[Links between depressive disorders and dependent personality disorders: The important effect of locus of control]. / Liens entre la dépression et la dépendance interpersonnelle : l'importance du locus de contrôle.

CONTEXT: Empirical researches have proved that there are powerful correlations between dependent personality and depression. Different hypotheses were described to conceptualize links between these two entities. The dysfunction of attributive style seems to be linked to dependency and to depression. Interpersonal dependency can be considered to be a mode of adaptation to the external direction of the locus of control. The self-esteem so subjected to the climate of social interactions can lead, by the discontinuity of its protective relations, to the depression. In a coordinated model, this study explores psychopathological aspects between depressive cognition, self-esteem and interpersonal dependency. OBJECTIVE: This study tries to support the hypothesis that depression and dependency are consequences of an external locus of control, secondary in deterioration of the self-esteem and the main objective is to highlight correlations between external locus of control, interpersonal dependency, hopelessness and depressive affect. METHOD: The regrouping of 42 patients in a protocol of psychotherapeutic practices allowed the realization of this retrospective study, multicentric within different hospitals or ambulant psychiatric structures of the agglomeration of Lille, during a period of 6 months. The administration of questionnaires (Beck Depression Inventory/Dependent Personality Questionnaire by Tyrer, translated by Loas/Hopelessness Scale by Beck/Powerful others and Chance Scale [IPC] of Levenson, translated by Loas) was included into clinical practice. RESULTS: The main results indicate that external locus of control "powerful others" is significantly correlated with pathological dependency (P<0.0001), depression (P<0.0001) and hopelessness (P=0.02). In addition, the pathological dependency seems to be correlated with external locus "chance" (P<0.05) and external locus "powerful others" (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: We explored in this study the powerful links joining pathological dependency with depression. These correlations confirm and specify data found in literature. This work is in favor of a conception of external locus of control as a psychopathologic component between depression and dependent personality. This cognitive aspect manifests vulnerability in the depression of the patients suffering from pathological dependency. Also, the place of external locus of control ("powerful others" and "chance") seems to be a cognitive dimension more pathogenic than the internal locus of control. It will be necessary to investigate other psychopathological dimensions such as self-esteem in a longitudinal report. Without neglecting neurobiological vulnerability in depression, it is pertinent to identify this cognitive fragility to optimize the psychotherapies.

Multigene expression profile testing in breast cancer: is there a role for family physicians?

BACKGROUND: Family physicians (fps) play a role in aspects of personalized medicine in cancer, including assessment of increased risk because of family history. Little is known about the potential role of fps in supporting cancer patients who undergo tumour gene expression profile (gep) testing. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study with qualitative and quantitative components. Qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with fps and cancer specialists about the role of fps in breast cancer gep testing were obtained during studies conducted within the pan-Canadian canimpact research program. We determined the number of visits by breast cancer patients to a fp between the first medical oncology visit and the start of chemotherapy, a period when patients might be considering results of gep testing. RESULTS: The fps and cancer specialists felt that ordering gep tests and explaining the results was the role of the oncologist. A new fp role was identified relating to the fp-patient relationship: supporting patients in making adjuvant therapy decisions informed by gep tests by considering the patient's comorbid conditions, social situation, and preferences. Lack of fp knowledge and resources, and challenges in fp-oncologist communication were seen as significant barriers to that role. Between 28% and 38% of patients visited a fp between the first oncology visit and the start of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an emerging role for fps in supporting patients who are making adjuvant treatment decisions after receiving the results of gep testing. For success in this new role, education and point-of-care tools, together with more effective communication strategies between fps and oncologists, are needed.

[Determine the patient's position towards psychiatric care: a simple tool to estimate the alliance and the motivation]. / Déterminer la position du patient envers les soins psychiatriques avec le questionnaire Touriste-Plaignant-Client (TPC) : un outil simple pour évaluer l'alliance et la motivation.

OBJECTIVES: For the brief systemic therapy (BST), the evaluation of the patient's position towards the care is a prerequisite to psychotherapy. Three positions of the patient are described. The "tourist's" position: the patient claims to have no problem and doesn't suffer. Someone asks him to make an appointment, sometimes with threats. The "complaint's" position: the patient claims to suffer, but attributes the responsibility of this suffering to others. These two positions are not good for beginning a therapy. The "customer's" position differs from both previous positions. The "customer" considers that he has a psychological problem which depends on him and he is motivated in the resolution of it. In theory, the "customer" is more motivated and the therapeutic alliance is better. It is for this reason that the BST estimates the position of the patient at first, to bring the patient to the "customer's" position. The objective of this study is to assess an interview which identifies the patient's position towards the care, and to validate the theoretical elaborations of the brief systemic therapy. METHOD: The study concerns the follow-up of outpatients who consult a psychiatrist for the first time. The evaluation of the patients checks their position towards care using the Tourist-Complaint-Customer (TCC) inventory, how they suffer, the therapeutic alliance (scale Haq-2) and the compliance during care. The evaluation by the psychiatrists checks the suffering perceived, the motivation perceived and the diagnoses according to the DSM. RESULTS: The typology of these patients is made up of one half "complaint", a quarter of "tourist" and a quarter of "customer". The "customer's" position is correlated with the therapeutic alliance and the motivation perceived by the psychiatrist. The motivation perceived by the psychiatrist is correlated with the therapeutic alliance. These results correspond to the theoretical elaborations of the BST. CONCLUSION: the TCC inventory provides information on the motivation and the therapeutic alliance. If the patient is in "tourist" or "complaint" position, we recommend that the psychiatrist "work" to bring the patient to "customer" position. The evaluation of the position of the patient is simple and rich in information. We recommend that it be given a place in the daily practice of psychiatry.

[Dependent patient and interpersonal dependency: psychotherapeutic strategies]. / Personnalité dépendante et dépendance affective : stratégies psychothérapeutiques.

OBJECTIVES: This article is a review of psychotherapies for patients suffering from dependent personality and interpersonal dependency. METHOD: We synthesized articles making reference to this question, notably those written by Bornstein, author who refers to the dependent personality. We highlighted the psychotherapies that have been the object of an evaluation. The research on the subject is sparse: only eight studies permitting assessment of psychotherapies in this indication in 2005. Besides these psychotherapies, we detailed other approaches which are used by practitioners in these indications. RESULTS: The therapy does not aim at autonomy "at all costs", but that the patient finds a dependence "adapted" to his/her environment. Before starting a therapy, an evaluation is useful to specify the type of dependence. First of all, is there a "pathological" dependence? Is the suffering of the patient secondary to his personality or not supportive enough? Does insight exist? What is the reaction of the patient if we suggest the hypothesis of a dependence on his/her part? Does he/she consider this idea or reject it? Finally, is the dependence primary or secondary? For that purpose, it is necessary to study the biography of the patient and the appearance of the comorbidity over time. The primary dependence is seen in childhood and precedes the other psychological disorders. The secondary dependence follows after the comorbidity and events of life that alter self-esteem (depression, for example). Various therapeutic strategies arise from various currents. The therapies of analytical inspiration recommend replaying the relationship of object and explicitly evoking the transfer. The behavioural and cognitive psychotherapies aim at making the patient identify the cognitions which underlie the dependence, then leading the patient to modify his/her cognition and to behave in a more autonomous way, using the theory of learning. The humanist therapies aim at a therapeutic relationship of acceptance and respect for the patient, so that he/she increases self-esteem and finds autonomy. The brief systemic therapy develops tools to deviate from the relationship of dependence in the therapy. It aims at the change through a modification in the beliefs of the patient. The dependence can be envisaged as a way of adapting itself, of compensating for altered self-esteem. In this way, the psychotherapy must also attempt to restore self-esteem in an implicit or explicit way. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the type of dependence helps the therapeutic approach. It is necessary to look for the comorbidity and its appearance over time with regard to the dependence. So, in primary dependence, the therapy focuses on the increase of self-esteem. In the secondary dependence, the therapy focuses on the adaptation to this event, the treatment of the mental illness, and then to the accompaniment in restoring and autonomy. If the patient doesn't have insight, it is necessary either to enhance it, or to work in an indirect way.

[Affective dependency and psychiatry: a discord]. / La dépendance affective et la psychiatrie : une mésentente.

INTRODUCTION: The term "loving dependence" is increasingly used by professionals of the relation of help and the patients themselves. It joins in the wider spectre of the interpersonal dependency. More and more patients suffering from this disorder are coming for psychiatric consultation. However, this notion remains vague and absent in the vocabulary of the psychiatrists. Globally, this term describes the functioning of certain patients who present a fear of not being loved and a dependency on another person. The fear of not being loved provokes a fear of abandonment or incites development of strategies to be loved (seduce, help). Dependency on another person is a consequence of the lack of confidence in the capabilities of the individual. The other person reassures them because this person does what the patient is afraid of doing, because he/she does not feel capable. The lack of confidence in own's capabilities can also incite the individual to become a perfectionist and successful. The fear of not being loved and of not being competent is determined partly in the person's childhood. These impressions are real and/or the individuals are hypersensitive. AIM OF THE PAPER: The article describes the emotional, cognitive and behavioural levels, the various types of interpersonal dependency: dependences of type "umbilical cord", "rescuer", "stereotype" and "against dependence". The objective is to specify the concept better on clinical level, with the aim of defining criteria and pathological limits. This is the first stage before beginning rigorous scientific research. The stakes are high. There are relationships with anxiety, depressive disorders, alcoholism, food behaviour disorders, suicide and somatic pathologies. DISCUSSION: Dependency seems to be the consequence of a pathological expression of the normal dimensions of the personality: the need to be loved and valued (admired). The onset of dependency occurs in stages, when the person is weakened by events of life or by depression. The impression not to have been loved and/or valued in childhood is vulnerability. We detail the common points and the differences between the types of described dependences and the diagnostic categories of the DSM. The category-specific classification of the DSM is not adapted to making a diagnosis in these patients. To diagnose a pathological personality, the patient has to be constantly in a functioning of pathological intensity, which is not still the case. This is a real problem, because these clinical situations are very frequent. We defend a dimensional approach of the personality disorders. A meeting between the psychiatry and the relationally dependent person is possible, on one hand in a dimensional classification of personality disorders and, on the other, by working on self-esteem. The relational dependency and self-esteem share the same appearances and the same causes. There are two different names from the same identity.

[In favour of a systemic vision of liaison psychiatry]. / Pour une vision systémique de la psychiatrie de liaison.

One of the problems of consultation-liaison psychiatry is the absence of request of the patient. Indeed, the patients do not recognize their disorder and prefer to go to the emergency unit in a general hospital. Thus, we meet in the emergency unit or in medical unit (liaison psychiatry activity). This is the reason why this first meeting has to be prepared. Consultation-liaison Psychiatry proposes to provide medical staff with the competences developed by psychiatry, and the denomination: Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry, indicates the bipolarity of its practice according to whether the intervention is addressed to the patient (consultation) or to the staff (liaison). However collaboration is sometimes difficult and the psychiatrist often meets with resistance. This is the reason why psychiatrists must work on their integration in the general hospital. Indeed, the psychiatrist works in an institution which is unfamiliar and he/she must adapt and create new practices if it is going to work. It is now clearly established that consultation-liaison psychiatry is not limited to consultations with patients, but is based on collaboration with medical staff. There are various ways of studying human problems: psychoanalysis, cognitive therapy, behavioural therapy. It is also possible to focus interest on the communication between individuals. The systemic therapies are interested in the interactions more than with any other aspect of reality, and this always from a pragmatic point of view. This concept is based on a series of designs. First of all, an intervention by problem solving aims at a change: the question is to know how a problem is maintained, hic et nunc. Secondly, humans are a sum of training by tests and errors. Finally, what we call reality is only our perception of reality: the human conflicts emerge when two persons assign a different direction to a reality which is perceived jointly. The human relationship can be defined as interaction circles, which we propose to use in our practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry. The question is no longer to know why the subject has a problem but to know how to resolve it. The call for a consultation of psychiatry is often the result of an interaction between patient and staff. We propose an assessment of the consultation-liaison-psychiatry's demand so as to offer a concrete response to medical teams and patients. 1. First of all, the claimant should be known. This first question is to be asked before even meeting the patient. In the majority of cases, it is the medical staff that suffers from the situation (and wants a change). To work only on the patient, discredits the psychiatric intervention. 2. The definition of the problem is a concrete question, which we want based on the facts and not on the comments. That which requires the consultation (the patient, his/her family or the medical team) awaits concrete answers from the psychiatrist. It is important that the objectives of the intervention are defined before meeting the patient. These preliminary exchanges facilitate the consultation-liaison intervention. 3. By knowing the solutions tried before the request for psychiatric help, the psychiatrist will be able to know the measures already tried (whether they were effective or not). 4. By proposing minimal changes, it defines small but obtainable objectives, which will be as much as to increase therapeutic alliance and the tolerance of patients sometimes difficult to understand. 5. Finally, the consultation-liaison psychiatrist must know the language of his/her interlocutors. Interdisciplinary alliance is a fundamental condition for the success of the intervention: like the patients, the medical staff must feel understood to be able to cooperate. To develop this alliance and to inhibit resistance, it is important to speak the language of the claimant. The demand will progressively become interventions, more adapted, especially when the psychiatrist is recognized and appreciated by the team, like a good consultant, credible and concrete. Thus, mentally distressed patients can benefit from psychiatric care (although they do not request it). However, two phases appear essential. First, we have to define the demand and the claimant (environment, medical staff and patient) and second, we have to support the integration of the psychiatrist in the functioning of the medical unit. Our systemic vision of the consultation-liaison psychiatry proposes a pragmatic collaboration, centred on the problem. This approach allows the patient to prepare to meet the psychiatrist, and does not a priori discredit the intervention. Presented by the staff, who know the problem in concrete terms and are ready to answer it in a concrete way, this mode of intervention is only the first step of subsequent psychiatric care.