordinates of the pessaries cross section, inferior pubic point (IPP) and sacrococcygeal junction (SCJ) were obtained and the location (position, orientation) and the motion (translation and rotation) were calculated. Differences between the groups and between the pessaries within the groups were compared. RESULTS: Nine women with a fitting pessary and 6 women with a non-fitting pessary were selected. In the non-fitting group, the pessaries were positioned more caudally and rotated more in clockwise direction and descended more, but not significantly, during Valsalva compared with the fitting group. The Falk pessary was positioned more anteriorly in the fitting group and more cranially in the non-fitting group compared with the ring and ring with support pessary. CONCLUSIONS: A non-fitting pessary was positioned more caudally at rest; on Valsalva, it rotated more clockwise and moved more caudally, suggesting that the dynamic characteristics of the pessary might play an important role in its effectiveness. Findings of this study serve as a basis for the development of new pessary designs.

Toward Holographic-Guided Surgery.

The implementation of augmented reality (AR) in image-guided surgery (IGS) can improve surgical interventions by presenting the image data directly on the patient at the correct position and in the actual orientation. This approach can resolve the switching focus problem, which occurs in conventional IGS systems when the surgeon has to look away from the operation field to consult the image data on a 2-dimensional screen. The Microsoft HoloLens, a head-mounted AR display, was combined with an optical navigation system to create an AR-based IGS system. Experiments were performed on a phantom model to determine the accuracy of the complete system and to evaluate the effect of adding AR. The results demonstrated a mean Euclidean distance of 2.3 mm with a maximum error of 3.5 mm for the complete system. Adding AR visualization to a conventional system increased the mean error by 1.6 mm. The introduction of AR in IGS was promising. The presented system provided a solution for the switching focus problem and created a more intuitive guidance system. With a further reduction in the error and more research to optimize the visualization, many surgical applications could benefit from the advantages of AR guidance.

A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.

PURPOSE: To design a relevant method to compare the virtual planned implant position to the ultimately achieved implant position and to evaluate, in case of discrepancy, the cause for this. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five consecutive edentulous patients with retention problems of the upper denture received four implants in the maxilla. Preoperatively, first a cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan was acquired, followed by virtual implant planning. Then, a surgical template was designed and endosseous implants were flapless installed using the template as a guide. To inventory any differences in position, the postoperative CBCT scan was matched to the preoperative scan. The accuracy of implant placement was validated three-dimensionally (3D) and the Implant Position Orthogonal Projection (IPOP) validation method was applied to project the results to a bucco-lingual and mesio-distal plane. Subsequently, errors introduced by virtual planning, surgical instruments, and validation process were evaluated. RESULTS: The bucco-lingual deviations were less obvious than mesio-distal deviations. A maximum linear tip deviation of 2.84 mm, shoulder deviation of 2.42 mm, and angular deviation of 3.41° were calculated in mesio-distal direction. Deviations included errors in planning software (maximum 0.15 mm), for surgical procedure (maximum 2.94°), and validation process (maximum 0.10 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the IPOP validation method as an accurate method to evaluate implant positions and to elucidate inaccuracies in virtual implant planning systems.

Entry Point Variation in the Osseous Fixation Pathway of the Anterior Column of the Pelvis-A Three-Dimensional Analysis.

Fractures of the superior pubic ramus can be treated with screw insertion into the osseous fixation pathway (OFP) of the anterior column (AC). The entry point determines whether the screw exits the OFP prematurely. This can be harmful when it enters the hip joint or damages soft tissues inside the lesser pelvis. The exact entry point varies between patients and can be difficult to ascertain on fluoroscopy during surgery. The aim of this study was to determine variation in the location of the entry point. A retrospective single center study was performed at a level 1 trauma center in the Netherlands. Nineteen adult patients were included with an undisplaced fracture of the superior pubic ramus on computer tomography (CT)-scan. Virtual three-dimensional (3D) models of the pelvises were created. Multiple screws were placed per AC and the models were superimposed. A total of 157 screws were placed, of which 109 did not exit the OFP prematurely. A universally reproducible entry point could not be identified. A typical crescent shaped region of entry points did exist and was located more laterally in females when compared to males. Three-dimensional virtual surgery planning can be helpful to identify the ideal entry points in each case.

A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the clinically relevant accuracy of implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using computer planning and a mucosa-supported surgical template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In each of in total 30 consecutive edentulous patients suffering from retention problems of their upper denture, two or four Brånemark MkIII Groovy (Nobel Biocare®, Zürich, Switzerland) implants in the maxilla were installed. Preoperatively, first, a cone-beam computer tomography (cone beam computer tomography) scan was acquired, followed by virtual implant planning. Hereafter, a surgical template was designed to allow flapless implant placement using the template as a guide. To inventory the accuracy of implant placement, a postoperative CBCT scan was obtained and matched to the preoperative scan. The accuracy of implant placement was validated three-dimensionally. The Implant Position Orthogonal Projection validation method was applied to measure the clinically relevant implant deviations (i.e., in both the bucco-lingual and mesio-distal plane). Also, the influence of type of surgery, use of fixation pins, and position on the dental arch were investigated with regard to implant deviations. RESULTS: In total, 104 implants were installed. In bucco-lingual direction, a mean implant deviation of 0.67 mm was scored at the implant tip, of 0.51 mm at the shoulder, of -0.83 mm in depth, as also a mean deviation of angulation of 1.74°. In mesio-distal direction, a mean implant deviation of 0.75 mm was found at the implant tip, of 0.60 mm at the implant shoulder, of -0.75 mm in depth, and a deviation of angulation of 1.94°. Of all implants, 74% was placed not deep enough compared with the planning. Implant position on the dental arch, the use of fixation pins, and type of surgery showed no significant effect on implant deviations. However, a significant difference for implant deviations in both buccal and mesial direction was observed, explained by a nonoptimal positioning of the surgical template. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided implant planning showed to be a clinically relevant tool for the placement of two or four implants in the maxilla of fully edentulous patients. Exact positioning of the surgical template in anterior/posterior direction is crucial in reducing implant deviations both in buccal and mesial direction.

An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinically relevant accuracy of implant placement in the augmented maxilla using computer planning and a mucosa-supported surgical template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive edentulous patients with an extreme maxillar alveolar ridge resorption were treated with a bone augmentation procedure. In a second stage, six Brånemark MkIII Groovy (Nobel Biocare®, Zürich, Switzerland) implants were installed. Preoperatively, a cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired, followed by virtual implant planning and flapless implant placement using a surgical template. A postoperative CBCT scan was acquired and registered to the preoperative scan. The Implant Position Orthogonal Projection validation method was applied to measure implant deviations in both the buccolingual and mesio-distal plane. The influence of fixation pins and the position on the dental arch were investigated with regard to implant deviations, and rotations and translations of the surgical template. RESULTS: One hundred fifty implants were installed. In mesio-distal direction, a mean implant deviation of 1.50 mm was scored at the implant tip, 1.27 mm at the shoulder, -0.60 mm in depth, as well as a mean deviation of angulation of 2.50°. In buccolingual direction, a mean implant deviation of 0.99 mm was found at the implant tip, 0.76 mm at the implant shoulder, -0.57 mm in depth, and a deviation of angulation of 2.48°. Of all implants, 53% was placed too superficial compared with the planning. The use of fixation pins and implant deviations in both buccal and mesial directions as also for rotations and translation of the surgical template showed statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided implant planning showed to be a clinically relevant tool. However, this study emphasizes that the surgeon should take into account that deviations are larger compared with implant placement without augmentation procedure. Deviations are mainly caused by angulations and translations of the surgical template.